Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEducation & Academic
Online Training Course Feedback Survey
Captures how learners actually experienced an online training course — completion, content quality, instructor clarity, and confidence applying the material — for L&D teams and course designers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real obstacles behind low satisfaction or recommendation scores instead of settling for a bare number.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
How much of this training did you complete?
- All of it
- Most of it
- About half
- Less than half
- None of it
Q03
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about the training?
5行 × 5列
- The content was relevant to my role
- The instructor/facilitator explained concepts clearly
- The pace of the training was appropriate
- The exercises and practice activities helped me learn
- The platform was easy to navigate
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q05
評価スケール
How would you rate the quality of the training materials (slides, videos, handouts)?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q06
選択式
Which part of the training did you find most engaging?
- Self-paced videos or readings
- Live instructor-led sessions
- Hands-on exercises or simulations
- Quizzes and knowledge checks
- Discussion boards or peer interaction
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague who needs the same skills?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's satisfaction and recommendation scores: ask what specifically drove that number and what a top score would have required. If they flagged a low agreement item in the earlier ratings (pacing, clarity, relevance, exercises, or platform), dig into a concrete moment where that fell short. Also surface the single biggest obstacle they expect to applying what they learned on the job, and what support would remove it.
Q09
ランク付け
Rank the following aspects of the training from most to least valuable to your learning.
- Course content
- Instructor/facilitator
- Learning materials
- Pacing and structure
- Practical exercises
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q10
選択式必須
What is the single biggest obstacle to applying what you learned in your day-to-day work?
- Lack of time
- Lack of manager support
- Content not directly relevant to my role
- I've already forgotten most of it
- No obstacle — I'm already applying it
Q11
選択式
Which best describes your role or department? (Template note: replace these with your own department list before launching.)
- (Replace with department A)
- (Replace with department B)
- (Replace with department C)
- Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式
How much experience did you have with this topic before the training?
- None
- A little
- Some
- A lot
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes straight to the team that designs this training and will shape the next version.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond a satisfaction number with an AI follow-up interview that probes the actual reasoning behind low satisfaction or recommendation scores, instead of leaving low scores unexplained.
- Combines structured measurement (completion multiple-choice, agreement matrix, materials rating, opinion scales, ranking of valuable aspects) with open-ended obstacle identification, so L&D teams get both the 'what' and the 'why'.
- Includes a ranking question and a dedicated 'biggest obstacle to applying what you learned' question, which directly targets transfer-of-learning gaps that generic satisfaction surveys skip.
- Prompts for the AI interview are transparent and viewable, and results roll into an auto-generated report — no manual theme-coding of open text required.
SurveySparrow
Online Training Feedback Form TemplateA ready-to-field form covering standard training feedback questions (content, delivery, satisfaction). SurveySparrow does offer conversational/chat-style survey formats on its platform generally, but this specific template is a fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up logic. Good for quick fielding, less suited for diagnosing root causes of low scores.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use, fieldable template
- Part of a broader conversational-survey platform
- Education-focused template library for context
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning tied to individual responses
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No published prompt/methodology transparency for how questions are analyzed
Jotform
Online Course Instructor Feedback Form TemplateA static, drag-and-drop-editable form focused specifically on instructor performance rather than full course experience (completion, materials, transfer to job). Useful if instructor evaluation is the sole goal, but narrower in scope than a full training-feedback instrument and offers no dynamic questioning.
優れている点
- Easy visual form builder and customization
- Purpose-built for instructor-specific feedback
- Large template library for related use cases
物足りない点
- Narrower scope (instructor only, not full course/completion/application experience)
- No adaptive AI interview to probe reasons behind ratings
- No automated report generation or per-response scoring
Typeform
Training Feedback Form TemplateA conversational one-question-at-a-time form, which reads more naturally than a grid form but is still a fixed sequence of pre-written questions. It does not adapt follow-up questions based on what a respondent actually types, so nuanced dissatisfaction reasons are left to open text fields.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational one-at-a-time question flow
- Strong design/branding customization
- Mobile-friendly respondent experience
物足りない点
- No AI-driven adaptive follow-up on individual answers
- No voice-based interview option
- No automated quality scoring of responses or auto-generated analytical report
SurveyMonkey
Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback GuideThis page functions as much as a guide to writing training-evaluation questions as a ready-to-field template, with explanatory content around the question list. It gives a solid static question bank for course evaluation but no mechanism to dig deeper into individual low scores.
優れている点
- Educational context and question-writing guidance alongside the template
- Backed by a well-established survey platform with broad reporting features
- Question bank covers common evaluation angles
物足りない点
- Presented partly as a guide rather than a purely fielding-ready instrument
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Online Training Course Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking this training! We'd love your honest feedback so we can improve it for the next group. Your responses…」・「How much of this training did you complete?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about the training?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。