すべてのテンプレート
Privacy & Compliance

Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey

Measures how well employees recognize threats, follow security policy, and actually behave when something looks suspicious — not just what training they sat through. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt to surface the gaps that policy audits miss.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're checking how security training actually shows up in day-to-day decisions — there are no wrong answers, and this isn't tied to any individual review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 12 months, which security awareness training have you completed?

  • General security awareness course
  • Phishing simulation exercise
  • Data handling / privacy training
  • Remote work security training
  • None that I can recall
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that you could correctly identify a phishing email if one landed in your inbox today?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often have you encountered an email, text, or message that seemed suspicious?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more often
Q05
選択式必須

Thinking about the most recent suspicious message you saw, what did you actually do?

  • Reported it through the official channel
  • Deleted or ignored it without reporting
  • Clicked a link or opened an attachment before realizing
  • Forwarded it to a coworker to check
  • Wasn't sure what to do, so did nothing
Q06
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about security at your organization?

4行 × 5列
  • I know exactly how to report a suspected phishing attempt
  • I would feel comfortable reporting a mistake I made without fear of punishment
  • Our security policies are written in a way I can actually understand
  • My manager visibly follows good security practices
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)

Which of these security topics would be most and least valuable to cover in future training?

  • Spotting phishing emails and texts
  • Creating and managing strong passwords
  • Securing home and remote work networks
  • Recognizing phone-based social engineering
  • Physical security (badges, tailgating, visitors)
  • Handling sensitive customer or company data
  • Safe use of cloud storage and file sharing
  • Mobile device and app security
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable最も悪い:Least valuable
Q08
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to walk through the last time they felt even briefly unsure about a message, link, or request — what made it feel off, what they actually did in the moment, and whether they told anyone. If they say they'd always report something, probe for a specific counterexample or reason reporting felt awkward, slow, or pointless. If they can't recall any suspicious moment, ask what would make them notice one.

Q09
選択式必須

If you suspected your account had been compromised right now, would you know exactly who to contact?

  • Yes, I know exactly who
  • I have a rough idea
  • No, I would have to search for it
Q10
評価スケール

How would you rate the format and length of the security training you've received?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your department?

  • Engineering / IT
  • Sales / Marketing
  • Finance / Legal
  • Operations / HR
  • Customer Support
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you. Your answers, along with everyone else's, will be used to shape more relevant, less generic security training and to fix any gaps in how easy it is to report concerns.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt, surfacing behavioral gaps that policy audits and static forms miss
  • Combines standard awareness questions (training completed, confidence identifying phishing, incident response know-how) with a matrix on agreement about security culture and a max-diff prioritization of future training topics
  • Asks what respondents actually did the last time they saw a suspicious message, not just what they were trained on, distinguishing stated policy knowledge from real behavior
  • Closes with a transparent chat-based explanation of how responses will be used, and produces an auto-generated report for HR/security teams without manual tallying

Jotform

Security Awareness Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering general security awareness questions, easily customizable within Jotform's form builder. It relies on fixed multiple-choice and rating items rather than any adaptive follow-up. Good for quick deployment but not built to probe individual incidents in depth.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, fully customizable form builder
  • Simple to deploy and embed across channels
  • Part of a broad, well-known survey/form ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific hesitation or incident
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No documented methodology or transparent prompt logic

SurveyMonkey

Security Awareness Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready template of fixed questions on security training and awareness, benefiting from SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It captures self-reported knowledge and attitudes but not real-time behavioral detail. There is no mechanism to explore a specific recent suspicious-message experience beyond a checkbox answer.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking tools
  • Easy to launch, distribute, and track responses
  • Familiar respondent experience

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore a specific moment of doubt
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No transparent, per-question methodology disclosure

SurveySparrow

Information Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire

This is framed more broadly as an organizational risk-assessment questionnaire rather than an employee-behavior/phishing-specific survey, so it's a partial match. It's a fielding-ready static template with SurveySparrow's conversational UI, but questions are fixed rather than adaptive. Best suited to compliance-style risk scoring rather than uncovering individual behavioral gaps.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like survey UI improves completion rates
  • Positioned for broader risk-assessment/compliance use cases
  • Supports standard question branching logic

物足りない点

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to probe a specific recent incident
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • Static questionnaire structure, not adaptive to individual answers

よくあるご質問

「Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're checking how security training actually shows up in day-to-day decisions…」・「In the last 12 months, which security awareness training have you completed?」・「How confident are you that you could correctly identify a phishing email if one landed in your inbox today?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る