Facilities Work Order CSAT Survey
Measures employee satisfaction with facilities maintenance requests—from submission clarity to resolution speed—helping workplace operations teams identify service bottlenecks and communication gaps.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Have you submitted a facilities or maintenance request in the past 3 months?
- Yes
- No
How did you submit your most recent facilities request?
- Helpdesk/Facilities portal
- Chat (Slack/Teams)
- Phone
- In person
- Other (please specify)
The initial acknowledgment of my request was timely.
Overall, how satisfied are you with the facilities request process over the past 3 months?
While a request is in progress, how often would you prefer to receive updates?
- Only when status changes
- About once per week
- Two to three times per week
- Daily
- No updates unless there is a delay
Please rank the following potential improvements from most to least important.
- Clearer submission guidance
- Faster initial acknowledgment
- Quicker overall resolution
- More proactive status updates
- Transparent timelines/SLAs
What one change would most improve your facilities request experience?
What is your primary work arrangement?
- Onsite
- Hybrid
- Remote
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our facilities services.
For your most recent request, the steps to submit were clear.
The quality of the completed work met my expectations.
How likely are you to recommend our facilities request process to a colleague?
Which channels work best for receiving status updates on facilities requests? Select up to 3.
- Helpdesk portal notifications
- Chat (Slack/Teams)
- SMS/Text
- Phone call
- Onsite digital signage
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about your facilities request experience. Our AI moderator may ask a few brief follow-up questions.
Which department best describes your role?
- Facilities/Workplace
- Operations
- Engineering/IT
- HR/People
- Finance
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how long did it take (or has it been) from submission to resolution of your most recent request?
- Less than 1 day
- 1–2 days
- 3–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–20 days
- More than 20 days
- Still open/unresolved
Communication from the facilities team was clear and helpful throughout the process.
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
The facilities team was professional and courteous.
Where is your primary work location?
- Headquarters
- Regional office
- Field site
- Fully remote
- Prefer not to say
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Covers the full facilities request lifecycle—submission clarity, acknowledgment timeliness, resolution speed, work quality, and communication—in a single instrument rather than just an intake form.
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes open-ended dissatisfaction, going beyond a static open-text box.
- Segments results by work arrangement, department, tenure, and work location, letting operations teams isolate bottlenecks by employee group.
- Uses a ranking exercise plus a preference question on update cadence/channels, giving facilities teams prioritized, actionable improvement signals rather than just a satisfaction score.
Jotform
Facilities Work Order Request Form TemplateThis is an intake/request form for submitting a facilities work order, not a post-service satisfaction survey. It's useful for capturing new requests but doesn't measure how employees felt about the process afterward. Best viewed as a complementary form rather than a direct competitor to a CSAT instrument.
優れている点
- Purpose-built for quick facilities request submission
- Likely supports file/photo attachments and routing common to Jotform's form builder
- Simple, familiar form format for employees
物足りない点
- No satisfaction, timeliness, or communication measurement—only intake fields
- Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up to unpack dissatisfaction
- No published methodology for scoring or segmenting responses
SurveySparrow
Free Maintenance Work Order Form TemplatePositioned as an order form for logging maintenance requests rather than a satisfaction survey. It may capture basic request details but appears focused on operational intake, not resolution experience or communication quality. Useful for request logging, less so for CSAT benchmarking.
優れている点
- Likely offers a conversational, mobile-friendly form format typical of SurveySparrow
- Free template lowers barrier to quick deployment
- Framed for maintenance/order-taking workflows
物足りない点
- No apparent post-resolution satisfaction or communication questions
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing of open feedback
- No transparent scoring methodology or auto-generated CSAT reporting evident
Typeform
Maintenance Work Order Form TemplateA request-intake form template for maintenance issues, emphasizing Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time UI. It does not appear to include satisfaction, timeliness, or quality-of-resolution measurement, making it an intake tool rather than a CSAT survey competitor.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational form experience typical of Typeform
- Likely mobile-responsive and easy to embed
- Simple structure for quick request submission
物足りない点
- No visible satisfaction, resolution-speed, or communication-quality questions
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up on open responses
- No transparent quality scoring or auto-generated operations report
QuestionPro
Client Service Satisfaction Survey TemplateA generic client/service satisfaction survey template, not tailored to internal facilities or maintenance work orders. It could be adapted for facilities feedback but lacks facilities-specific stages like submission clarity or acknowledgment timeliness out of the box. More of a general-purpose CSAT starting point than a ready-to-field facilities survey.
優れている点
- Established CSAT question structure (satisfaction, recommend likelihood) applicable across service contexts
- Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey analytics platform
- Flexible enough to be customized for various service types
物足りない点
- Not facilities-specific—missing submission, acknowledgment, and resolution-speed questions unless manually added
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe low scores in real time
- No stated transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Facilities Work Order CSAT Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thank you for participating in this survey about your experience with our facilities request process. Your responses wil…」・「Have you submitted a facilities or maintenance request in the past 3 months?」・「How did you submit your most recent facilities request?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。