Developer Content Filter False Positive Impact Assessment
Assess how content filter false positives affect developer productivity, workflow disruption, and tool adoption decisions. Designed for developer experience researchers and tooling teams seeking actionable improvement priorities from software practitioners.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the last 30 days, have you used any developer tools that enforce content moderation or safety filters?
- Yes, in the last 30 days
- No, not in the last 30 days
Which types of developer tools with content filters have you used in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
- AI code assistants (e.g., coding copilots)
- Code hosting/PR checks (e.g., repo content policies)
- Package registries with policy checks (e.g., npm, PyPI)
- Documentation portals or knowledge bases
- Q&A forums or developer communities
- CI/CD or security policy gates
- Other (please specify)
Why haven't you used developer tools with content filters in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
- None of my current tools apply content filters
- I avoid tools that include filters
- Company policy restricts such tools
- I'm unsure which tools include filters
- Other (please specify)
When it comes to content filters in developer tools, which trade-off do you prefer?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or experiences about false positives or content filter design in developer tools.
What is your primary role?
- Backend developer
- Frontend developer
- Full-stack developer
- DevOps/SRE
- ML/AI engineer
- Security engineer
- Engineering manager
- QA/Testing
- Other
Thank you for your time. Your feedback will help improve content filter design in developer tools and reduce the impact of false positives on developer workflows.
How often did you encounter false positives from these content filters in the last 30 days?
If developer tools you use introduced content filters, how disruptive do you expect false positives would be to your workflow?
In your view, what most often causes false positives in developer tool content filters? Select all that apply.
- Ambiguous or broad policy definitions
- Overly sensitive detection models
- Missing contextual signals (e.g., file type, repo trust)
- Poor or unrepresentative training examples
- Misclassifying code vs. natural language
- Locale or language issues
- Unclear UI messaging or guidance
- Other (please specify)
How many years of professional software development experience do you have?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–6 years
- 7–10 years
- 11–15 years
- 16–20 years
- More than 20 years
Overall, how disruptive were the false positives you encountered in the last 30 days?
What informs your expectations about content filter false positives? Select all that apply.
- Teammates' experiences
- Industry news or reports
- Past experiences in other tools
- Social media or forums
- Vendor documentation or release notes
- Other (please specify)
Rank the following improvements by how much they would reduce the impact of false positives. Place the most impactful improvement first.
- Clearer policy definitions in tools
- Better detection models (precision/recall tuning)
- Use more context (file type, repo trust, role)
- Faster and more transparent appeal or override process
- Granular admin and user controls
- Improved UI messaging and guidance
What is your organization size?
- 1 (just me)
- 2–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
Briefly describe your most recent false positive from a content filter in the last 30 days. Please omit any sensitive or proprietary data.
Where are you primarily located?
- North America
- Europe
- Latin America
- Asia
- Africa
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how long did it take to resolve your most recent false positive?
- Less than 5 minutes
- 5–15 minutes
- 16–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- 1–2 hours
- More than 2 hours
- It was never resolved
Which programming languages do you use most often? Select all that apply.
- JavaScript/TypeScript
- Python
- Java/Kotlin
- C/C++
- C#/.NET
- Go
- Ruby
- Rust
- Swift/Objective-C
- PHP
- SQL
- Other
After encountering the false positive, what actions did you take? Select all that apply.
- Submitted an appeal or requested a review
- Reworded or reformatted content
- Used a different tool or channel
- Waited and retried later
- Asked a teammate/admin with different access
- Abandoned the task
- Other (please specify)
Rank the top 3 effects you experienced from false positives. Place the highest-impact effect first.
- Lost time
- Context switching
- Blocked release or review
- Lower code quality or shortcuts
- Frustration or stress
- Team coordination overhead
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
よくあるご質問
「Developer Content Filter False Positive Impact Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey explores your recent experiences with content filters and false positives in developer tools. Your…」・「In the last 30 days, have you used any developer tools that enforce content moderation or safety filters?」・「Which types of developer tools with content filters have you used in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。