QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

360 Communication Skills Feedback Survey

Gathers manager, peer, and direct-report perspectives on how clearly, openly, and effectively someone communicates day to day. Combines a behavior-frequency rating battery with a best-worst skill-priority exercise and an AI follow-up interview that surfaces a concrete recent example behind the respondent's lowest rating, turning vague impressions into specific, coachable feedback.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全11問・約6分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking part in this communication skills review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest, specific feedback helps a colleague grow — your responses will be shared in a summarized, de-identified form. It takes about 6 minutes. (Template note: insert the reviewee's name wherever you see 'this person' before launching, or use a merge tag if your platform supports it.)

Q02
選択式必須

What is your working relationship to the person you're giving feedback on?

  • I manage this person
  • This person manages me
  • Peer / same level
  • I'm on a different team but collaborate with them
  • Self-assessment
Q03
マトリクス必須

In the last 3 months, how often has this person done each of the following?

6行 × 4列
  • Explains ideas and decisions clearly, without needing repeated clarification
  • Listens actively and lets others finish before responding
  • Gives feedback that is specific and actionable
  • Adjusts their communication style for different audiences
  • Responds to messages and requests in a timely way
  • ほか1件
列: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost Always
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how effective is this person's communication in their current role?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all effective最大:Extremely effective
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which communication skills would be most valuable for this person to develop further?

  • Active listening
  • Clarity and conciseness
  • Public speaking and presentations
  • Written communication (email, docs)
  • Giving constructive feedback
  • Receiving feedback openly
  • Adapting message to different audiences
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most important to develop最も悪い:Least important to develop
Q06
自由回答（長文）必須

Describe one specific, recent example (last 60 days) where this person's communication worked well or fell short. Include roughly what was said or written, and what happened as a result.

Q07
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to walk through the specific example they just described in more detail: what exactly was communicated, how the recipient(s) reacted, and what a stronger version of that message would have looked like. Cross-reference their rating-scale answers — if they marked any behavior as 'Rarely,' probe whether that reflects a one-off incident or a consistent pattern and ask for a distinct recent instance. If the respondent struggles to recall specifics, ask them to describe the last team meeting or written update this person led instead.

Q08
選択式

Would you recommend this person for a role that requires regularly communicating with senior leadership or external clients?

  • Yes, without hesitation
  • Yes, with some coaching first
  • Not yet
  • Unsure / not enough exposure
Q09
選択式

How long have you worked directly with this person?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
選択式

Which best describes your team or function? (Replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)

  • Engineering / Product
  • Sales / Business Development
  • Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • People / HR
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Responses across all reviewers will be combined into a summarized report to support this person's development, without attributing individual comments to you.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Built specifically for 360-degree feedback: a relationship question captures whether the rater is a manager, peer, or direct report, and reporting can be viewed across all three groups rather than as one generic self- or manager-only assessment.
  • Pairs a behavior-frequency matrix (how often specific communication behaviors occur) with a best-worst (max-diff) skill-priority exercise, so results show both current frequency and where development effort should focus.
  • An AI follow-up interview automatically probes the specific recent example behind the respondent's lowest rating, turning a vague low score into a concrete, coachable story instead of leaving it as an unexplained number.
  • Every response is automatically quality-scored and rolled into an auto-generated report, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked and why.

SurveySparrow

Communication Skills Assessment Questionnaire Template

A ready-to-use, fielding-ready template for assessing an individual's communication skills, built on SurveySparrow's conversational-form format. It appears designed around fixed rating-style questions rather than a structured multi-rater (manager/peer/direct-report) 360 design, and there's no indication it distinguishes rater relationship or aggregates across perspectives. Good for a quick, single-pass assessment rather than a layered 360 exercise.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that's easy to customize and brand
  • Ready to deploy immediately without building a survey from scratch
  • Part of a broader survey platform with standard distribution and reporting tools

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific example behind a low rating — responses stay at the rating level
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
  • No visible best-worst/max-diff prioritization exercise or explicit 360 (manager/peer/direct-report) structuring

Typeform

Communication Style Survey Form

A clean, fielding-ready form focused on communication style/preferences, likely aimed at self-assessment or team-building rather than 360-style feedback from managers, peers, and direct reports. It's built on Typeform's well-known conversational UX but reads as a static question set rather than one that adapts to a respondent's specific answers. Useful for a lighter-touch style snapshot, not a coaching-grade feedback exercise.

優れている点

  • Highly polished, mobile-friendly conversational form experience
  • Simple to customize question wording and branching logic for basic paths
  • Fast to set up and share as a standalone survey

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to surface a concrete recent example behind any rating
  • No behavior-frequency matrix or max-diff skill-priority exercise — appears limited to style/preference questions
  • No automated quality scoring, transparent prompt disclosure, or auto-generated coaching report

よくあるご質問

「360 Communication Skills Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking part in this communication skills review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Y…」・「What is your working relationship to the person you're giving feedback on?」・「In the last 3 months, how often has this person done each of the following?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Employee & HR

Employee Health & Accommodation Needs Survey

A voluntary, confidential survey for HR and benefits teams to understand employees' current health-related work accommodation needs and wellness-benefit priorities — not a diagnostic or pre-employment screening tool. The AI follow-up interview explores accommodation gaps and barriers respondents might not fully describe in a closed-ended answer, so support can be tailored rather than generic.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey

Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review

Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Manager Effectiveness & Upward Feedback Survey

Captures how direct reports experience their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and support — with a rating battery, a prioritization exercise on where to improve, and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction score. Built for HR teams and leaders running 360 or upward-feedback cycles.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Upward Manager Feedback: Coaching, Clarity & Support

An upward-feedback survey where direct reports rate their manager on coaching, clarity of direction, fairness, and day-to-day support, plus behavioral questions about 1:1s and feedback frequency. An AI follow-up digs into a specific recent example behind the lowest-rated area so managers get concrete, actionable coaching notes instead of just a score.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Client Contact & Communication Preferences Survey

Measures how satisfied clients are with the frequency, channel, and responsiveness of your team's contact, and what they actually want more or less of. Built for client-facing teams in agencies, consulting, and professional services who want to catch communication breakdowns before they cause churn. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs one specific recent contact experience instead of vague complaints.

テンプレートを見る