QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Statement of Work Clarity & Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates how clearly a Statement of Work defined scope, deliverables, timelines, pricing, and change control for a specific client-vendor engagement, and how well execution matched what was written. Built for procurement, PMO, and agency teams reviewing SOW quality after project close, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the Statement of Work for this engagement. Your answers help us write clearer, more useful SOWs for future projects. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式

Which best describes your role in this engagement?

  • Client sponsor or business stakeholder
  • Client project manager
  • Vendor or agency project lead
  • Vendor or agency delivery team member
  • Procurement or legal reviewer
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Before the project began, how clearly did the Statement of Work define the scope of work?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not clear at all最大:Extremely clear
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How well did the final deliverables match what was described in the Statement of Work?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Did not match at all最大:Matched completely
Q05
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this Statement of Work?

5行 × 5列
  • Milestones and the overall timeline were realistic
  • Pricing and payment terms were clearly explained
  • Roles and responsibilities were clearly assigned to named parties
  • Acceptance criteria for deliverables were specific and measurable
  • The process for requesting and approving changes was clearly defined
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
選択式必須

Did this engagement require changes to scope, timeline, or budget beyond what the original Statement of Work covered?

  • No changes were needed
  • Yes, minor changes
  • Yes, significant changes
  • Not sure
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

Which of these areas of the Statement of Work most need improvement for future engagements?

  • Scope definition
  • Timeline and milestones
  • Pricing structure
  • Payment terms
  • Roles and responsibilities
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Change order process
  • Communication cadence
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most needs improvement最も悪い:Least needs improvement
Q08
評価スケール必須

Overall, how well did the Statement of Work serve as a governance tool for keeping this project on track?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor governance tool最大:Excellent governance tool
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct one specific moment during this engagement where the Statement of Work either prevented a problem or failed to prevent one — for example, a scope disagreement, an unclear deliverable, or a change order dispute. Ask what the SOW actually said at that point, what each side expected, and how the gap (if any) got resolved. If the respondent rated the SOW highly on all closed questions, probe for a near-miss they caught early instead of assuming nothing went wrong.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

What's one thing that should have been spelled out in the Statement of Work but wasn't?

Q11
選択式

Roughly how large is your organization?

  • 1-50 employees
  • 51-250 employees
  • 251-1,000 employees
  • 1,001-5,000 employees
  • 5,000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback feeds directly into a review of our Statement of Work template and process, so future engagements start with clearer expectations on all sides.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to reconstruct the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction, going beyond a static rating.
  • Pairs opinion-scale questions on scope clarity and deliverable match with a matrix statement-agreement question, so you get both quantifiable scores and nuanced sentiment on the same SOW.
  • Uses MaxDiff to force-rank which SOW sections (scope, deliverables, timeline, pricing, change control) most need improvement, giving PMO/procurement teams a prioritized fix list instead of generic feedback.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean procurement and PMO teams can review post-project SOW performance across many engagements without manually reading every open-ended answer.

SurveySparrow

Free Statement of Work Template

This is a form template for drafting/collecting the contents of a Statement of Work document (scope, deliverables, terms) at the start of an engagement, not a survey for evaluating how well a completed SOW performed after project close. It's fielding-ready as a data-capture form but built for the opposite point in the project lifecycle from QuestionPunk's retrospective evaluation template. Useful as a SOW intake tool, but not a comparable post-mortem instrument.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready form builder on an established survey platform
  • Likely offers customizable fields for standard SOW components (scope, pricing, timeline)
  • Familiar SurveySparrow UI for distribution and response collection

物足りない点

  • Designed to help create a SOW, not to assess after-the-fact clarity or execution match against a signed SOW
  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct specific friction moments from scope ambiguity or change orders
  • No published methodology for quality scoring or automated post-engagement reporting

よくあるご質問

「Statement of Work Clarity & Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the Statement of Work for this engagement. Your answers help us write clea…」・「Which best describes your role in this engagement?」・「Before the project began, how clearly did the Statement of Work define the scope of work?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Parts Request & Fulfillment Experience Survey

Measures how easily technicians, mechanics, and maintenance staff can request, track, and receive the right parts — covering speed, accuracy, availability communication, and channel preference. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the most recent problematic request to pinpoint exactly where the process breaks down. Built for parts suppliers, distributors, and internal procurement teams.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

SaaS Procurement Workflow Audit Survey

Evaluates the efficiency and pain points across SaaS request, approval, and renewal workflows. Designed for IT, procurement, finance, and operational stakeholders to identify bottlenecks and prioritize process improvements.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Contract Workflow Efficiency & Visibility Assessment

Assesses internal stakeholders' experience with contract workflow visibility, SLA adherence, and cycle times to identify process bottlenecks and prioritize improvements.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Strategic Plan Clarity, Alignment, and Execution Survey

Gauges whether employees or leaders understand the organization's strategic priorities, believe resources and daily work are aligned to them, and feel confident execution will succeed — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real barriers behind low-confidence or low-alignment answers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Supplier Service Performance Evaluation Survey

Gathers structured performance ratings and behavioral feedback on a supplier's delivery, quality, and responsiveness, for procurement and vendor management teams conducting periodic reviews. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the lowest-rated area so scorecards reflect what actually happened, not just a number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Organizational SWOT Analysis Survey

Collects structured input from employees and leaders on your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, then uses a trade-off exercise and an AI follow-up interview to surface which single factor matters most right now and why. Built for strategy teams prepping a SWOT before a planning cycle or board review.

テンプレートを見る