すべてのテンプレート
Strategy & Transformation

AI Agent & Human Workflow Redesign Readiness Assessment

Diagnoses whether a specific team or process is actually ready to redesign work around AI agents — covering current usage, data and skills readiness, redesign priorities, and change barriers. Built for operations, transformation, and IT leaders scoping where to pilot next; the AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest blocker instead of accepting a generic 'change management' answer.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We're assessing how ready this workflow and team are for AI agents to take on more of the work — your honest read matters more than an optimistic one. About 6-7 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which part of the organization does the workflow you're evaluating primarily sit in?

  • Customer Support
  • Sales & CRM
  • Finance & Accounting
  • HR & People Ops
  • IT & Engineering
  • Operations & Supply Chain
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How would you rate the current level of AI agent use in this workflow today — meaning autonomous or semi-autonomous AI systems that complete tasks with limited human input?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not used at all最大:Fully integrated into daily work
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this workflow's readiness for redesign?

6行 × 5列
  • Leadership has committed real budget and time to this
  • The process steps are clearly documented today
  • The data feeding this workflow is clean and accessible
  • Employees trust AI-generated outputs enough to act on them
  • There's a clear process for handling errors or exceptions
  • ほか1件
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, which tasks in this workflow have been most repetitive or rules-based?

  • Data entry or reconciliation
  • Scheduling or routing decisions
  • Drafting responses or content
  • Answering routine questions
  • Compiling reports
  • Approvals and sign-offs
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Looking at these potential redesign moves, which would you tackle first and which would you leave for last?

  • Automating data entry and reconciliation
  • Routing or triage decisions
  • Drafting first-pass responses or content
  • Handling exceptions and escalations
  • Managing approval workflows
  • Answering routine customer or employee questions
  • Compiling reports and analytics
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Redesign first最も悪い:Redesign last
Q07
ポイント配分必須

If you had 100 points of investment to make this redesign succeed, how would you split them across these areas?

  • Employee training and upskilling
  • Redocumenting or redesigning the process itself
  • AI agent tooling and system integration
  • Governance, risk and compliance controls
  • Change management and communication
100ポイントを配分
Q08
ランク付け必須

Rank these from biggest to smallest barrier to redesigning this workflow with AI agents.

  1. Unclear ownership of the change
  2. Data quality or access issues
  3. Employee resistance or lack of trust
  4. Lack of technical integration
  5. Unclear return on investment
  6. Compliance or risk concerns
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that your team could adapt to a redesigned version of this workflow within the next 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q10
AIインタビュー

Anchor on the readiness statement this respondent rated lowest and the barrier they ranked as biggest. Probe concretely: what specifically would have to change for that barrier to no longer be a blocker, and what's one recent moment where this barrier actually got in the way? If they rated the team as fully ready with no real barriers, stress-test that by asking what would happen if the AI agent made a visible mistake tomorrow. If confidence in adapting was low, ask what timeline they'd consider realistic instead and why.

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role relative to this workflow?

  • Individual contributor doing the work
  • People manager overseeing the team
  • Senior leader or executive sponsor
  • External advisor or consultant
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What's the approximate size of your organization?

  • Fewer than 100 employees
  • 100-999 employees
  • 1,000-9,999 employees
  • 10,000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the candid input. Your answers feed a readiness scorecard that helps prioritize which workflows get an AI agent pilot next and what needs to be fixed first.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Anchors on one specific team or workflow (not the whole org), starting with where it sits, current AI agent usage level, and a matrix of readiness statements it can be scored against.
  • Uses a max diff exercise and a constant-sum budget allocation to force tradeoffs on which redesign moves matter most, rather than accepting flat agree/disagree answers.
  • Includes a ranking exercise on change barriers plus an AI follow-up interview that anchors on the specific lowest-rated readiness statement and the top-ranked barrier, pushing past a generic 'change management' answer to the actual blocker.
  • Closes with role and org-size context and feeds directly into an auto-generated report, so operations/IT leaders get a diagnosis of pilot readiness for that specific workflow, not just a topline score.

SurveyMonkey

AI Readiness Assessment Template

A fielding-ready template for gauging general AI readiness, built on SurveyMonkey's standard survey infrastructure. It appears aimed at organization-wide sentiment rather than diagnosing whether one specific team or workflow is ready to redesign around AI agents. Useful as a broad pulse-check, but not built to isolate a single blocker for a targeted pilot decision.

優れている点

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution, analytics, and reporting infrastructure
  • Quick to deploy and customize for a general AI-readiness pulse check
  • Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's benchmarking and dashboard tooling

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into the specific reason readiness is low
  • Appears scoped to organization-level AI sentiment rather than diagnosing a specific workflow's redesign readiness
  • No published methodology or per-response quality scoring visible on the template

よくあるご質問

「AI Agent & Human Workflow Redesign Readiness Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We're assessing how…」・「Which part of the organization does the workflow you're evaluating primarily sit in?」・「How would you rate the current level of AI agent use in this workflow today — meaning autonomous or semi-autonomous AI s…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る