Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Market Research
Win-Loss Interview (AI Voice Debrief)
A voice AI debrief for closed deals — won or lost. Buyers tell an AI interviewer things they'd never tell the salesperson: the real decision criteria, who else was in the running, where the pitch missed, and what nearly changed the outcome. Structured questions make results comparable across deals.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 6개 · 약 10분
Q02
음성 AI 인터뷰
Win-loss debrief interview
Conduct a buyer win-loss debrief. Learn: (1) the trigger that started the evaluation and what would have happened if they'd done nothing; (2) the shortlist — which vendors, how each was found, and first impressions; (3)…
Q03
객관식필수
What was the outcome of your evaluation?
- We chose this product
- We chose a competitor
- We built something in-house
- We decided to do nothing for now
Q04
순위 매기기필수
Rank what mattered most in the final decision.
- Product capabilities and fit
- Price and total cost
- Ease of implementation
- Sales experience and trust
- Security and compliance
- References and reputation
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
의견 척도필수
How confident are you that the decision was the right one?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not confident — could easily have gone the other way최대:Completely confident
Q06
메시지
Thank you! Your debrief joins an anonymized pattern analysis across deals — the fastest way for us to fix what actually loses evaluations.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- An independent AI interviewer hears what buyers won't tell the salesperson — including where the pitch missed and what nearly flipped the outcome
- Covers the full debrief: trigger, shortlist, real versus official criteria, buying committee, sales experience, and pricing honesty
- A structured criteria ranking makes results comparable across every closed deal, win or loss
- Voice interviews take buyers 10 minutes — far cheaper than third-party win-loss consultants per deal
Klue
The 31 Best Win-Loss Questions You Should Be AskingA comprehensive question bank organized across 10 buyer-journey stages (role, awareness, evaluation bias, requirements, consideration, buying committee, demo, product, price, sales process) with strong program-design guidance. Very thorough as a question source, but it is a human-interviewer script; the depth depends on the interviewer probing well.
잘하는 점
- Questions mapped to 10 distinct buyer-journey stages for full-funnel coverage
- Includes buying-committee and evaluation-bias questions that surface hidden decision dynamics
- Program guidance: align internally first, keep evergreen core questions while evolving others quarterly
- Frames questions around what each internal team will actually use, tying research to decisions
아쉬운 점
- It is a question list for a human interviewer, not an AI that conducts the buyer interview and adapts probes live
- No voice-AI interviewer to run debrief calls at scale without a skilled analyst on every call
- No auto-generated win-loss report; theming and synthesis remain manual
- Relies on the interviewer to 'probe for deeper insights' rather than the tool enforcing depth
HubSpot
15 Questions to Ask in a Win-Loss Analysis to Help You Sell BetterA tight, practical set of 15 buyer questions covering decision factors, evaluation criteria, sales-team experience, product likes/dislikes, competitive differentiation, and open feedback, with guidance to keep interviews to 15-20 minutes and distribute findings cross-functionally. Strong starter script but static and human-run.
잘하는 점
- Focused 15-question set that is easy for a non-specialist to run
- Covers biggest decision factor, evaluation criteria, references, sales-team experience, roadmap concerns, and competitive comparison
- Includes a high-signal 'one thing you'd advise us to change' improvement question
- Practical guidance on interview length and sharing insights across departments
아쉬운 점
- Static question list with no adaptive follow-up when a buyer names a competitor or objection
- No voice-AI interviewer; assumes a rep or analyst manually runs each call
- No automated synthesis into win/loss themes or an executive-ready report
- Objectivity guidance (use a neutral interviewer) is advice, not something the tool enforces
Satrix Solutions
The Ideal Sales Win-Loss Analysis TemplateA methodology guide for structuring win-loss interviews: use an impartial third party, define deal-selection criteria, schedule 20-30 minute calls, record with permission, and work from a live topics document rather than a rigid questionnaire. Strong on process discipline but light on the actual question list and reads as a consulting-led, manual program.
잘하는 점
- Emphasizes interviewer objectivity via an impartial third party to reduce bias
- Concrete deal-selection criteria for which deals to interview (revenue threshold, competitive deals, expected losses)
- Practical logistics: email to schedule 20-30 minute calls, record with permission
- Advocates a fluid 'live document' of topics over a rigid questionnaire to keep conversations natural
아쉬운 점
- Positions win-loss as a human-consultant service; no AI interviewer to deliver that neutrality at scale or lower cost
- No voice-AI capability to conduct the recorded debrief calls automatically
- The 'strong listener who probes deeper' requirement is a person, not an automated adaptive-follow-up engine
- Analysis/interpretation is deferred to later manual steps rather than an auto-generated report
SurveyMonkey
Win Loss Survey TemplateA fielding-ready win-loss survey aimed at evaluating sales strategies and improving win rates. Solid for scaled, structured deal feedback, but it is a static form — buyers type what they're willing to volunteer, with nothing probing the story behind a lost deal.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-send template purpose-built for win-loss feedback
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's benchmarks and analysis tooling
- Quick to deploy across many closed deals at once
아쉬운 점
- Static question set — no adaptive follow-ups on why the decision really went the way it did
- No voice-interview option for the richer debrief buyers give in conversation
- No independent-interviewer framing; it reads as the vendor asking directly
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Market Research
Customer Discovery Interview (Mom Test Style)
A voice AI discovery interview that follows Mom Test rules automatically: past behavior, not hypotheticals; specifics, not compliments. It asks about the last time the problem happened, what it cost, and what they've already tried — the questions founders forget to ask when a polite prospect starts flattering their idea.
템플릿 보기Market Research
Conjoint Analysis: Package & Price Trade-Off Study
A choice-based conjoint that shows respondents realistic product profiles built from attributes and levels — plan tier, price, support, contract terms — and measures which combinations win. AI follow-ups capture the reasoning behind choices that a choice matrix alone can't explain.
템플릿 보기Market Research
MaxDiff Feature Prioritization Survey
Force real trade-offs with best-worst scaling: respondents pick the most and least valuable feature in rotating sets, then an AI interviewer probes the reasoning behind their top pick. Produces a true preference ranking instead of everything-is-important rating inflation.
템플릿 보기Market Research
Value Proposition Clarity & Appeal Assessment
Measures how clearly, credibly, and compellingly a value proposition communicates to target audiences, identifying perceived benefits, barriers to action, and messaging improvements to optimize conversion.
템플릿 보기Market Research
중소기업 핀테크 애로사항 및 우선순위 평가
소상공인 및 프리랜서를 대상으로 현금 흐름, 마케팅, 채용, 소프트웨어 도구 전반의 운영상 어려움을 파악하여 핀테크 제품 전략과 기능 우선순위 설정에 반영합니다.
템플릿 보기Market Research
스타트업 페인 포인트 우선순위 분석: 빈도, 심각도 및 지불 의향
스타트업 창업자와 운영자가 직면하는 가장 시급한 운영상의 과제를 파악하고 순위를 매기며, 빈도와 심각도, 지불 의향을 측정하여 제품 로드맵 및 가격 책정 결정에 정보를 제공합니다.
템플릿 보기