Consumer Trust in Fintech Sustainability Claims
Measures consumer trust, believability, and willingness to pay for sustainability features in fintech and banking. Designed for consumer panels to assess greenwashing risk and identify which green claims drive provider preference.
登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限
Welcome! This survey takes approximately 13 minutes and asks about your banking habits and views on sustainability claims from financial services providers. Your participation is voluntary—you may exit at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. By continuing, you agree to participate.
Powered by QuestionPunk
デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which of the following best describes the financial providers you currently use for everyday money management?
- Traditional bank or credit union only
- Fintech or neobank only
- Both traditional and fintech/neobank
- None of these
In the past 30 days, how often did you use a mobile banking or fintech app?
- Not at all
- A few times in the past month
- About once a week
- Several times a week
- About once a day
- Multiple times a day
In the past 3 months, have you noticed any sustainability or climate-related claims from banks or fintechs?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Where did you notice these sustainability or climate-related claims? Select all that apply.
- In-app messages or banners
- Email from provider
- Advertisements (online, video, or outdoor)
- Company website or blog
- Social media
- News or press coverage
- Receipts or statements
- Friends or family
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how much do you trust sustainability claims made by banks and fintechs?
How believable is the following claim: "Our card is carbon-neutral through verified offsets"?
How believable is the following claim: "We screen all investments using ESG criteria"?
How believable is the following claim: "Track your personal carbon footprint directly in the app"?
How important is independent third-party verification (e.g., certified labels) when evaluating sustainability claims from financial providers?
Please rank the following sustainability claim types by how important they are to you, with the most important at the top.
- Carbon-neutral or offset card
- Lower carbon footprint per transaction
- ESG-screened investments
- Recycled or biodegradable card materials
- Donations tied to spending
- Emissions tracking in app
If you had to choose between these two cards today, which would you select?
- 1.5% cashback, standard card (no sustainability features)
- 1.25% cashback, verified carbon-neutral card that plants trees with your spending
- No preference
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "I would accept lower rewards or cashback if the sustainability impact were independently verified."
How likely are you to choose or switch financial providers specifically because of stronger sustainability practices?
Would you be willing to pay an extra monthly fee for verified sustainability features (e.g., carbon offsets, impact tracking)?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
What is the most you would be willing to pay per month for verified sustainability features?
- $1–$2
- $3–$5
- $6–$10
- $11–$20
- More than $20
If expected returns were equal, which option would you choose for your savings or investments?
- ESG or impact option
- Conventional option
- No preference
- I don't currently save or invest
How appealing is a "Green Features" bundle that includes personal impact tracking and verified carbon offsets?
When choosing a financial card, please rank the following factors from most to least important to you.
- Rewards rate
- Fees
- Verified sustainability impact
- Customer service
- App features and usability
- Brand trust
What proof or information would most increase your trust in sustainability claims from financial providers?
We'd like to understand more about your views on sustainability in financial services. An AI moderator will ask you a few follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about sustainability features from financial services providers.
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
In which region do you currently reside?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
What is your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or trade/technical
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Homemaker or caregiver
- Unemployed and seeking work
- Unemployed and not seeking work
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
What is your approximate annual household income? (Optional)
- Under $25,000
- $25,000–$49,999
- $50,000–$74,999
- $75,000–$99,999
- $100,000–$149,999
- $150,000–$199,999
- $200,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey—your insights are valuable and will help improve how financial services communicate sustainability efforts. You may now close this page.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes belief-testing opinion-scale items on three specific green claims (carbon-neutral card, ESG screening, carbon footprint tracker) rather than generic preference questions
- Captures willingness-to-pay directly with a dedicated fee-tolerance question and a dropdown price ceiling, letting teams quantify the green premium
- Adds a ranking exercise for sustainability claim types and a separate ranking of card-choice factors, isolating which specific claims actually drive preference
- Closes with an AI follow-up interview and open-text reflection to probe trust and proof requirements qualitatively, something static form builders can't replicate
Jotform
Consumer Preference Survey Form TemplateA generic consumer preference form template, not built for fintech, sustainability, or greenwashing topics — it would need substantial rewriting to fit this use case. It's a fielding-ready static form rather than a research instrument tailored to trust or willingness-to-pay analysis.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization
- Broad library of general-purpose form templates
- Simple deployment for basic preference capture
物足りない点
- No fintech/sustainability-specific content or claim-belief testing
- Static form with no adaptive follow-up questioning
- No automated quality scoring or AI-generated reporting on responses
SurveySparrow
Consumer Brand Preference Questionnaire TemplateFramed around measuring advertisement effect on brand preference generally, not sustainability trust or fintech willingness-to-pay. Its conversational chat-style UI is a plus, but the content would need a full rebuild for greenwashing research.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style survey format
- Templated structure for brand preference research
- Likely supports basic skip logic
物足りない点
- No sustainability claim believability testing or WTP pricing questions
- No adaptive AI probing beyond scripted logic
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response scoring
Typeform
Consumer Preference Survey TemplateA polished, generic consumer preference template aimed at broad audience use rather than fintech sustainability specifically. Good for quick fielding of simple preference questions but lacks any greenwashing, trust, or pricing-sensitivity content out of the box.
優れている点
- Well-known clean, conversational UI/UX
- Fast to launch for simple preference studies
- Flexible question types for basic surveys
物足りない点
- No fintech/sustainability claim content or ranking exercises
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option
- No automated report generation tied to response quality
よくあるご質問
「Consumer Trust in Fintech Sustainability Claims」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が27問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Which of the following best describes the financial providers you currently use for everyday money management?」・「In the past 30 days, how often did you use a mobile banking or fintech app?」・「In the past 3 months, have you noticed any sustainability or climate-related claims from banks or fintechs?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、27問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。






