すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Employee Guarantor Requirement Experience Survey

Evaluates how employees experience your organization's guarantor requirement — for salary advances, employment bonds, or equipment custody — including clarity, difficulty finding a guarantor, and perceived fairness. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually slowed or complicated the process, giving HR concrete input for simplifying or replacing it.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience with our guarantor requirement — the process for finding someone to vouch for you for things like salary advances, equipment custody, or your employment contract. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 8 minutes and your honest feedback helps us improve the process.

Q02
選択式必須

For which purpose did you most recently need to provide a guarantor at this company?

  • Salary advance or loan
  • Employment contract or bond
  • Company property custody (e.g., laptop, vehicle)
  • Housing or relocation assistance
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How clearly were the guarantor requirements explained to you before you needed to provide one?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not clear at all最大:Extremely clear
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How difficult was it to find someone willing and eligible to act as your guarantor?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very easy最大:Very difficult
Q05
数値

In the last 12 months, how many times have you been asked to provide or renew guarantor information?

Q06
選択式

Which of the following best describes the person you provided as a guarantor?

  • Family member
  • Friend
  • Colleague at this company
  • Former employer or manager
  • Other professional acquaintance
  • Other
Q07
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with the following statements about the guarantor process?

4行 × 5列
  • The requirement was clearly communicated during onboarding
  • The verification process was completed within a reasonable time
  • The requirement felt fair given my role and salary level
  • HR was supportive if I struggled to find a guarantor
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q08
評価スケール必須

Overall, how would you rate your experience with the guarantor process?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q09
ランク付け

If we were to change how guarantee is handled, rank these alternatives from most to least preferred.

  1. Keep the current guarantor system
  2. Contract-based indemnity (no external guarantor needed)
  3. Employer-arranged insurance or bond
  4. Refundable salary deduction agreement
  5. Digital reference/background verification instead of a named guarantor
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q10
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct exactly what happened the last time this employee had to provide a guarantor: what was required, how long it took, who they approached (and whether anyone declined), and where the process broke down or felt unfair. If they rated the experience poorly or difficulty finding a guarantor highly, dig into the specific obstacle (e.g., no qualifying family/colleague, distance, documentation) and what alternative arrangement would have solved it for them.

Q11
選択式

Which department are you part of?

  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Finance
  • Human Resources
  • Engineering/IT
  • Customer Support
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
プルダウン

How long have you worked at this company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1 to 3 years
  • 3 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

What is your employment type?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contract
  • Temporary
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be reviewed by HR to identify friction points and consider fairer or simpler alternatives to the current guarantor process.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond collecting guarantor paperwork by measuring how clearly requirements were explained and how difficult it was to actually find an eligible guarantor, using paired opinion-scale questions.
  • Includes a matrix of agreement statements and an overall rating to quantify perceived fairness, plus a ranking question so HR can see which alternative guarantee mechanisms employees would actually prefer.
  • An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened the last time the employee had to provide a guarantor, surfacing the real friction points behind the scale scores rather than just a satisfaction number.
  • Segments results by department, tenure, and employment type, and tracks 12-month frequency of guarantor requests, so patterns (e.g., high-turnover departments struggling most) are visible in the auto-generated report.

SurveySparrow

Employee Guarantor Form - Secure Employment Agreements

This is the closest topical match, but it is framed as a form for capturing and formalizing a guarantor's details and agreement, not a survey for measuring employee experience with the requirement. It appears to be a fielding-ready form rather than a research instrument built to probe clarity, difficulty, or fairness perceptions.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the guarantor use case, so terminology and fields likely map directly onto real employment-bond workflows
  • Backed by a general-purpose survey/form platform, so it benefits from broad customization and distribution tools
  • Framed around 'securing' agreements, suggesting it's optimized for formal documentation and record-keeping

物足りない点

  • Appears to be a static form for capturing guarantor data, not a survey designed to measure clarity, difficulty, or fairness of the requirement itself
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview to reconstruct what actually happened during a guarantor search
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published question/prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Employee Guarantor Requirement Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience with our guarantor requirement — the process for finding someon…」・「For which purpose did you most recently need to provide a guarantor at this company?」・「How clearly were the guarantor requirements explained to you before you needed to provide one?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る