QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the training you recently completed! Your honest feedback shapes how we run future sessions. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which training program did you recently complete? (Replace with your actual program name or list — Template note: customize with your course catalog before launching.)

  • (Program A)
  • (Program B)
  • (Program C)
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied were you with this training?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q04
マトリクス必須

Please rate the following aspects of the training you completed.

5行 × 5列
  • Relevance of the content to your role
  • Instructor's knowledge and delivery
  • Pacing (too fast, too slow, or right)
  • Quality of materials and resources provided
  • Amount of hands-on practice or exercises
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you in applying what you learned to your actual work?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

When you think about what makes training genuinely useful, which of these matter most to you and which matter least?

  • Depth of subject matter content
  • Instructor's real-world expertise
  • Hands-on practice and exercises
  • Pacing and time management
  • Quality of take-home materials
  • Flexibility of schedule or format
  • Opportunities to ask questions
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q08
選択式

For future training, which format would you prefer?

  • In-person, instructor-led
  • Live virtual session
  • Self-paced online
  • Blended (mix of formats)
Q09
AIインタビュー

Explore whether the respondent has actually used the skills from this training on the job since completing it — ask for a specific example if possible. If their confidence rating was low, probe what specifically is blocking them (unclear content, lack of manager support, no opportunity to practice, etc.). If confidence was high, ask what made the transfer to real work easy, and what would make the next training session even more useful.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

Any other feedback on how we could improve this training program?

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role or department?

  • (Department A)
  • (Department B)
  • (Department C)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your feedback! Your responses will be combined with others to improve upcoming training sessions and course design.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a matrix rating of specific training aspects (content quality, instructor, applicability) plus a dedicated confidence-in-application scale, going beyond a single satisfaction score
  • Uses a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off to identify what respondents actually value most in future training, giving prioritized data rather than flat ratings
  • Pairs the survey with an AI follow-up interview that probes whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not — something static forms can't do
  • Auto-generates a report combining scaled responses, the trade-off ranking, and interview findings for L&D teams, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked

Jotform

Training Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form for gathering post-training satisfaction feedback, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers standard satisfaction and feedback fields but is a static form rather than an adaptive interview. Good for quick deployment, not for deeper qualitative follow-up.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's form builder
  • Fast to deploy for basic post-training feedback collection
  • Supports typical form logic and integrations common to Jotform templates

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe on-the-job skill application
  • Static question set with no mechanism to explore why skills weren't used
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated reporting

QuestionPro

Sales Training Meeting Satisfaction Survey Template

A static survey template focused specifically on sales training meetings rather than general L&D program evaluation. It's fielding-ready within QuestionPro's platform but narrower in scope than a general training effectiveness survey. Useful if the audience is exclusively sales teams, less so for cross-department training evaluation.

優れている点

  • Tailored wording for sales-specific training contexts
  • Built on QuestionPro's established survey platform and reporting tools
  • Ready to field with minimal setup

物足りない点

  • Narrow focus on sales training rather than general program effectiveness
  • No adaptive AI interviewing to explore actual post-training skill usage
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative analysis

Typeform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time form for evaluating training effectiveness, benefiting from Typeform's polished UI and completion-friendly design. It's a static question set, however, with no branching AI interview to dig into whether learning transferred to the job. Best suited for quick-turnaround feedback rather than deeper diagnostic insight.

優れている点

  • Clean, engaging conversational interface that can improve completion rates
  • Simple to customize within Typeform's ecosystem
  • Mobile-friendly presentation of questions

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option to probe real-world application
  • Cannot dynamically explore barriers to using trained skills
  • No automated quality scoring or AI-generated synthesis report

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This page reads more like a guide to training evaluation questions than a single fielding-ready template, offering advice and sample questions to build a survey. It's useful for inspiration but requires assembly work before deployment. It does not include any interview-style follow-up mechanism.

優れている点

  • Educational content explaining what to ask and why in course evaluations
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's broad survey platform and distribution tools
  • Sample questions cover common evaluation dimensions

物足りない点

  • Presented as a guide/blog rather than a ready-to-field template
  • No adaptive AI interview to assess actual post-training behavior change
  • No transparent prompt design or automated per-response scoring

よくあるご質問

「Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the training you recently completed! Your honest feedback shapes how we ru…」・「Which training program did you recently complete? (Replace with your actual program name or list — Template note: custom…」・「Overall, how satisfied were you with this training?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

High School Dropout Reasons And Reengagement Survey

Understands why students leave high school before earning a diploma and what conditions might bring them back, for school districts, counselors, and youth-reengagement programs. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific turning point behind the decision to leave, going deeper than a single checkbox reason.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates whether a train-the-trainer program actually builds facilitation skill and gets used back on the job — covering content relevance, confidence delivering sessions, and skill transfer. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real training session the respondent led afterward, not just their impression of the course.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey

Captures how a training session landed — content quality, trainer effectiveness, and confidence applying new skills — for L&D teams and instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind the recommendation score: what specifically helped or blocked people from using what they learned.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Post-Training Course Effectiveness Evaluation

Measures training course quality across content relevance, instructor delivery, engagement, and materials. Designed for L&D teams seeking actionable feedback to improve future training programs.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

テンプレートを見る