すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Facilities Work Order CSAT Survey

Measures employee satisfaction with facilities maintenance requests—from submission clarity to resolution speed—helping workplace operations teams identify service bottlenecks and communication gaps.

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
Facilities Work Order CSAT Survey

Thank you for participating in this survey about your experience with our facilities request process. Your responses will help us identify areas for improvement. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全19問・約10分
メッセージ

Thank you for participating in this survey about your experience with our facilities request process. Your responses will help us identify areas for improvement. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q01
選択式

Have you submitted a facilities or maintenance request in the past 3 months?

  • Yes
  • No
Q02
選択式

How did you submit your most recent facilities request?

  • Helpdesk/Facilities portal
  • Email
  • Chat (Slack/Teams)
  • Phone
  • In person
  • Other (please specify)
Q03
オピニオンスケール

For your most recent request, the steps to submit were clear.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q04
プルダウン

Approximately how long did it take (or has it been) from submission to resolution of your most recent request?

  • Less than 1 day
  • 1–2 days
  • 3–5 days
  • 6–10 days
  • 11–20 days
  • More than 20 days
  • Still open/unresolved
Q05
オピニオンスケール

The initial acknowledgment of my request was timely.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q06
オピニオンスケール

The quality of the completed work met my expectations.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q07
オピニオンスケール

Communication from the facilities team was clear and helpful throughout the process.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q08
オピニオンスケール

The facilities team was professional and courteous.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q09
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with the facilities request process over the past 3 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend our facilities request process to a colleague?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q11
選択式

While a request is in progress, how often would you prefer to receive updates?

  • Only when status changes
  • About once per week
  • Two to three times per week
  • Daily
  • No updates unless there is a delay
Q12
選択式

Which channels work best for receiving status updates on facilities requests? Select up to 3.

  • Email
  • Helpdesk portal notifications
  • Chat (Slack/Teams)
  • SMS/Text
  • Phone call
  • Onsite digital signage
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
ランク付け

Please rank the following potential improvements from most to least important.

  1. Clearer submission guidance
  2. Faster initial acknowledgment
  3. Quicker overall resolution
  4. More proactive status updates
  5. Transparent timelines/SLAs
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q14
自由回答(長文)

What one change would most improve your facilities request experience?

Q15
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about your facilities request experience. Our AI moderator may ask a few brief follow-up questions.

Q16
選択式

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • Onsite
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
プルダウン

Which department best describes your role?

  • Facilities/Workplace
  • Operations
  • Engineering/IT
  • HR/People
  • Finance
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
選択式

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
選択式

Where is your primary work location?

  • Headquarters
  • Regional office
  • Field site
  • Fully remote
  • Prefer not to say
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our facilities services.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Covers the full facilities request lifecycle—submission clarity, acknowledgment timeliness, resolution speed, work quality, and communication—in a single instrument rather than just an intake form.
  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes open-ended dissatisfaction, going beyond a static open-text box.
  • Segments results by work arrangement, department, tenure, and work location, letting operations teams isolate bottlenecks by employee group.
  • Uses a ranking exercise plus a preference question on update cadence/channels, giving facilities teams prioritized, actionable improvement signals rather than just a satisfaction score.

Jotform

Facilities Work Order Request Form Template

This is an intake/request form for submitting a facilities work order, not a post-service satisfaction survey. It's useful for capturing new requests but doesn't measure how employees felt about the process afterward. Best viewed as a complementary form rather than a direct competitor to a CSAT instrument.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for quick facilities request submission
  • Likely supports file/photo attachments and routing common to Jotform's form builder
  • Simple, familiar form format for employees

物足りない点

  • No satisfaction, timeliness, or communication measurement—only intake fields
  • Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up to unpack dissatisfaction
  • No published methodology for scoring or segmenting responses

SurveySparrow

Free Maintenance Work Order Form Template

Positioned as an order form for logging maintenance requests rather than a satisfaction survey. It may capture basic request details but appears focused on operational intake, not resolution experience or communication quality. Useful for request logging, less so for CSAT benchmarking.

優れている点

  • Likely offers a conversational, mobile-friendly form format typical of SurveySparrow
  • Free template lowers barrier to quick deployment
  • Framed for maintenance/order-taking workflows

物足りない点

  • No apparent post-resolution satisfaction or communication questions
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing of open feedback
  • No transparent scoring methodology or auto-generated CSAT reporting evident

Typeform

Maintenance Work Order Form Template

A request-intake form template for maintenance issues, emphasizing Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time UI. It does not appear to include satisfaction, timeliness, or quality-of-resolution measurement, making it an intake tool rather than a CSAT survey competitor.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational form experience typical of Typeform
  • Likely mobile-responsive and easy to embed
  • Simple structure for quick request submission

物足りない点

  • No visible satisfaction, resolution-speed, or communication-quality questions
  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up on open responses
  • No transparent quality scoring or auto-generated operations report

QuestionPro

Client Service Satisfaction Survey Template

A generic client/service satisfaction survey template, not tailored to internal facilities or maintenance work orders. It could be adapted for facilities feedback but lacks facilities-specific stages like submission clarity or acknowledgment timeliness out of the box. More of a general-purpose CSAT starting point than a ready-to-field facilities survey.

優れている点

  • Established CSAT question structure (satisfaction, recommend likelihood) applicable across service contexts
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey analytics platform
  • Flexible enough to be customized for various service types

物足りない点

  • Not facilities-specific—missing submission, acknowledgment, and resolution-speed questions unless manually added
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe low scores in real time
  • No stated transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Facilities Work Order CSAT Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が19問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Have you submitted a facilities or maintenance request in the past 3 months?」・「How did you submit your most recent facilities request?」・「For your most recent request, the steps to submit were clear.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、19問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る