QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Marketing & Growth

Design & Creative Feedback Review

Structured stakeholder or customer feedback on a design, mockup, or creative asset: first impressions, a click on what draws attention, ratings against the brief, and file upload for marked-up versions. The AI interviewer converts 'I just don't like it' into usable direction.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全9問・約6分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for reviewing this design! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. You'll react to the work, rate it against what it needs to achieve, and explain your thinking. Honest beats polite — the designer wants direction, not applause. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

What's your relationship to this project?

  • I requested this work
  • Stakeholder in the outcome
  • Fellow designer
  • Target customer or user
Q03
自由回答（短文）必須

First impression: without overthinking, what three words describe this design?

Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How clearly does the design communicate its main message?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:I can't tell what it's saying最大:Instantly clear
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How well does it fit the brand as you understand it?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Off-brand最大:Perfectly on-brand
Q06
選択式必須

What should happen with this design?

  • Ship it as is
  • Ship with minor tweaks
  • Needs another iteration
  • Wrong direction — rethink
Q07
AIインタビュー

Turn the reviewer's reaction into actionable direction: which specific element drove their overall verdict, what they would change FIRST and what that change accomplishes, what must NOT change, and whether their concerns are about craft (execution) or strategy (the idea itself). If they said 'wrong direction,' probe what the right direction solves that this one doesn't.

Q08
設問

Optional: upload a marked-up version, reference example, or anything that shows what you mean.

Q09
メッセージ

Feedback delivered — thank you! Everything is compiled into a single themed summary for the design team, with disagreements surfaced instead of averaged away.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Converts 'I just don't like it' into direction: the AI separates craft critiques from strategy critiques and asks what must NOT change
  • Captures reviewer role and gut-reaction words before ratings, so you can weight feedback by stakeholder type
  • Marked-up file uploads and a ship/iterate/rethink verdict give the design team an actionable decision, not a score
  • Disagreements between reviewers are surfaced in the summary instead of averaged away

Jotform

Creative Design Feedback Survey Form Template

A clean design-feedback form that captures reviewer identity/role, a star rating for visual appeal, a design-aspect evaluation matrix, and open-ended liked/improve/comments fields plus a follow-up flag. Strong for standardized, consistent stakeholder input, but it is a one-shot form with no way to review the actual artifact interactively or probe vague feedback.

優れている点

  • Captures reviewer name, email, and project-relationship role to contextualize each response
  • Mixes quantitative (star rating for visual appeal, design-aspect matrix, satisfaction scale) with qualitative open-text
  • Structured 'most liked / suggested improvements / additional comments' fields keep feedback actionable
  • Follow-up discussion status field to route responses that need a conversation

物足りない点

  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up when a reviewer says something is 'off' but not why
  • No mechanism to present/annotate the actual design artifact inside the flow; it references the work by name only
  • No voice option for reviewers to talk through their reaction
  • No auto-synthesized report aggregating and theming feedback across reviewers

Ziflow

Design Feedback Template (Creative Review & Approval)

A structured creative-review template with a creative-brief header, review criteria (visual, functionality, content, brand alignment), works-well/improve/suggestions sections, action items assigned to people, and a four-level approval status. Strong on driving specific, decision-oriented feedback and formal approval, but as a blog template it standardizes fields rather than offering adaptive interviewing or in-app markup.

優れている点

  • Creative-brief header ties feedback back to project goals for context
  • Explicit review criteria across visual elements, functionality/UX, content accuracy, and brand alignment
  • Action-items section assigning specific tasks to named individuals
  • Four-level approval status (approved / minor changes / major revisions / rejected) with next steps and deadlines

物足りない点

  • Standardized fields only; no AI that asks a reviewer a targeted follow-up on a specific critique
  • The template itself is a document structure, not an environment where reviewers annotate the live artifact
  • No voice modality for stakeholders to narrate their reaction
  • No automated roll-up of multi-reviewer feedback into a synthesized report

Asana

Creative Asset Feedback and Approval Template

A workflow-oriented template that moves assets through review stages (in production, ready for review, needs changes, approved) with criterion-level feedback, version control, due dates, and a recommended 3-5 reviewer set spanning design/brand/compliance. Strong on process, revision tracking, and approval routing, but feedback is comment fields on tasks rather than an interviewed, synthesized understanding of reviewer reasoning.

優れている点

  • Kanban-style review stages (in production, ready for review, needs changes, approved) for clear status
  • Criterion-level feedback sections plus creative-brief reference for context
  • Version control guidance so reviewers always evaluate the latest asset
  • Recommends 3-5 reviewers covering design, brand, and compliance perspectives

物足りない点

  • Feedback is free-text comments on tasks; no AI follow-up to clarify or deepen a vague note
  • No voice-AI interview for stakeholders to talk through their review
  • No in-flow presentation of the artifact with adaptive questioning; it manages the asset, reviewers open files separately
  • No auto-generated synthesis of what reviewers collectively want changed

よくあるご質問

「Design & Creative Feedback Review」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が9問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for reviewing this design! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. You'll react to the work, r…」・「What's your relationship to this project?」・「First impression: without overthinking, what three words describe this design?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、9問を約6分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Marketing & Growth

First-Click Test: Findability & Visual Priority

Where do people click first when given a task on your design? First-click success is one of the strongest predictors of task completion. Upload your screenshot, set the task, and let the AI interviewer ask what they expected to happen — turning a click map into a usability diagnosis.

テンプレートを見る
Marketing & Growth

Email Design & Visual Experience Feedback Survey

Evaluates how recipients actually experience your marketing or product emails — layout, readability, mobile rendering, and visual hierarchy — rather than just open and click rates. An AI follow-up interview digs into what made a specific recent email easy or hard to act on, surfacing design friction that analytics alone won't show.

テンプレートを見る
Marketing & Growth

Graphic Design Request Intake & Creative Brief Survey

Captures a complete brief for an internal or client graphic design request — project type, goal, audience, brand constraints, and priority trade-offs — so designers stop guessing what 'good' looks like. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real goal behind the ask and surfaces conflicting stakeholder expectations before work begins.

テンプレートを見る
Marketing & Growth

Product & Service Design Feedback Survey

Captures how people actually use your product or service, which features matter most, and where the experience breaks down — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a respondent got stuck or frustrated. Built for product, UX, and service design teams shaping a roadmap.

テンプレートを見る
Marketing & Growth

Logo Design Testing & Brand Impression Survey

Captures gut-level reactions to a logo (or set of logo options): first impression, word associations, attribute fit, and relative preference — plus an AI follow-up that digs into which specific design element (color, shape, type, symbol) is actually driving the reaction. Built for brand, design, and marketing teams validating a new or refreshed mark before launch.

テンプレートを見る
Marketing & Growth

Website Design & Usability Feedback Survey

Measures how easily visitors navigate your site, how the visual design lands, and which design elements most need work — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment a visitor got confused or stuck instead of just a satisfaction score. Built for product, UX, and marketing teams evaluating a live site or redesign.

テンプレートを見る