IT SLA Compliance & Incident Handling Stakeholder Survey
Collects structured stakeholder feedback on SLA adherence, incident resolution quality, and improvement priorities over a 90-day window to identify service gaps and guide operational improvements.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which of the following functions do you primarily collaborate with regarding IT services? (Select all that apply)
- IT operations
- Customer support
- Engineering / platform
- Security
- Data / analytics
- Procurement / vendor management
- Other (please specify)
To what extent do you agree: SLA commitments (e.g., response and resolution times) were consistently met for my requests in the past 90 days.
Which channels did you use to report incidents in the past 90 days? (Select all that apply)
- Ticketing system
- Chat (Slack / Teams)
- Phone / hotline
- Walk-up / in-person
- Automated monitoring alert
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how satisfied are you with IT incident handling in the past 90 days?
What is your primary role?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Executive / leader
- Project / program manager
- Product manager
- Engineer / analyst
- Other
Thank you for your time. Your input will directly help us improve IT service reliability and incident response. Results will be reported in aggregate.
In the past 90 days, how often did you interact with the IT service team?
- Daily
- Several times a week
- Weekly
- A few times a month
- Monthly
- Less than monthly
- Not in the past 90 days
To what extent do you agree: I was proactively informed when an SLA was at risk of being breached.
How smoothly were handoffs between teams managed during incident resolution in the past 90 days?
Please rank the following improvement opportunities for incident handling from highest to lowest priority.
- Faster triage and prioritization
- Clearer ownership and roles
- Better communication during incidents
- Stronger on-call coverage
- Higher-quality post-incident reviews
- Improved tooling and automation
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- More than 5 years
Approximately how many distinct IT incidents affected your work in the past 90 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
To what extent do you agree: When SLAs were at risk, appropriate escalation procedures were followed.
To what extent do you agree: Root-cause analyses conducted in the past 90 days led to meaningful prevention of recurring incidents.
If you could change one thing to improve IT service levels, what would it be?
Where are you primarily located?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Remote – multiple regions
- Prefer not to say
In the past 90 days, how often were SLAs breached for your requests or incidents?
Briefly describe a recent incident that was handled well. What worked?
Based on your survey responses, please share any additional thoughts about your experience with IT service levels or incident handling. An AI moderator may ask brief follow-up questions.
Thinking about high-priority incidents you experienced in the past 90 days, what was the typical time to first response?
- Under 15 minutes
- 15–30 minutes
- 30–60 minutes
- 1–4 hours
- More than 4 hours
- Not sure / not applicable
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Focuses specifically on IT SLA compliance and incident handling with a 90-day recall window, not generic service quality
- Includes structured multiple-choice, dropdown, opinion-scale, and ranking questions covering SLA adherence, escalation, root-cause analysis, and improvement priorities
- Uses an AI follow-up interview question that adapts to each respondent's prior answers to surface additional context on their experience
- Captures both quantitative signals (breach frequency, satisfaction, ranked priorities) and qualitative detail (incidents handled well, one change to improve service) plus role/tenure/location segmentation
SurveySparrow
Service Quality Questionnaire TemplateA general-purpose service quality feedback template rather than one built specifically around SLA breach tracking or incident escalation. It's a fielding-ready static questionnaire that can be adapted to an IT context but doesn't natively address SLA thresholds or root-cause analysis.
優れている点
- Ready-to-deploy questionnaire format
- Broadly applicable across service industries
- Simple structure likely easy for respondents to complete quickly
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up probing on individual answers
- No SLA-specific or incident-escalation question logic built in
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
QuestionPro
15 Service Quality Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis page reads as an educational guide with a list of sample service-quality questions and an embedded sample questionnaire, rather than a purpose-built, ready-to-field SLA/incident survey. Useful for question inspiration but requires manual assembly into a working IT-specific instrument.
優れている点
- Provides a broad bank of service-quality question examples
- Explains rationale behind question types, useful for DIY survey building
- Backed by an established survey platform for distribution
物足りない点
- Presented as a guide/sample list rather than a deployable, IT-SLA-specific template
- No adaptive AI interviewing or voice AI option
- No built-in automated quality scoring or incident-handling-specific reporting
SurveyMonkey
Incident Report Form TemplateA generic incident-reporting form aimed at logging incident details rather than gathering stakeholder perception of SLA compliance and improvement priorities over a defined period. It's a static, fielding-ready form well suited to intake logging but not stakeholder sentiment analysis.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready and simple for quick incident intake
- Familiar, trusted survey platform with broad distribution options
- Straightforward structure for capturing basic incident facts
物足りない点
- No SLA-compliance or 90-day trend framing
- Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated improvement report
よくあるご質問
「IT SLA Compliance & Incident Handling Stakeholder Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for participating. This short survey asks about your experiences with IT service levels and incid…」・「Which of the following functions do you primarily collaborate with regarding IT services? (Select all that apply)」・「To what extent do you agree: SLA commitments (e.g., response and resolution times) were consistently met for my requests…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。