QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Construction Project Extranet Usability Survey

Measures how project teams actually use their construction project extranet for document control, RFIs, and drawing markup, and where version confusion or slow approvals cost time. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent incident to surface the real workflow friction behind the ratings.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on the project extranet (document/collaboration platform) used on your projects. This helps us improve how drawings, RFIs, and approvals flow between teams. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which project extranet or document management platform do you use most on active projects?

  • (Replace with Platform A, e.g. Asite)
  • (Replace with Platform B, e.g. Procore)
  • (Replace with Platform C, e.g. Autodesk Build)
  • Shared drive / email only
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

In the last 30 days, how often did you log into the project extranet to check drawings, RFIs, or approvals?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Never最大:Multiple times a day
Q04
マトリクス必須

Rate how well the platform supports each of these tasks on your current project.

5行 × 5列
  • Finding the latest drawing revision
  • Tracking RFI status and responses
  • Markup and comment threads on drawings
  • Notifications for changes that affect your work
  • Uploading and sharing site photos or field reports
列: Very poor · Poor · Okay · Good · Very good
Q05
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did you accidentally work from an outdated drawing or document version?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Frequently
Q06
評価スケール必須

How easy is it to find the current approved drawing set when you need it?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q07
ポイント配分

Thinking about a typical week, how do the minutes you spend on the extranet split across these activities? Allocate 100 points total.

  • Searching for documents or drawings
  • Submitting or responding to RFIs
  • Reviewing markups and comments
  • Uploading photos or field reports
  • Chasing approvals or sign-offs
100ポイントを配分
Q08
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these improvements would help your work most, and which would help least?

  • Faster search for the latest drawing
  • Clearer notification of what changed and why
  • Simpler RFI submission process
  • Better mobile / offline access on site
  • Fewer duplicate or conflicting file versions
  • Easier markup and annotation tools
  • Faster page load and upload speed
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most helpful最も悪い:Least helpful
Q09
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to walk through the most recent time the project extranet caused confusion or delay (e.g., wrong drawing revision, missed notification, slow approval) — what happened, how it was caught, and how much time or rework it cost. Anchor on their rating of finding the latest drawing revision; if they rated it poorly, probe exactly where the process breaks down. If they report no issues, probe what specifically about the setup makes it work well for their trade or role.

Q10
選択式

What is your primary role on projects?

  • Project manager
  • Site supervisor / foreman
  • Design / engineering
  • Subcontractor trade
  • Owner's representative
  • Admin / document controller
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How many people work at your company?

  • Fewer than 20
  • 20-99
  • 100-499
  • 500 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That wraps up the survey — thank you! Your answers will be combined with your team's to guide changes to how we manage drawings, RFIs, and approvals on the project extranet.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through the most recent time the extranet caused a specific problem, reconstructing the actual incident rather than relying on generic ratings
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale on login frequency, matrix on task support, rating on finding approved drawings, constant sum on time allocation, max-diff on improvement priorities) with qualitative depth on version confusion and approval delays
  • Captures role and company size context alongside platform usage, so friction points can be segmented by who is experiencing them
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean the incident narratives get structured analysis without manual coding

QuestionPro

Project Extranets in the Construction Industry Survey + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is the most directly comparable template, covering the same core subject: how construction teams use project extranets for documents and drawings. It appears to be a static questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview, focused on structured rating and multiple-choice items. Useful as a benchmark for question coverage but likely doesn't probe into a specific recent incident the way an AI-driven follow-up would.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the construction project extranet use case, so question framing is likely industry-specific
  • Packaged as a ready sample questionnaire, making it easy to adopt or adapt quickly
  • Backed by a long-established survey platform with broad distribution and analysis tooling

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct a specific incident behind a low rating — respondents answer fixed items with no probing for root cause
  • No indication of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for observing actual drawing markup or RFI workflows
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology, so it's unclear how open-ended answers are validated

よくあるご質問

「Construction Project Extranet Usability Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on the project extranet (document/collaboration platform) used on your…」・「Which project extranet or document management platform do you use most on active projects?」・「In the last 30 days, how often did you log into the project extranet to check drawings, RFIs, or approvals?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Retirement Housing Preferences & Trade-Off Priorities Survey

Uncovers which retirement housing features — cost, location, care access, privacy, community life — actually drive decisions, using trade-off exercises and price sensitivity questions instead of simple ratings. Built for senior living operators, developers, and planners, with an AI follow-up that probes what respondents would sacrifice to secure their top priority.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Project Management Software Usage & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how teams actually use their project management tool day to day — adoption, feature-level satisfaction, and the friction points that drive people back to spreadsheets — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific recent workflow moment instead of general sentiment. Built for product, IT, and operations teams evaluating or renewing tools.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Website Building Process & Workflow Survey

Captures how people and teams actually spend their time building or redesigning websites — which tools they rely on, where friction piles up, and how satisfied they are at each stage. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest bottleneck respondents hit, reconstructing what happened and what workaround (if any) they used.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Product Usability & User Experience Feedback Survey

Evaluates how easy, efficient, and satisfying your product or website is to use, combining attribute ratings and a prioritization exercise with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent moment of friction instead of relying on vague complaints. Built for product, design, and research teams running ongoing usability tracking.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Online Purchasing Experience Survey

Explores how employees shop online for work needs — software, supplies, travel, equipment — and how smooth or frustrating the approval and procurement process feels. Includes an AI follow-up that reconstructs a recent purchase attempt step by step, surfacing friction points and workarounds that closed-ended questions miss. Built for HR and procurement teams evaluating purchasing tools and policy.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Online Proposal Experience & Decision Feedback Survey

Captures how recipients experienced a business proposal sent through an online proposal tool — clarity, ease of review, trust signals, and what ultimately drove their decision. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real reasoning behind an accept, decline, or stall, going beyond the surface-level rating. Built for sales, agency, and proposal-software teams who want to improve close rates.

テンプレートを見る