Frontier AI Skills Gap Self-Assessment for Teams
Measures how confident employees feel using frontier AI tools like ChatGPT and Copilot across core workplace skills, where the biggest gaps sit, and what's blocking adoption. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's lowest-confidence skill area, not just the number they picked. Built for HR and L&D teams planning AI training.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the last 30 days, how often have you used generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini) in your day-to-day work?
- Not at all
- A few times
- Weekly
- Daily
- Multiple times a day
How confident do you feel doing each of the following right now?
- Writing prompts that get useful results on the first or second try
- Judging whether an AI output is accurate before using it
- Fitting AI tools into your existing workflow without extra hassle
- Understanding where AI tools are likely to get things wrong
- Using AI to analyze or summarize data
- ほか1件
Which of the following AI-related training have you received in the past 12 months?
- Formal company-provided training or workshop
- Self-directed learning (courses, videos, articles)
- Peer or manager mentoring
- Vendor or tool-specific onboarding
Which of these skill areas most needs development on your team, and which needs it least?
- Writing effective prompts
- Spotting inaccurate or fabricated AI output
- Data privacy and security practices with AI tools
- Automating repetitive tasks with AI
- Using AI for coding or technical work
- Using AI for writing and communication
- Judging when NOT to use AI
- Collaborating across teams on AI-assisted work
How confident are you that your team's overall AI skills will keep pace with how fast the technology is changing?
What is the single biggest thing stopping you from using AI more effectively in your role?
- Lack of training or guidance
- Unclear when AI is appropriate to use
- Not enough time to experiment
- Concerns about data, security, or accuracy
- Limited access to tools or licenses
- Little encouragement from leadership or managers
Anchor on the skill area where this respondent rated their confidence lowest and the barrier they picked as biggest. Get a concrete, recent example of a moment that gap actually slowed them down or produced a bad outcome, and ask what specific support (training, tool, time, permission) would have closed the gap in that moment. If they say they have no confidence gaps at all, probe whether that's because they genuinely feel prepared or because they simply avoid using AI for anything ambiguous.
Almost done — just a couple of quick background questions to help us understand patterns across teams.
Which department are you part of?
- Engineering / Product
- Sales / Business Development
- Marketing
- Operations
- Finance
- Human Resources
- Customer Support
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been with the company?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-7 years
- More than 7 years
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your role level?
- Individual contributor
- Team lead / Manager
- Director / Senior leadership
- Executive
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for being candid! Your responses, combined with everyone else's, will shape what AI training and support we roll out next, no individual answers will be singled out.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Digs into the story behind each person's lowest-confidence skill area with an AI follow-up interview, not just a static rating
- Uses a slider matrix plus a max-diff exercise to pinpoint which skill gaps matter most on a team, not just a single self-rating scale
- Separates recent AI usage frequency, training received, and adoption blockers so L&D teams can see where confidence, access, and training diverge
- Collects role level, tenure, and department as context so results can be segmented when planning targeted AI training
Jotform
Digital Skills Self-Assessment Form TemplateA static form template for self-rating general digital skills, easy to customize and embed via Jotform's form builder. It covers digital skills broadly rather than frontier AI tools specifically, and it's a fielding-ready form rather than a research instrument with built-in analysis. No mechanism to explore why a respondent rated a skill low.
優れている点
- Simple, quick-to-deploy form builder with drag-and-drop customization
- Broad digital skills framing that's easy to adapt to different audiences
- Established, widely used form platform with integrations
物足りない点
- Static self-rating only — no adaptive follow-up to understand the reasoning behind low-confidence answers
- Not focused on frontier AI tools (ChatGPT, Copilot) or team-level training planning
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesizing themes
QuestionPro
Self evaluation of productivity and quality survey questions + sample questionnaire templateA general employee self-assessment questionnaire centered on productivity and quality rather than AI skills or adoption specifically. It's a broad, adaptable sample question set on an established survey platform, useful as a generic starting point but not tailored to AI skills gaps. Analysis appears to rely on standard survey reporting rather than qualitative follow-up.
優れている点
- Flexible sample question bank covering general performance self-evaluation
- Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with reporting dashboards
- Easy to adapt wording for different self-assessment use cases
物足りない点
- Not built around frontier AI tool confidence or adoption blockers — requires heavy customization to fit this use case
- No adaptive AI interview to probe the story behind a low self-rating
- No transparent, published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized
SurveySparrow
Free Soft Skills Assessment QuestionnaireA conversational-style questionnaire focused on soft skills (communication, teamwork, etc.), not AI tool confidence or adoption. It's fielding-ready and benefits from SurveySparrow's chat-like UI, but it doesn't address frontier AI skills gaps or training blockers at all. Useful only as a loosely related template for general skills self-assessment.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style question flow that can feel more engaging than a static form
- Exportable to PDF and easy to launch quickly
- Focused specifically on soft-skills competencies with pre-built question sets
物足りない点
- Entirely soft-skills focused — no coverage of AI tool usage, confidence, or adoption blockers
- No adaptive follow-up interview to explore the reasoning behind a low skill rating
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated report tailored to AI training planning
よくあるご質問
「Frontier AI Skills Gap Self-Assessment for Teams」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes for this one! We're trying to understand how comfortable people feel using AI tools at w…」・「In the last 30 days, how often have you used generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini) in your day-to…」・「How confident do you feel doing each of the following right now?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。