すべてのテンプレート
Sustainability & Impact

Consumer Trust in Green Claims & Evidence Preferences

Measures consumer credibility perceptions of environmental claims, preferred evidence types, and greenwashing experiences to inform sustainability messaging strategy.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey explores how people perceive and evaluate environmental claims on products and services. It should take approximately 7–8 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate. By continuing, you agree to participate in this research.

Q02
選択式

In the past 3 months, have you noticed any environmental or green claims on products while shopping or browsing online?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How credible does the term "eco-friendly" seem to you when used on a product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all credible最大:Extremely credible
Q04
選択式

In the past 12 months, have you felt misled by a green or environmental claim made by a brand or product?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q05
ランク付け

Rank the following types of evidence from most convincing (top) to least convincing (bottom) when evaluating a green claim.

  1. Independent certification logo (e.g., Fair Trade, B Corp)
  2. Summary of the product's total environmental impact
  3. Verified pollution or carbon footprint data
  4. QR code linking to detailed methodology
  5. Real-world case studies or usage examples
  6. The brand's own explanation of the claim
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q06
ランク付け

When choosing a product that includes a green claim, rank the following factors from most important (top) to least important (bottom).

  1. Price
  2. Product performance or quality
  3. Brand trust
  4. Independent proof of the claim
  5. Personal values or ethics
  6. Availability or convenience
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your views on green claims a bit further. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q08
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, do you have any suggestions for how brands should present green claims and supporting evidence?

Q09
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help us better understand how consumers evaluate environmental claims and what evidence builds genuine trust. Your feedback is greatly appreciated!

Q11
オピニオンスケール

When you see a green or environmental claim on a product, how often do you look for proof or evidence to support that claim?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How credible does the term "carbon neutral" seem to you when used on a product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all credible最大:Extremely credible
Q13
自由回答(長文)

Briefly describe what made the claim feel misleading.

Q14
プルダウン

How would you most prefer to access proof for a green claim when deciding whether to buy a product?

  • On-pack brief summary
  • QR code linking to a detailed page
  • Link on the online product page
  • In-store signage or shelf tag
  • Customer service on request
  • I don't need additional information
Q15
選択式

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Another identity
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How credible does the term "sustainably sourced" seem to you when used on a product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all credible最大:Extremely credible
Q17
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college, no degree
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How credible does the term "100% recyclable" seem to you when used on a product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all credible最大:Extremely credible
Q19
プルダウン

Which region do you currently live in?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
オピニオンスケール

How credible does the term "natural" seem to you when used on a product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all credible最大:Extremely credible

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes credibility ratings for five specific common green-claim terms (eco-friendly, carbon neutral, sustainably sourced, 100% recyclable, natural), not just generic messaging reactions
  • Captures real greenwashing experiences with a follow-up open-text question on what specifically felt misleading
  • Uses ranking questions to surface which evidence types and purchase factors actually drive trust, plus a dropdown on preferred proof format
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe deeper into respondents' views on green claims, something a static form can't do

SurveyMonkey

Messaging/claims Testing Survey Template

This is a general-purpose template for testing marketing messages and claims, not specific to environmental or green claims. It's a ready-to-field static survey backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analytics tools, but it doesn't address greenwashing perceptions or evidence-type preferences directly. Teams would need to heavily customize it to match the depth of a green-claims-specific study.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-field template usable immediately without custom build-out
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel infrastructure
  • Applicable to a wide range of message/claims testing use cases beyond sustainability

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up probing — respondents can't be asked deeper questions based on their specific answers
  • Not tailored to green/environmental claims, greenwashing experiences, or evidence-type ranking
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how questions or follow-ups are generated

よくあるご質問

「Consumer Trust in Green Claims & Evidence Preferences」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey explores how people perceive and evaluate environmental claims on products and services. It should…」・「In the past 3 months, have you noticed any environmental or green claims on products while shopping or browsing online?」・「How credible does the term "eco-friendly" seem to you when used on a product?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る