すべてのテンプレート
Privacy & Compliance

Contract Workflow Efficiency & Visibility Assessment

Assesses internal stakeholders' experience with contract workflow visibility, SLA adherence, and cycle times to identify process bottlenecks and prioritize improvements.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全21問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Contract Workflow Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with contract workflows over the past 6 months—specifically visibility, timelines, and process efficiency. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to inform process improvements. Participation is voluntary, and you may exit at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we want your honest perspective. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
選択式

Which best describes your involvement with contract workflows?

  • I negotiate contracts directly
  • I review, approve, or request contracts
  • I am not involved in contract workflows
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How clear is the end-to-end contract workflow in your organization today?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q04
プルダウン

Approximately how many calendar days does a typical standard contract take from intake to signature?

  • 1–5 days
  • 6–10 days
  • 11–20 days
  • 21–30 days
  • 31–45 days
  • 46–60 days
  • More than 60 days
  • Not sure
Q05
選択式

In the past 6 months, at which workflow stages did you most frequently encounter delays? (Select all that apply.)

  • Intake / request submission
  • Initial review and triage
  • Drafting
  • Internal review and approval
  • Negotiation / redlining
  • Final approval
  • Execution / signature
  • None — I did not experience significant delays
Q06
ランク付け

Rank the following improvements by their potential to increase contract workflow transparency or speed. (Place the most impactful at the top.)

  1. Greater status visibility / dashboard
  2. Clearer and enforced SLAs
  3. Higher-quality intake (forms, required fields)
  4. Template and playbook standardization
  5. Automated reminders and escalations
  6. Additional resourcing or coverage
  7. Self-service for low-risk agreements
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー

Thank you for your answers so far. I'd like to explore your contract workflow experiences in a bit more depth. Could you walk me through a recent situation where the contract process worked well or where it broke down?

Q08
選択式

Which function best describes your role?

  • Sales
  • Legal
  • Procurement
  • Finance
  • Operations
  • IT
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time. Your input will directly inform improvements to contract workflows and processes.

Q10
オピニオンスケール

Thinking about your contract requests in the past 6 months, how easy was it to see status updates?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q11
選択式

Does your team use documented SLAs for contract turnaround times?

  • Yes, for all standard requests
  • Yes, for some request types
  • No
  • Not sure
Q12
選択式

What are the most common causes of contract delays you experienced in the past 6 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • Unclear or incomplete intake requirements
  • High volume of redlines
  • Waiting on internal approvers
  • Template or clause mismatches
  • Team capacity constraints
  • Tooling or system limitations
  • External counterparty delays
  • Competing priorities
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
自由回答(長文)

What is the single most impactful change that could be made to contract workflows this quarter?

Q14
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, is there any additional context about contract workflow transparency or timelines you'd like to share?

Q15
選択式

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director
  • VP+
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

Thinking of your most recent contract request, how well were timeline expectations set at kickoff?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q17
オピニオンスケール

When SLAs exist, how often were they met over the past 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Rarely met最大:Almost always met
Q18
プルダウン

How long have you worked at your organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
選択式

How do you currently track the status of your contract requests?

  • A system dashboard (e.g., CLM tool)
  • A shared tracker (e.g., spreadsheet)
  • Ad hoc updates (e.g., email, Slack)
  • I don't have a way to track status
  • Other (please specify)
Q20
選択式

Where do you primarily work?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
選択式

Which region do you primarily support?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Multiple regions
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs quantitative opinion-scale questions (workflow clarity, ease of initiating requests, SLA adherence) with a ranking exercise and open-text prompts to both measure and explain bottlenecks.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview segment that adaptively probes deeper into a respondent's specific contract workflow experience after the structured questions.
  • Captures function, role level, tenure, work location, and region so results can be segmented by stakeholder type rather than treated as one aggregate score.
  • Uses targeted multiple-choice questions on workflow stage and delay causes to help pinpoint where in the process bottlenecks actually occur, not just that they exist.

SurveySparrow

Internal Audit Risk Assessment Questionnaire

This is a fielding-ready internal assessment questionnaire aimed at the same type of internal-stakeholder audience, but its content is built around audit and risk controls rather than contract workflow, SLA adherence, or cycle-time visibility. It's the closest structural analog among available competitors (an internal process-assessment survey) rather than a topic match.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built internal assessment questionnaire format aimed at employee/stakeholder respondents
  • SurveySparrow's conversational survey UI is known to support multi-channel distribution
  • Ready to deploy as-is for a related internal-assessment use case

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual risk or process answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
  • Content is oriented to audit/risk controls, not contract-specific workflow stages, SLAs, or cycle times

よくあるご質問

「Contract Workflow Efficiency & Visibility Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Contract Workflow Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with contract workflows over the pa…」・「Which best describes your involvement with contract workflows?」・「How clear is the end-to-end contract workflow in your organization today?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る