Patient Experience & Satisfaction Survey (NPS + CSAT)
Measures patient satisfaction across appointment scheduling, provider interaction quality, and health technology reliability using NPS and CSAT frameworks. Designed for clinics and health systems seeking actionable improvement data.
Perguntas de exemplo
Uma prévia do que há no modelo. Todas as perguntas podem ser editadas antes de publicar.
When was your most recent visit with this clinic or provider?
- Within the last 7 days
- 1–4 weeks ago
- 1–3 months ago
- More than 3 months ago
- Not sure
How did you schedule or request this visit? Select all that apply.
- Phone call
- Online patient portal
- Clinic website
- Walk-in
- Referral from another provider
- Mobile app
- Other
The following questions ask about the clinician you saw during this visit. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement.
Which of the following technologies, if any, were part of this visit? Select all that apply.
- None
- Telehealth video
- Patient portal/app (forms, messages)
- Remote monitoring device
- Kiosk or check-in tablet
- Automated phone/SMS reminders
- Other
How likely are you to recommend this clinic or provider to a friend or family member?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve the quality of care and access at this clinic. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact [clinic contact information].
What type of visit was it?
- In-person visit
- Video/telehealth
- Phone consult
- Messaging/portal only
How easy was it to schedule your appointment?
My clinician listened carefully to my concerns.
Overall, how reliable was the technology you used during this visit?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with access, provider interaction, or technology during this visit?
Which gender do you identify with?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes the service you received?
- Primary care
- Specialist
- Urgent care
- Diagnostic/imaging
- Therapy/behavioral health
- Other
Approximately how long did you wait past your scheduled appointment time?
- No wait or not applicable
- 1–10 minutes
- 11–20 minutes
- 21–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- More than 60 minutes
My clinician explained my condition and treatment options clearly.
If you experienced any technical issues during this visit, please briefly describe what happened.
We'd like to learn a bit more about your visit experience. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your responses.
Approximately how many healthcare visits have you had in the past 12 months?
- 0 (this was my first)
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
- Prefer not to say
If scheduling was difficult, what specifically made it hard?
My clinician treated me with courtesy and respect.
My clinician spent enough time with me during the visit.
Overall, how would you rate the quality of care you received during this visit?
O que está incluído
Acompanhamento com IA
Sondagens adaptativas nas respostas abertas que revelam detalhes que um formulário estático deixaria passar.
Verificações de atenção
Proteções integradas contra respostas apressadas e participantes de baixa qualidade.
Textos escritos por IA
Redação, ordem e ramificações escritas pela IA, ajustadas ao seu objetivo de pesquisa.
Relatório automático
Temas, citações e um resumo em linguagem simples se escrevem sozinhos assim que as respostas chegam.
Como se compara
Analisamos os modelos mais parecidos de outras ferramentas de pesquisa. Veja o que elas fazem bem e onde este modelo vai além.
Por que este modelo
- Combines quantitative NPS/CSAT scoring with an AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper on scheduling difficulties, clinician interaction quality, or technology issues in the respondent's own words.
- Covers the full patient journey in one instrument — scheduling ease and wait time, clinician listening/clarity/courtesy/time spent, technology reliability, and overall NPS — rather than a single satisfaction snapshot.
- Open-text questions on scheduling friction and technical issues let patients explain root causes, which the adaptive AI interview can then follow up on for specifics.
- Transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring mean clinics get clean, analyzable data plus an auto-generated report without manual coding of open-ended responses.
QuestionPro
Health Insurance Satisfaction Survey TemplateA fielding-ready static template focused on health insurance/patient satisfaction rather than the full clinic visit journey. Good for quick deployment with standard question logic, but narrower in scope than a combined NPS+CSAT clinic experience survey. No mention of adaptive interviewing or voice-based data collection.
O que faz bem
- Ready-to-use template within an established survey platform
- Focused specifically on insurance/patient satisfaction context
- Likely supports standard skip logic and reporting dashboards
Onde deixa a desejar
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Free Patient Satisfaction Survey Template | For Healthcare IndustryA free, fielding-ready patient satisfaction template built on SurveySparrow's conversational survey format, which gives it a friendlier feel than a plain form. It still relies on fixed question flows rather than true AI-driven adaptive questioning, and covers general healthcare satisfaction rather than a structured NPS+CSAT breakdown across scheduling, provider, and technology.
O que faz bem
- Conversational, chat-style survey UI that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
- Free to use, lowering the barrier for smaller clinics
- Purpose-built for the healthcare industry
Onde deixa a desejar
- No adaptive AI interview capability — question flow is fixed/branching, not dynamically generated per response
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure
SurveyMonkey
Patient Satisfaction Survey TemplateA well-established, fielding-ready post-visit patient satisfaction template from a major survey platform, likely offering solid analytics and benchmarking. It is a static questionnaire format, and there's no indication it includes adaptive follow-up questioning, voice-based interviews, or automated qualitative analysis of open-ended responses.
O que faz bem
- Backed by a widely used, mature survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking tools
- Specifically designed for post-visit patient feedback
- Likely offers customizable branding and distribution options
Onde deixa a desejar
- Static form structure with no adaptive AI probing on individual answers
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology for follow-up questions
Perguntas frequentes
Quais perguntas estão no modelo “Patient Experience & Satisfaction Survey (NPS + CSAT)”?
O modelo inclui 24 perguntas prontas para usar, começando por: “Welcome, and thank you for considering this survey. This brief questionnaire takes approximately 11 minutes and asks abo…” · “When was your most recent visit with this clinic or provider?” · “How did you schedule or request this visit? Select all that apply.”. O conjunto completo aparece acima e todas as perguntas podem ser editadas.
Quanto tempo leva para responder a esta pesquisa?
Os participantes normalmente terminam as 24 perguntas em cerca de 11 minutos.
Posso personalizar este modelo?
Sim: cada pergunta, cada opção de resposta e a ordem podem ser editadas antes de publicar. Você pode adicionar ou remover perguntas, ou pedir ao editor com IA para refazer a pesquisa em torno do seu objetivo.
Este modelo é gratuito?
Sim. Abra no editor e comece a personalizar agora: não é preciso criar conta para testar, e o plano gratuito cobre a publicação da sua pesquisa.
Pronto para publicar?
Abra este modelo no editor. Tudo é seu para mudar antes de o primeiro participante ver.
Modelos relacionados
Mais estudos sobre temas semelhantes.
Pesquisa de Experiência do Paciente Pós-Consulta e NPS
Mede a satisfação do paciente em agendamento, tempos de espera, interação com o profissional e qualidade da telessaúde usando NPS e escalas de experiência multidimensionais para organizações de saúde que buscam insights acionáveis de melhoria.
Ver modeloPesquisa de Experiência do Paciente: Acesso, Comunicação e Qualidade do Atendimento
Mede a satisfação do paciente em relação ao acesso a consultas, à comunicação com o profissional de saúde, à agilidade no acompanhamento e aos pontos de contato digitais, voltada a organizações de saúde que buscam insights acionáveis de melhoria e benchmarking de NPS.
Ver modeloPesquisa de Satisfação e Comunicação da Consulta do Paciente
Avalia a experiência do paciente em relação ao acesso ao agendamento, comunicação com o profissional de saúde, acompanhamento após a consulta e satisfação geral para identificar melhorias práticas na qualidade do atendimento.
Ver modeloPesquisa de Experiência do Cliente com Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Uma pesquisa de NPS metodologicamente sólida para medir a lealdade do cliente juntamente com a satisfação geral. Projetada para aplicação após a interação ou de forma periódica, para identificar promotores, neutros e detratores, e revelar fatores acionáveis da experiência do cliente.
Ver modeloPesquisa de CSAT, CES e NPS Após Interação com o Suporte
Mede o esforço, a satisfação e a lealdade do cliente imediatamente após uma interação com o suporte. Desenvolvida para equipes de CX que buscam benchmarks acionáveis de CSAT, CES e NPS em menos de 3 minutos.
Ver modeloPesquisa de Satisfação Pós-Evento e Feedback NPS
Mede a satisfação dos participantes, a qualidade das sessões, a logística e os resultados de networking com benchmarking de NPS. Desenvolvida para organizadores de eventos que buscam dados acionáveis para aprimorar eventos futuros.
Ver modelo