Employee Computer Security Awareness & Behavior Survey
Measures how employees actually handle passwords, multi-factor authentication, updates, and suspicious messages day to day — not just what they know in theory. Built for IT and security teams auditing awareness programs, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real near-miss or incident instead of a hypothetical one.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
How often do you do each of the following at work?
- Use a different password for each work account
- Turn on multi-factor authentication when it's offered
- Lock your screen when stepping away from your desk
- Install security updates within a few days of release
- Report suspicious emails or messages to IT/security
How confident are you that you could spot a phishing email or message aimed at you?
In the last 12 months, which of the following happened to you at work? (Select all that apply)
- Clicked a link or opened an attachment I later suspected was malicious
- Got a suspicious login alert or had an account temporarily locked
- Used a personal device or workaround to get around a security restriction
- Reported a phishing attempt to IT/security
- None of the above
Which of these would do the most, and the least, to improve security where you work?
- Company-provided password manager
- Mandatory multi-factor authentication on all systems
- Regular phishing simulation exercises
- Shorter, more frequent security training sessions
- Faster patching/updates on company devices
- A clearer process for reporting suspicious activity
- Stronger endpoint protection/antivirus tools
How would you rate the support you get from IT/security when you have a question or concern?
In the last 12 months, how many times has your company provided security training (e.g., phishing simulations, workshops, mandatory modules)?
- None
- Once
- Two or three times
- Four or more times
- Not sure
Reconstruct the respondent's most recent security incident or near-miss at work — what happened, how they noticed something was off (or didn't), what they did next, and whether they reported it. Anchor on specifics: the type of message or event, the time pressure they were under, and what tool or step (if any) would have stopped it earlier. If they say nothing has ever happened to them, probe what would make them pause before clicking a link or attachment today.
What's the one thing that would make it easier for you to follow good security practices at work?
Which best describes your team or department?
- Engineering/IT
- Sales/Marketing
- Finance/Operations
- Customer Support
- HR/People
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How large is your organization?
- Under 50
- 50-250
- 251-1,000
- 1,001-5,000
- More than 5,000
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed into a report on real-world security habits and gaps, which IT and security teams will use to shape upcoming training and tools.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a matrix question on how often employees actually perform day-to-day security behaviors (password habits, updates, etc.), not just attitudes
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct a real recent near-miss or incident instead of relying on a generic hypothetical scenario
- Pairs a self-rated confidence scale on spotting phishing with a max-diff question ranking what would most improve security, giving both perception and priority data
- Closes with an open short-text question on what would make good security practices easier, plus context questions (team, org size) so IT/security teams can segment the auto-generated report
QuestionPro
Computer security survey questions + sample questionnaire templateThis is a sample questionnaire and question-bank page rather than a single fielding-ready survey instance, aimed at giving survey builders a starting question set. It covers general computer security topics but reads more like reference content than a purpose-built behavior audit. Useful for browsing question ideas, less so as a ready-to-send employee survey.
優れている点
- Provides a broad bank of computer security question examples
- Backed by an established survey platform with standard reporting/analytics tooling
物足りない点
- Static question list with no adaptive follow-up to probe individual incidents
- No mechanism to reconstruct a specific near-miss or automatically score response quality
Jotform
Security Awareness Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, oriented toward quick internal distribution. It's a static question set that can be edited but doesn't adapt based on answers. Good for basic awareness check-ins, not for deep behavioral or incident-level detail.
優れている点
- Easy to customize and deploy quickly via a familiar form builder
- Supports standard form logic like conditional show/hide fields
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interviewing or voice interview option to dig into real incidents
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Security Awareness Survey TemplateA prebuilt static template on a mainstream survey platform, likely covering general awareness and training-recall questions similar to a standard knowledge check. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analytics features, but the questionnaire itself is fixed once deployed. There's no indication of incident reconstruction or behavior-specific drill-down.
優れている点
- Widely used platform with strong distribution and baseline analytics
- Quick to launch with minimal setup for general awareness pulse checks
物足りない点
- Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up questioning
- No voice-based interview option or automated quality scoring of open responses
SurveySparrow
Information Security Risk Assessment QuestionnaireThis template is framed as a risk assessment questionnaire, which overlaps with security awareness but leans more toward organizational/compliance risk scoring than individual day-to-day behavior. It's a static form, though SurveySparrow's platform does support conversational-style UI for surveys. It's a reasonable adjacent option but not purpose-built to capture personal near-miss incidents.
優れている点
- Conversational chat-style survey UI can feel less clinical than a plain form
- Template framing suits broader risk/compliance assessment use cases
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up to reconstruct a specific incident
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
よくあるご質問
「Employee Computer Security Awareness & Behavior Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this — it helps our security and IT teams understand what actually happens day-to-day…」・「How often do you do each of the following at work?」・「How confident are you that you could spot a phishing email or message aimed at you?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。