AI Content Watermark Perception & Trust Survey
Measures consumer awareness, trust, acceptability, and behavioral intentions regarding AI content provenance watermarks, designed for technology policy researchers and platform designers evaluating labeling strategies.
登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限
Welcome! Thank you for taking part in this short, anonymous survey (approximately 10 minutes). We are studying how people perceive content labeling signals online. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are confidential, will be reported only in aggregate, and used for research purposes. Participation is voluntary, and you may skip any question or stop at any time.
Powered by QuestionPunk
デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the past 30 days, where have you encountered AI-generated content (text, images, or video)? Select all that apply.
- Social media feeds
- News websites or apps
- Short-video platforms (e.g., TikTok, Reels)
- Image galleries or generators
- Messaging apps
- Search results
- Online ads
- Streaming platforms
- None of the above
Before today, how familiar were you with labels or watermarks that indicate how online content was created or edited?
- Very familiar
- Somewhat familiar
- Heard of the idea but not the term
- Not at all familiar
For this survey, an AI content watermark is an embedded signal or visible label that indicates how content was created or edited (for example, with an AI tool). It can help people and platforms verify the origin of content and detect manipulations.
Overall, how useful do you think AI content watermarks would be for everyday internet users?
How acceptable is it for platforms (e.g., social media, news sites) to display a label when a watermark indicating AI involvement is detected?
If a news article included a clear watermark showing it was written by a human journalist, how much would your trust in that article change?
If a social media post included a clear watermark showing it was AI-generated, how much would your trust in that post change?
If a product image on an online store included a clear watermark showing it was AI-generated, how much would your trust in that image change?
Imagine you are shopping online and a product image displays an AI watermark. How likely would you be to purchase that product?
If you saw a watermark indicating AI involvement on a piece of content, how might your behavior change? Select all that apply.
- Pay closer attention to details
- Be more skeptical of claims
- Ignore the watermark
- Avoid sharing the content
- Report suspicious posts
- No change
Which of the following watermark-related features would you support on major platforms? Select all that apply.
- Always-visible badge on content
- Click to view detailed provenance information
- Hidden but verifiable watermark
- Automatic platform labeling when AI is detected
- No labeling of AI content
- Unsure
Please rank the following concerns about AI-generated content from most concerning (1) to least concerning (6).
- Misinformation and false claims
- Deepfakes and impersonation
- Copyright and ownership issues
- Privacy risks
- Spam and flooding of low-quality content
- Bias or discrimination
Please rank the following outcomes you most want AI watermarks to support, from highest priority (1) to lowest priority (6).
- Easier source verification
- Detecting edits or manipulation
- Clear labeling for users
- Platform accountability
- Creator attribution
- Age-appropriate or sensitive-content flags
Based on your responses in this survey, what would make AI content watermarks more useful or trustworthy to you? Please share any additional thoughts in 1–2 sentences.
We'd like to explore your thoughts on AI content watermarks in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
How do you describe your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
In which region do you currently live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Middle East
- Prefer not to say
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college / Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate / Professional degree
- Prefer not to say
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Homemaker
- Retired
- Unemployed
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses have been recorded and will be used for research purposes only. We appreciate your time and insights.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
よくあるご質問
「AI Content Watermark Perception & Trust Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が19問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「In the past 30 days, where have you encountered AI-generated content (text, images, or video)? Select all that apply.」・「Before today, how familiar were you with labels or watermarks that indicate how online content was created or edited?」・「Overall, how useful do you think AI content watermarks would be for everyday internet users?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、19問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。






