Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEducation & Academic
Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey
Captures how a training session landed — content quality, trainer effectiveness, and confidence applying new skills — for L&D teams and instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind the recommendation score: what specifically helped or blocked people from using what they learned.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
Which training session are you giving feedback on? (Template note: replace with your actual session list before launching.)
- (Replace with Session A name)
- (Replace with Session B name)
- (Replace with Session C name)
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how satisfied were you with this training session?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q04
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about the session?
5行 × 5列
- The content was relevant to my role
- The trainer explained concepts clearly
- The pace was appropriate (not too fast or slow)
- The materials/handouts were useful for later reference
- There was enough hands-on practice or examples
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague with a similar role?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q06
選択式必須
In the next 30 days, how confident are you that you'll actually apply what you learned in this session?
- Not at all confident
- Somewhat confident
- Confident
- Very confident
Q07
AIインタビュー
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score: ask for one specific moment in the session that either clicked for them or fell flat, and anchor on a concrete example of how they expect to (or already did) use the material on the job. If they gave a low confidence rating for applying the skills, dig into the specific obstacle — time, manager support, unclear instructions, or something else — and what would remove it.
Q08
自由回答（長文）
What's the single biggest obstacle that could stop you from using what you learned once you're back on the job?
Q09
ランク付け
Rank these parts of the session from most to least valuable to you.
- Core content/curriculum
- Trainer's expertise and delivery
- Hands-on exercises or practice
- Handouts and reference materials
- Discussion and networking with peers
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q10
選択式
For future sessions like this one, which format would work best for you?
- In-person
- Live virtual
- Hybrid (in-person + virtual)
- Self-paced/recorded
Q11
選択式
Which department or team are you part of? (Optional — helps us spot patterns across groups.)
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2 to 5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for the thoughtful feedback! We'll use your answers, alongside everyone else's, to fine-tune content, pacing, and format for the next round of training.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond satisfaction scores with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasoning behind a respondent's recommendation score, surfacing what actually helped or blocked skill application.
- Combines structured measurement (opinion scales, an agreement matrix, ranking of session components) with an open-ended obstacle question and adaptive probing, so L&D teams get both trend data and real narrative context.
- Captures forward-looking signal — 30-day confidence to apply new skills and preferred formats for future sessions — not just a backward-looking satisfaction snapshot.
- Includes optional demographic segmentation (department, tenure) so teams can spot patterns across groups, all rolled into an auto-generated report without manual analysis.
Jotform
Participant training session feedback Form TemplateA drag-and-drop, fielding-ready form template covering standard post-training satisfaction questions. Built on Jotform's broader form ecosystem (PDF export, integrations), but the questions themselves are fixed once deployed. Good for quick deployment, not for probing why a score was given.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use template within a mature form-builder platform
- Likely supports easy customization of fields and branding
- Integrates with Jotform's wider suite (PDF/report exports, integrations)
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore the 'why' behind ratings
- No AI-driven interview or voice-based follow-up capability
- No transparent prompt/methodology disclosure since it isn't an AI-driven tool
SurveySparrow
Online Training Feedback Form TemplateA conversational-style, fielding-ready template that presents questions one at a time for a chat-like feel. It covers typical training feedback dimensions but relies on fixed branching logic rather than true adaptive probing. Useful for a friendlier UX, not for uncovering unscripted detail.
優れている点
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that can improve completion rates
- Ready-made template for quick deployment
- Likely supports basic skip logic for personalization
物足りない点
- No AI-generated follow-up questions tailored to each respondent's specific answer
- No voice-based interview option
- No per-response quality scoring or automated depth analysis
Typeform
Session Feedback Form TemplateA polished, fielding-ready conversational form template well-suited to general session feedback. Typeform's design strength is presentation and flow, but the question set is predetermined at build time. It does not adapt to what a respondent actually says.
優れている点
- Clean, well-designed conversational interface known for high engagement
- Ready-to-field template requiring minimal setup
- Good branching/logic tools for a static survey
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into the reasoning behind scores
- No voice AI interview option
- No transparent, inspectable AI prompts since there's no AI interviewing layer
QuestionPro
Seminar feedback & attendee information survey questions + Sample questionnaire templateThis page reads more as a sample questionnaire and question-bank guide than a ready-to-field template — it lists example questions for seminar/attendee feedback rather than a deployable survey flow. Useful for question inspiration, but teams would need to build the actual survey elsewhere.
優れている点
- Broad bank of sample questions covering seminar logistics and attendee info
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform for eventual deployment
- Useful as a question-writing reference for L&D teams
物足りない点
- Not a directly fielding-ready template — appears to be a guide/sample question list
- No adaptive or AI-driven follow-up questioning
- No automated report generation or quality scoring built into the sample content itself
よくあるご質問
「Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the training session you just attended! Your honest feedback shapes how we…」・「Which training session are you giving feedback on? (Template note: replace with your actual session list before launchin…」・「Overall, how satisfied were you with this training session?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。