すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Internal Process Time-Waste & Automation Opportunity Survey

Pinpoints which internal processes waste the most employee time, how often people route around official steps with workarounds, and which tasks are the best candidates for automation. Built for ops, IT, or PMO teams doing a process-improvement audit; the AI follow-up reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers so you know exactly what to fix first.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全15問・約8分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this one. We're mapping out which internal processes cost the most time and where people build workarounds, so we can prioritize fixes and automation. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes, and honest answers (even 'I skip that step') are exactly what we need.

Q02
選択式必須

Which of the following processes do you interact with at least monthly? (Template note: replace this list with your organization's actual core processes, e.g. expense reporting, ticket routing, onboarding, procurement approvals.)

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
  • (Replace with process specific to your org)
Q03
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Across the processes below, which wastes the MOST of your time and which wastes the LEAST? (Template note: swap in the 6-9 processes most relevant to your organization.)

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Wastes the most time最も悪い:Wastes the least time
Q04
数値必須

In a typical week, how many hours do you estimate you spend on manual, repetitive, or duplicate work caused by these processes?

Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

In the last 30 days, how often did you use an unofficial workaround (a spreadsheet, a side channel, a manual fix) instead of following the official process?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Never used a workaround最大:Used one almost every time
Q06
マトリクス必須

How often does each of the following happen to you at work?

4行 × 5列
  • I redo work because a system or process failed the first time
  • I wait on someone else's manual approval before I can proceed
  • I re-enter the same data into more than one system
  • I ask a colleague how to get around a slow official step
列: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Almost always
Q07
選択式

For which of these processes do you (or your team) regularly use a workaround instead of the documented steps? (Template note: mirror the process list used earlier.)

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
Q08
自由回答(長文)

Briefly describe the workaround you use most often and why the official process didn't work for that situation.

Q09
選択式必須

Which single process would you most want automated or streamlined first?

  • Expense reporting / reimbursement
  • IT ticket submission
  • Procurement / purchase approvals
  • Employee onboarding paperwork
  • Time tracking or timesheets
  • Status reporting to management
  • Vendor or contract approvals
Q10
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that automating this process would actually save meaningful time, without creating new problems?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not confident at all最大:Extremely confident
Q11
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific process the respondent flagged as the biggest time-waster or automation candidate: walk through the exact steps they take today, where the delay or duplication actually happens, and what tool or manual fix they lean on instead. If they mentioned a workaround, get concrete detail on how it's done and who else relies on it, since that reveals hidden risk. If they said they're not confident automation would help, probe what past attempt or system limitation makes them skeptical.

Q12
メッセージ

Almost done — just a couple of quick background questions to help us group the findings by team.

Q13
選択式

Which department or function do you primarily work in? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list.)

  • Operations
  • Finance
  • IT / Engineering
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • HR / People
  • Marketing
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
選択式

How long have you worked at the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a process-improvement backlog we'll use to prioritize fixes and automation over the next planning cycle.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated MaxDiff question to force-rank which processes waste the most time, not just a generic satisfaction scale
  • Pairs quantitative workaround-frequency questions (rating-scale, matrix) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers
  • Closes with a open-text + AI interview combo specifically aimed at extracting 'why the official process doesn't work,' turning vague complaints into concrete process-fix candidates
  • Ends in an auto-generated report designed for ops/IT/PMO teams to prioritize automation targets, not just a raw response export

Jotform

Process Improvement Survey Form Template

A static, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive questioning. Good for basic feedback collection, not deep root-cause investigation.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization
  • Part of a large, mature form template library
  • Simple to deploy quickly

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual answers
  • No mechanism to reconstruct specific workaround steps behind a time-waste report
  • No automated per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Tool And Process Improvement Survey Template

A standard static survey template from an established survey platform, likely paired with SurveyMonkey's benchmarking and analytics features. It's ready to field but built around fixed-choice and scale questions rather than conversational follow-up.

優れている点

  • Backed by a well-known, established survey platform
  • Likely includes analytics/benchmarking dashboards
  • Straightforward to launch at scale

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into individual open-ended answers
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology for how follow-ups would be generated

SurveySparrow

Process Improvement Survey Template

A conversational-style form template with sample questions, good for a friendlier respondent experience. It's still a fixed, pre-scripted question flow rather than a dynamic AI-driven interview that adapts to each answer.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like UI for higher completion rates
  • Includes sample questions to speed up setup
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

物足りない点

  • Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No mechanism to reconstruct workaround steps behind a flagged answer
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

Typeform

Process Improvement Survey Template

A polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time template known for strong design and UX. It's a static template with predefined questions and branching logic, not a genuinely adaptive AI interview.

優れている点

  • Strong visual design and respondent experience
  • Simple logic-based branching between questions
  • Widely used, familiar tool for internal surveys

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No built-in method to reconstruct the specific steps behind a reported workaround

よくあるご質問

「Internal Process Time-Waste & Automation Opportunity Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が15問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this one. We're mapping out which internal processes cost the most time and where peo…」・「Which of the following processes do you interact with at least monthly? (Template note: replace this list with your orga…」・「Across the processes below, which wastes the MOST of your time and which wastes the LEAST? (Template note: swap in the 6…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、15問を約8分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る