모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Subscription Box Curation & Retention Survey

Diagnoses what keeps subscribers renewing a recurring box — unboxing experience, product-value fit, and pricing sensitivity — using a best-worst trade-off to prioritize curation levers and an AI follow-up that surfaces the real reason behind a subscriber's renewal or cancel intent. Built for subscription box brands optimizing retention.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for being a subscriber! We'd love to hear about your experience with your box — from unboxing to whether you'll keep it coming. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 5 minutes and directly shapes future boxes.

Q02
객관식필수

How long have you been subscribed to this box?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 4-6 months
  • 7-12 months
  • More than 1 year
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied were you with your most recent box?

척도: 15
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
매트릭스필수

Rate your most recent box on each of the following:

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Product quality
  • Value for the price
  • Unboxing/packaging experience
  • Personalization to your tastes
  • Delivery reliability (on-time, undamaged)
: Very poor · Poor · Fair · Good · Excellent
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Across pairs of box qualities, which matters most and least to whether you keep subscribing?

  • Product quality
  • Price/value
  • Variety of items each box
  • Personalization to my preferences
  • Surprise/discovery factor
  • Sustainable/eco-friendly packaging
  • Ability to customize or swap items
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to me최악:Matters least to me
Q06
점수 배분필수

If you were designing your ideal future box, how would you split 100 points across these to reflect what you'd want more of?

  • Full-size products
  • Trial/sample sizes
  • Exclusive or limited-edition items
  • Lifestyle extras (stickers, cards, etc.)
  • Higher-value/premium items
100점 배분
Q07
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)필수

Thinking about a monthly subscription box like this one, please answer the following about price:

  • At what monthly price would this subscription box be so inexpensive that you'd question its quality?
  • At what monthly price would this subscription box be a bargain — a great buy for the money?
  • At what monthly price would this subscription box start to seem expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what monthly price would this subscription box be so expensive that you would not consider buying it?
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to continue this subscription for the next 3 months?

척도: 010
최소:Definitely will cancel최대:Definitely will continue
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Anchor on the respondent's stated likelihood to continue and their ratings of quality, value, and personalization. If they lean toward canceling, probe the specific trigger (a bad box, price hike, lack of relevance, competitor offer) and whether anything could win them back. If they lean toward continuing, probe what specifically earns their loyalty and whether any single aspect of the last box still disappointed them despite the overall positive intent.

Q10
객관식

What was the main reason you originally signed up for this box?

  • Discover new products
  • Convenience/save time shopping
  • Cost savings vs. buying items individually
  • Fun/surprise factor
  • Gift for myself or someone else
Q11
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your annual household income?

  • Under $25,000
  • $25,000-$49,999
  • $50,000-$74,999
  • $75,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into how we plan and price upcoming boxes.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off exercise that forces subscribers to prioritize which curation levers (unboxing, product-value fit, pricing) actually drive retention, rather than rating everything highly
  • Pairs a Van Westendorp price sensitivity block with a constant-sum 'ideal box' allocation, giving pricing and curation-mix data in the same flow
  • Features an adaptive AI follow-up interview that anchors on each respondent's own stated renewal likelihood and satisfaction ratings to surface the real reason behind their renew/cancel intent, something static form builders cannot do
  • Closes with an automated per-response quality score and auto-generated report, so subscription brands get a synthesized retention diagnosis rather than a raw response export

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Employee Company Feedback & Culture Pulse Survey

Gauges how employees feel about leadership, growth, workload, and culture, and prioritizes which issues matter most through a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind the recommendation score, surfacing specifics HR and leadership can act on instead of vague satisfaction numbers.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Workplace Disability Accommodation Needs Assessment

Assesses how a disability or health condition affects someone's ability to perform daily work tasks and which accommodations are working or missing. Built for HR, disability management, and occupational health teams, with an AI follow-up that turns the single biggest functional barrier into a concrete, real-world example instead of a checkbox.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Employee Probationary Period Performance Evaluation

A structured manager assessment of how a new hire is performing during their probationary period, covering core competencies, training support, and readiness for confirmed employment. An AI follow-up interview probes the concrete incidents and evidence behind the manager's recommendation rather than just the rating, producing feedback the employee can actually act on.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Election Preference & Issue Priorities Poll

Tracks voter intent, approval of current leadership, and which issues actually drive the decision — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the real reasoning behind a candidate choice instead of the socially acceptable version. Built for campaigns, pollsters, and newsrooms running pre-election tracking surveys.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Hair Salon New Client Intake & Hair History Survey

Captures a new or returning client's hair type, chemical history, sensitivities, and styling goals before their appointment, so stylists arrive prepared instead of guessing. An AI follow-up interview digs into the client's hair story and what 'success' looks like to them, surfacing details a checkbox form would miss.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Pre-Visit Psychiatric Evaluation Intake Questionnaire

A pre-appointment intake for mental health clinics that captures a patient's presenting concern, symptom frequency across common domains, functional impact, safety status, and treatment history before a first psychiatric visit. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs concrete recent examples behind the ratings and checks in sensitively on any safety responses. Not a substitute for crisis assessment.

템플릿 보기