Leadership Alignment on AI Strategy Pulse Check
A short pulse check for executive and senior leadership teams that surfaces where AI strategy is genuinely shared versus quietly contested — covering clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or disagreement behind the lowest-rated alignment statement instead of settling for a vague 'somewhat aligned' score.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
How clear is our organization's AI strategy to you personally?
How much do you agree with each of the following statements about our leadership team's alignment on AI?
- Leadership agrees on the top 2-3 AI use cases to prioritize
- We've allocated sufficient budget to execute our AI plans
- Roles and decision rights for AI initiatives are clear
- We have a shared view of acceptable AI risk and governance
- Leadership communicates a consistent AI narrative to the rest of the organization
Which of these AI investment areas matter most for our strategy right now?
- Customer experience & engagement
- Internal productivity & automation
- New product or revenue innovation
- Risk, compliance & governance
- Talent capability & AI literacy
- Data & infrastructure readiness
- Competitive differentiation
If you had 100 points of budget to allocate across these AI-related priorities for the next 12 months, how would you split them?
- Customer-facing AI products/features
- Internal productivity & automation tools
- Data & infrastructure investment
- Risk, compliance & governance
- Talent, training & change management
Which best describes our organization's current stage of AI adoption?
- Exploring / early pilots only
- Scaling a few proven use cases
- AI embedded in core workflows
- Still mostly conceptual / no active projects
- Not sure
How confident are you that we'll achieve our stated AI strategy goals in the next 12 months?
What's the biggest barrier to better leadership alignment on AI right now? (Select up to two)
- Unclear or competing business priorities
- Insufficient budget or resources
- Unclear ownership / decision rights
- Gaps in AI skills or literacy on the leadership team
- Data or technical readiness
- Differing risk tolerance across leaders
- Lack of a shared success metric
Identify which alignment statement the respondent rated lowest and probe concretely: what specific decision, budget line, or use case is leadership actually disagreeing about, who holds the opposing view, and how it connects to the barrier they selected. If they rated everything highly, stress-test that by asking for a recent example where leadership's AI priorities visibly conflicted. Close by asking what decision needs to get made in the next 30 days to move alignment forward.
What is the one decision our leadership team needs to make about AI in the next quarter that we keep avoiding or delaying?
Which best describes your role level?
- C-suite / executive leadership
- Senior VP / VP
- Director
- Senior manager
- Other leadership role
- Prefer not to say
Which function do you primarily represent?
- Technology / Engineering
- Product
- Operations
- Finance
- Marketing / Sales
- HR / People
- Legal / Risk / Compliance
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thanks for your candid input. Responses are aggregated into a leadership alignment report — no individual answers are attributed by name — to help focus our next AI strategy conversation.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。
ここが違う
- Goes beyond generic leadership check-ins by focusing specifically on AI strategy: clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage, using a matrix, max-diff, and constant-sum allocation to surface real trade-off thinking, not just satisfaction scores
- Pinpoints the exact alignment statement each respondent rated lowest and runs an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific decision or disagreement behind it, instead of stopping at a vague 'somewhat aligned' number
- Segments results by role level and function so leadership can see whether misalignment is company-wide or concentrated in specific groups, alongside an open question forcing respondents to name the one AI decision leadership must make next
- Automatically aggregates responses into a leadership alignment report, saving the manual synthesis work that static survey exports require
よくあるご質問
「Leadership Alignment on AI Strategy Pulse Check」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to weigh in on where our leadership team stands on AI strategy. This pulse check covers…」・「How clear is our organization's AI strategy to you personally?」・「How much do you agree with each of the following statements about our leadership team's alignment on AI?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。