すべてのテンプレート
Sustainability & Impact

Consumer Trust in Carbon Offset Claims Survey

Measures consumer trust in corporate carbon-offset claims, preferences for emissions reductions vs. offsets, and willingness to pay a premium. Designed to inform ESG strategy, sustainability communications, and brand positioning.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全29問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this research study on carbon offsets and emissions reductions. This survey takes approximately 13 minutes. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for research purposes.

Q02
選択式

In the past 12 months, have you seen or heard companies make "carbon neutral" or carbon-offset claims?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
メッセージ

The next few questions ask how much you trust different types of carbon-offset claims companies make.

Q04
メッセージ

Now, think about what information would change how much you trust an offset claim. For each detail below, indicate how much it would increase or decrease your trust.

Q05
オピニオンスケール

When it comes to addressing their environmental impact, where should companies place greater emphasis?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Much greater emphasis on directly reducing emissions最大:Much greater emphasis on purchasing carbon offsets
Q06
オピニオンスケール

If you trusted a company's carbon-offset claims, how willing would you be to pay a premium for their product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all willing最大:Extremely willing
Q07
選択式

In the past 12 months, have you personally paid extra for carbon offsets (e.g., at checkout, for flights, or via donations)?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q08
自由回答(長文)

What would most increase your confidence in a company's carbon-offset claims?

Q09
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey—your perspectives are valuable and will help inform research on corporate climate action. Your responses have been recorded.

Q11
選択式

Where have you seen or heard these claims? (Select all that apply.)

  • On product packaging
  • On company websites
  • In advertisements (online, TV, print)
  • In-store signage
  • On social media
  • In sustainability or CSR reports
  • In news articles or press releases
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How much do you trust a company that claims: "We are carbon neutral"?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Do not trust at all最大:Trust completely
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How would your trust in a carbon-offset claim change if the company provided independent third-party verification of its offsets?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Greatly decrease my trust最大:Greatly increase my trust
Q14
ランク付け

Rank the following factors by how much they matter to you when evaluating a company's carbon-offset claims. (1 = most important)

  1. Evidence is specific and verifiable
  2. Offsets address only unavoidable emissions
  3. Environmental additionality is demonstrated
  4. Long-term monitoring is in place
  5. Cost-effectiveness of the offset
  6. Brand or company credibility
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to choose a product with credible carbon-offset claims over a similar product without such claims, if both are the same price?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q16
選択式

Where did you pay for carbon offsets? (Select all that apply.)

  • Air travel offset add-on
  • Retail checkout add-on (online or in-store)
  • Donation to a climate project
  • Utility or energy green tariff
  • Subscription to a climate or tree-planting program
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about companies' use of carbon offsets and their approach to climate action.

Q18
選択式

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How much do you trust a company that claims: "This product's carbon emissions have been fully offset"?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Do not trust at all最大:Trust completely
Q20
オピニオンスケール

How would your trust change if the company disclosed specific project details (e.g., location, project type, developer)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Greatly decrease my trust最大:Greatly increase my trust
Q21
ランク付け

Rank the following climate actions in order of where you think companies should invest most. (1 = highest priority)

  1. Emissions reductions in own operations
  2. Supplier and logistics decarbonization
  3. Product design and efficiency improvements
  4. High-quality nature-based offsets (e.g., reforestation)
  5. High-quality technology-based carbon removals
  6. Measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q22
プルダウン

Where do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
オピニオンスケール

How much do you trust a company that claims: "We offset X tonnes of CO₂ annually through verified projects"?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Do not trust at all最大:Trust completely
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How would your trust change if the company published a transparent cost breakdown showing how offset funds are spent?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Greatly decrease my trust最大:Greatly increase my trust
Q25
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
オピニオンスケール

How much do you trust a company that claims: "Certified carbon neutral by an independent third party"?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Do not trust at all最大:Trust completely
Q27
オピニオンスケール

How would your trust change if the company demonstrated that its offsets are additional (i.e., would not have happened without the company's funding)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Greatly decrease my trust最大:Greatly increase my trust
Q28
選択式

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
オピニオンスケール

How would your trust change if the company provided regular public progress reports on its offset projects?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Greatly decrease my trust最大:Greatly increase my trust

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a single trust rating by testing five distinct claim types (self-declared, product-level, tonnage-based, third-party certified) to see which specific wording actually builds credibility.
  • Includes a dedicated block on what would increase trust — independent verification, project detail disclosure, cost breakdowns, additionality, and progress reporting — giving ESG teams actionable levers, not just a score.
  • Pairs ranking questions (priority of reduction vs. offsetting, order of climate actions) with willingness-to-pay and choice-likelihood scales to connect trust directly to purchase behavior.
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes open-ended reasoning behind respondents' trust and WTP answers, plus an auto-generated report — depth a static claims-testing form can't produce.

SurveySparrow

Consumer Brand Preference Questionnaire Template | To know the effect of advertisement

This is a general brand-preference/advertising-effect template, not a carbon-offset or sustainability-claims instrument, so it would need heavy rebuilding to measure trust in ESG claims specifically. It's a fielding-ready template for its stated purpose, with SurveySparrow's usual conversational form style.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format that can improve completion rates
  • Ready-to-use template structure for measuring general brand perception

物足りない点

  • No content addressing carbon-offset trust, ESG claim types, or willingness-to-pay for sustainability premiums
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers

SurveyMonkey

Messaging/claims Testing Survey Template

This is a general-purpose claims/messaging-testing template, useful for gauging reaction to specific marketing statements but not built around carbon offsets, ESG trust drivers, or offset-related willingness to pay. It is a fielding-ready generic template that a sustainability team would need to substantially customize.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for testing how different message wording lands with audiences
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel tools

物足りない点

  • No carbon-offset-specific content (claim types, additionality, certification trust) out of the box
  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI interview to probe why a claim was or wasn't trusted
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology behind any AI-assisted analysis

よくあるご質問

「Consumer Trust in Carbon Offset Claims Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が29問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for participating in this research study on carbon offsets and emissions reductions. This survey…」・「In the past 12 months, have you seen or heard companies make "carbon neutral" or carbon-offset claims?」・「The next few questions ask how much you trust different types of carbon-offset claims companies make.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、29問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る