すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Longitudinal Study Attrition & Retention Diagnostic

Diagnoses why participants miss or consider skipping follow-up time points in longitudinal research, and identifies actionable levers—reminders, incentives, burden reduction—to improve retention and compliance.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全22問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to this brief survey about your experience participating in this longitudinal study. This survey asks about your participation patterns, any challenges you have encountered, and your preferences for reminders and incentives. Your responses will help us improve the study experience for all participants. • Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. • All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • Estimated completion time: 7–9 minutes. By continuing, you indicate that you have read the above and consent to participate.

Q02
選択式

Thinking about the last 12 months, which best describes your participation in this study?

  • Completed every scheduled time point
  • Missed one time point
  • Missed more than one time point
  • Joined recently (completed only the first time point)
  • I don't recall
Q03
選択式

What were the reasons you missed one or more time points, or seriously considered skipping? Please select all that apply.

  • Scheduling conflict or time constraints
  • Forgot or missed the deadline
  • Survey felt too long
  • Time points were too frequent
  • Incentives felt too low
  • Technical issues (link, device, or login)
  • Instructions were unclear
  • Did not see reminders in time
  • Questions felt too personal or sensitive
  • Health or family issues
  • In-person visit was difficult to attend
  • Lost interest or topic no longer felt relevant
  • Concern about data privacy
  • Other reason
  • Prefer not to say
Q04
ランク付け

Please rank the following factors by how much they motivate you to complete each time point, from most motivating (top) to least motivating (bottom).

  1. Contributing to important research
  2. Receiving the incentive/payment
  3. Getting personalized feedback or results
  4. Feeling a sense of commitment to the study team
  5. The survey process being quick and easy
  6. Receiving timely and helpful reminders
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How burdensome has the length of each survey session been over the last 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all burdensome最大:Extremely burdensome
Q06
選択式

How would you prefer to receive reminders for upcoming time points? Select all that apply.

  • Email
  • SMS / text message
  • Phone call
  • Push notification in an app
  • Calendar invite (Google / Outlook)
  • Messaging app (e.g., WhatsApp)
  • None — I do not want reminders
Q07
AIインタビュー

If you could suggest one change to make it easier to complete every time point, what would it be? Feel free to also share any other thoughts about your experience in this study.

Q08
プルダウン

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to improve the study experience for all participants. Your input is greatly valued.

Q10
プルダウン

Of the reasons you selected, which single factor had the greatest impact on your most recent missed or nearly-missed time point?

  • Scheduling conflict or time constraints
  • Forgot or missed the deadline
  • Survey felt too long
  • Time points were too frequent
  • Incentives felt too low
  • Technical issues (link, device, or login)
  • Instructions were unclear
  • Did not see reminders in time
  • Questions felt too personal or sensitive
  • Health or family issues
  • In-person visit was difficult to attend
  • Lost interest or topic no longer felt relevant
  • Concern about data privacy
  • Other reason
  • Not sure / Don't remember
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How burdensome has the frequency of time points been over the last 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all burdensome最大:Extremely burdensome
Q12
プルダウン

How far in advance of a time point would you like to receive the first reminder?

  • Same day
  • 1 day before
  • 3 days before
  • 1 week before
  • 2 weeks before
Q13
選択式

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
選択式

In the last 12 months, did you ever seriously consider skipping a time point or withdrawing from the study entirely?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How burdensome has scheduling around your other commitments been over the last 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all burdensome最大:Extremely burdensome
Q16
選択式

Which types of incentives would you most value? Select up to 3.

  • Cash transfer
  • Electronic gift card
  • Prepaid debit card
  • Charity donation in my name
  • Entry into a prize drawing
  • Course credit
  • Personalized feedback or report
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • High school or less
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate (Master's / PhD / Professional)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How burdensome have technical aspects of participation (e.g., logging in, loading surveys, device compatibility) been over the last 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all burdensome最大:Extremely burdensome
Q19
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how fair do you feel the study's current incentives are relative to the time and effort required?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q20
プルダウン

Which best describes your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Unpaid caregiver
  • Retired
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Unemployed and not seeking work
  • Unable to work
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール

Compared to the time and effort each time point requires, how adequate is the current incentive amount?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Far too low最大:More than adequate
Q22
プルダウン

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Purpose-built for longitudinal research attrition, not general customer or student churn — includes questions on missed/skipped time points, reasons for non-completion, and single-factor ranking of greatest impact
  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview question asking participants to suggest one change to make completion easier, capturing open-ended nuance a static form would miss
  • Separates burden into four distinct opinion-scale dimensions (session length, frequency, scheduling, technical friction) so researchers can pinpoint the actual lever to pull
  • Covers actionable retention levers directly — reminder channel/timing preferences and incentive-type preferences plus fairness/adequacy ratings — paired with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report

Jotform

Student Retention Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready form focused on why students disengage from or leave an academic program, not why participants skip follow-up time points in a longitudinal study. Useful as a general retention-form starting point via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, but the question set targets institutional enrollment retention rather than research attrition or compliance behavior.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form builder with drag-and-drop editing
  • Part of a large template library, so easy to adapt structurally
  • Simple to embed and share for institutional survey administration

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into reasons for disengagement
  • No mechanism for automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • Built for student/institutional retention, not multi-time-point longitudinal research attrition diagnostics

QuestionPro

18 College Student Survey Questions + Survey Template

A guide-style template page listing college student retention survey questions, oriented toward institutional efforts to keep students enrolled rather than diagnosing time-point-specific attrition in a longitudinal research study. It's more an explanatory question list than a ready-to-field, study-specific attrition instrument.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad question-bank support
  • Provides a curated list of retention-related questions as a starting reference
  • Backed by a company with wider survey logic and reporting features

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interviewing or voice AI follow-up — relies on fixed question text
  • Content framed around general college retention, not longitudinal study compliance or missed time points specifically
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology for any AI-assisted questioning

よくあるご質問

「Longitudinal Study Attrition & Retention Diagnostic」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to this brief survey about your experience participating in this longitudinal study. This survey asks about you…」・「Thinking about the last 12 months, which best describes your participation in this study?」・「What were the reasons you missed one or more time points, or seriously considered skipping? Please select all that apply…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る