すべてのテンプレート
Sustainability & Impact

Outage Notification & ETA Accuracy Satisfaction Survey

Measures residential utility customer satisfaction with outage notifications, estimated restoration time accuracy, and communication channel preferences. Designed for utility providers seeking to identify communication gaps and prioritize improvements.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全21問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome, and thank you for your interest in this survey. We are conducting research about experiences with power outage notifications and estimated restoration times over the past 12 months. Please answer based on your primary energy provider. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.

Q02
選択式

In the past 12 months, did you experience any power outages at your residence?

  • Yes, at least one
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
プルダウン

Approximately how many separate power outages did you experience in the past 12 months?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3–4
  • 5–7
  • 8–10
  • More than 10
Q04
選択式

Which of the following channels did you receive outage notifications from? Please select all that apply.

  • SMS/text message
  • Email
  • Mobile app push notification
  • Automated phone call/IVR
  • Utility website/status page
  • Social media
  • In-person door tag or letter
  • I did not receive any notifications
Q05
オピニオンスケール

Thinking about the most recent outage notification you received, how would you rate its timeliness?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely untimely最大:Extremely timely
Q06
選択式

Compared with the estimated time of restoration (ETR) you received, the actual restoration was…

  • Much earlier than stated
  • Slightly earlier than stated
  • About what was stated
  • Slightly later than stated
  • Much later than stated
  • I did not receive an ETR
Q07
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with how your utility provider communicates during outages?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q08
プルダウン

For planned outages, how much advance notice would you prefer from your utility provider?

  • Same day (less than 4 hours)
  • Same day (4–12 hours)
  • Day before (12–24 hours)
  • 2–3 days before
  • 4–7 days before
  • More than a week before
  • I don't need advance notice
Q09
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience with outage notifications and estimated restoration times.

Q10
選択式

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to help improve outage communication practices.

Q12
選択式

Which single channel would you most prefer for receiving outage updates?

  • SMS/text message
  • Email
  • Mobile app push notification
  • Automated phone call/IVR
  • Utility website/status page
  • Social media
  • Other (please specify)
  • No preference
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the clarity of that notification?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q14
選択式

During your most recent outage, how frequently were the estimated restoration times updated?

  • No updates after the first estimate
  • Updated once during the outage
  • Updated every few hours
  • Updated hourly or more frequently
  • I did not receive an estimate
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you that future estimated restoration times from your provider will be accurate?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q16
ランク付け

Please rank the following by importance for improving outage communications, where 1 = most important.

  1. More accurate estimated restoration times
  2. More frequent updates during outages
  3. Clearer cause-of-outage and crew status information
  4. Earlier proactive notifications before outages
  5. Reliable delivery on my preferred channel
  6. Interactive outage map with live status
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q17
選択式

What is your gender?

  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the usefulness of the information provided in that notification?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all useful最大:Extremely useful
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend your utility provider to a friend or neighbor based on their outage communication?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q20
プルダウン

Which country or region do you live in?

  • United States
  • Canada
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • Other (please specify)
Q21
選択式

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Rural
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Purpose-built for utility outage communication, covering notification receipt, channel preferences, ETR accuracy, and clarity/usefulness ratings rather than generic satisfaction questions
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that lets customers elaborate on their outage experience in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
  • Combines opinion-scale, ranking, and dropdown question types to capture both quantitative satisfaction scores and prioritized improvement areas (e.g., ranking communication improvements, advance notice preferences)
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean utility teams get structured, ready-to-use findings without manual analysis

Jotform

200+ Customer Satisfaction Evaluation Forms

This is a broad category page listing many generic customer satisfaction form templates rather than a single fielding-ready survey, and none are specific to utility outage communication. Useful as a form-building starting point but requires significant customization for outage/ETR-specific research.

優れている点

  • Large library of customizable form templates across many use cases
  • Drag-and-drop form builder likely included for quick edits

物足りない点

  • No utility-outage or ETR-specific questions; would need to be built from scratch
  • Static form fields only, no adaptive AI follow-up probing into open-ended feedback
  • No transparent, publishable methodology or prompt logic for how responses are interpreted

QuestionPro

Customer satisfaction survey questions | Customer satisfaction survey example

A generic customer satisfaction survey template with example questions, not tailored to outage notifications, ETR accuracy, or utility communication channels. It offers a solid general CSAT starting point but lacks domain-specific structure.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with reporting and analytics tools
  • Provides example questions to help users draft their own satisfaction survey

物足りない点

  • No outage-specific or ETR accuracy questions built in
  • Fixed-format questions only; no adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up
  • No disclosed per-response scoring methodology

SurveyMonkey

Customer Satisfaction Survey Template

A ready-to-use general CSAT template from a well-known survey platform, but it is generic and not designed for utility outage notification or restoration-time accuracy research. Teams would need to substantially rewrite questions for this use case.

優れている点

  • Quick deployment via a widely used, reputable survey platform
  • Standard CSAT question set and basic analytics dashboard

物足りない点

  • No coverage of outage notification channels, ETR accuracy, or advance-notice preferences
  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on individual responses
  • No transparent prompt/methodology documentation for how open responses are analyzed

SurveySparrow

FREE Customer Satisfaction Survey Template

A free, generic customer satisfaction template aimed at general business use, not utility-specific outage or ETR research. It provides a conversational survey format but omits the domain-specific structure this topic requires.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format may improve completion rates
  • Free template offering lowers barrier to entry

物足りない点

  • No outage notification, ETR accuracy, or channel-preference questions included
  • No adaptive AI or voice-based interview capability for deeper follow-up
  • No published scoring rubric or prompt transparency for response evaluation

よくあるご質問

「Outage Notification & ETA Accuracy Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for your interest in this survey. We are conducting research about experiences with power outage…」・「In the past 12 months, did you experience any power outages at your residence?」・「Approximately how many separate power outages did you experience in the past 12 months?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る