QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Employee Probationary Period Performance Evaluation

A structured manager assessment of how a new hire is performing during their probationary period, covering core competencies, training support, and readiness for confirmed employment. An AI follow-up interview probes the concrete incidents and evidence behind the manager's recommendation rather than just the rating, producing feedback the employee can actually act on.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking the time to complete this probationary period evaluation. Your honest, specific feedback helps determine the right next step for this employee and gives them clear, fair input. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
マトリクス必須

Rate this employee's performance during the probationary period on each of the following:

7行 × 4列
  • Job knowledge and skills
  • Quality of work
  • Reliability and attendance
  • Communication
  • Teamwork and collaboration
  • ほか2件
列: Below expectations · Approaching expectations · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance during the probationary period?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Far below expectations最大:Far exceeds expectations
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did this employee complete assigned tasks without needing significant rework or correction?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Always
Q05
選択式必須

Did this employee receive the training, tools, and support they needed to succeed in this role?

  • Yes, fully
  • Mostly
  • Partially
  • No
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these areas is most in need of development for this employee, and which is least in need?

  • Technical or job-specific skills
  • Communication
  • Time management
  • Attention to detail
  • Collaboration with the team
  • Initiative
  • Responsiveness to feedback
  • Professionalism
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most in need of development最も悪い:Least in need of development
Q07
選択式必須

Based on this employee's performance, what is your recommendation for their employment status?

  • Confirm employment - performance meets or exceeds expectations
  • Extend the probationary period to allow more time for improvement
  • Terminate employment - performance has not met expectations
  • Undecided - I need further discussion before deciding
Q08
AIインタビュー

Anchor on the manager's recommendation for this employee's employment status and ask them to walk through 1-2 specific, concrete incidents or examples that best illustrate why. Probe for what changed (or didn't) over the probationary period, and if the recommendation is 'extend' or 'undecided', ask exactly what measurable improvement would need to happen and by when. If the manager rated performance highly but recommends termination or extension (or vice versa), gently surface and clarify that inconsistency.

Q09
評価スケール必須

How confident are you in this recommendation?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not confident at all最大:Extremely confident
Q10
自由回答（長文）

What specific feedback would help this employee understand your evaluation and know how to improve or what to keep doing? (This may be shared with them.)

Q11
選択式

How long have you directly supervised this employee?

  • Less than 30 days
  • 30-60 days
  • 60-90 days
  • More than 90 days
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What department does this employee work in?

  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Engineering/Technical
  • Administration
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this evaluation. Your responses will be used to finalize the employment decision and shared with HR to support consistent, well-documented probationary reviews.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines a structured competency matrix, overall rating, and task-completion frequency with a max-diff exercise to pinpoint the single most urgent development area, rather than leaving managers to describe it unprompted
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors on the manager's stated employment recommendation and probes for the concrete incidents and evidence behind it, turning a checkbox rating into something the employee can actually act on
  • Pairs the recommendation with a confidence rating and an open long-text feedback question, plus screening questions on tenure and training/support received, so the report captures both the decision and its justification
  • Purpose-built for the probationary-review workflow specifically (training support adequacy, employment-status recommendation) rather than a generic annual performance form

Jotform

Pharmacy Employee Performance Review Form Template

A static, fielding-ready form built for pharmacy-role performance reviews rather than general probationary evaluations, so it would need reworking to fit a new-hire probation workflow. It benefits from Jotform's mature drag-and-drop builder and integrations, but is industry-specific and not adaptive. No mention of automated interview follow-up or quality scoring.

優れている点

  • Established, easy-to-customize form builder with wide integration support
  • Pre-built structure tailored to a specific industry (pharmacy) role review
  • Likely supports file uploads, e-signatures, and standard form logic

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind ratings
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated evaluation reports
  • Built for pharmacy roles specifically, not general probationary-period assessment

Typeform

Employee Performance Evaluation Form Template

A general-purpose, conversational one-question-at-a-time performance evaluation template, fielding-ready but generic rather than probation-specific. Typeform's format is friendly for respondents, but the template is a static survey rather than a system that follows up on individual answers. No indication of voice interviews or automated scoring.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface that's easy for managers to complete
  • Broad general-purpose performance evaluation structure applicable across roles
  • Simple to customize question wording and branching logic

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific incidents behind a rating or recommendation
  • No automated response quality scoring or auto-generated reports
  • Not tailored to probationary-period specifics like training support adequacy or employment-status recommendations

SurveyMonkey

Employee Self-Evaluation Form Template

This is a self-evaluation template where the employee assesses their own performance, which is a different workflow from a manager's probationary assessment of a new hire. It's a fielding-ready static survey on a well-known platform, useful as a reference point but not a direct substitute for a manager-driven probation review.

優れている点

  • Recognizable, trusted survey platform with straightforward deployment
  • Ready-to-use self-assessment question set
  • Standard survey logic and reporting dashboard

物足りない点

  • Designed for employee self-assessment, not manager evaluation of a new hire's probationary performance
  • Static questions only — no adaptive AI interview to probe evidence behind self-ratings
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Employee Probationary Period Performance Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking the time to complete this probationary period evaluation. Your honest, specific feedback helps determi…」・「Rate this employee's performance during the probationary period on each of the following:」・「Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance during the probationary period?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Industry Straw Poll on a Proposed Policy or Issue

A fast, informal read on where members, attendees, or stakeholders currently stand on a specific industry issue, standard, or proposal — before it goes to a formal vote or decision. The AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each stance and what evidence or changes would actually shift it.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Performance Review & Development Check-In

A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, covering goal progress, core competencies, manager support, and development priorities — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the story behind the ratings, not just the numbers, for richer 1:1 prep and calibration.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection

A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, combining competency self-ratings, goal progress, and development priorities with an AI follow-up that draws out the specific evidence behind an employee's accomplishments and challenges. Built for HR teams and managers running annual or quarterly review processes.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey

A structured self-evaluation for performance review cycles, covering goal achievement, competency ratings, challenges, and development priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific evidence behind the employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value. Built for HR and people managers running review or check-in cycles.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Performance Review & Growth Opportunities Survey

Measures how employees experience performance reviews, career conversations, and growth opportunities — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific stretch assignments, mentorship moments, or blockers behind their advancement ratings. Built for HR and people leaders benchmarking review quality and career pathing across teams.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Food Service Employee Performance Evaluation

A manager-completed evaluation of a food service worker's performance over a review period — covering food safety habits, speed under pressure, customer service, teamwork, and attendance. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the lowest-rated area so feedback is concrete enough to coach on, not just a number.

テンプレートを見る