すべてのテンプレート
Privacy & Compliance

Passkeys Readiness & Risk Assessment

An internal stakeholder survey to assess organizational readiness for passkeys/passwordless authentication, surface security and UX risks, and align cross-functional teams on rollout priorities.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全24問・約11分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey helps us assess our organization's readiness for passkeys/passwordless authentication and surface any risks to address before rollout. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest perspective. Responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate to inform our rollout planning. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes. Thank you for your input.

Q02
選択式

Which of the following describe your involvement with authentication today? Select all that apply.

  • I make authentication strategy decisions
  • I implement authentication systems
  • I provide security governance/risk oversight
  • I support end users (help desk/training)
  • I own a product or service affected by auth UX
  • Other (please specify)
Q03
選択式

Which sign-in methods are currently in active use at our organization? Select all that apply.

  • Passwords + MFA (e.g., OTP/app push)
  • Passwords without MFA
  • Single sign-on (SSO)
  • Hardware security keys
  • Biometric login on managed devices
  • Magic links or one-time codes
  • Social login (e.g., Google/Apple)
  • Not sure
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
ランク付け

Rank the outcomes we should prioritize with a passkeys rollout. Drag to order; top = highest priority.

  1. Reduce phishing risk
  2. Lower password reset volume
  3. Improve login UX and speed
  4. Strengthen overall security posture
  5. Reduce credential stuffing and fraud
  6. Improve compliance posture
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q05
選択式

Which concerns should we address before a wider passkeys rollout? Select all that apply.

  • Account recovery and lost devices
  • Shared or kiosk device scenarios
  • Legacy browser/app support
  • Help desk workload during transition
  • Total cost and licensing
  • Compatibility with SSO/IdP
  • Vendor lock-in or portability
  • Regulatory/assurance requirements
  • User resistance or change fatigue
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
選択式

Who would be the best candidates for an initial passkeys pilot? Select all that apply.

  • Security/IT staff
  • Engineering teams
  • Early adopters/volunteers
  • New hires
  • Contractors/partners
  • Customer support
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional comments, concerns, or context we should consider for a passkeys rollout.

Q08
プルダウン

Which department or function do you primarily represent?

  • Security/GRC
  • IT/Infrastructure
  • Engineering/Development
  • Product Management
  • Design/UX
  • Customer Support
  • Finance/Procurement
  • HR/People
  • Other
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time—your input will directly inform our passkeys rollout planning and risk mitigation strategy. If you have any questions, please reach out to [contact].

Q10
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with passkeys/passwordless authentication concepts?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q11
選択式

In your view, which technical dependencies are most important to address for a passkeys rollout? Select up to 3.

  • Compatibility with our IdP/SSO
  • Mobile device management (MDM) integration
  • Platform coverage (iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, ChromeOS)
  • Browser support
  • FIDO2/security key support
  • SDKs for native and mobile apps
  • Compliance/audit logging requirements
  • Disaster recovery and fallback access
  • Not sure / not applicable to my role
Q12
プルダウン

What timeline feels realistic for piloting or expanding passkeys at our organization?

  • Already in use
  • Evaluating now
  • 0–3 months
  • 3–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • Over 12 months
  • No plans
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How likely is it that account recovery and lost-device scenarios will cause significant issues during rollout?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q14
選択式

Which metrics would you use to judge the success of a passkeys rollout? Select up to 3.

  • Password reset tickets down
  • Fewer MFA prompts
  • Authentication success rate
  • Median login time
  • Fewer phishing/security incidents
  • User satisfaction (CSAT)
  • Support cost per user
  • Passkeys adoption rate
Q15
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your perspective on passkeys adoption in more depth. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q16
プルダウン

What is your seniority level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead/Manager
  • Director
  • VP or above
Q17
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how ready is our organization to move forward with passkeys?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all ready最大:Fully ready
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How likely is it that legacy app/browser compatibility will cause significant issues during rollout?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q19
自由回答(長文)

What do you see as the biggest blockers to adopting passkeys at our organization?

Q20
プルダウン

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How likely is it that user resistance or change fatigue will cause significant issues during rollout?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q22
プルダウン

Where are you primarily based?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
オピニオンスケール

How likely is it that help desk overload will cause significant issues during rollout?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q24
ランク付け

Rank the following areas by where we should invest most to mitigate passkeys rollout risks. Drag to order; top = highest investment priority.

  1. User training and communications
  2. Support tooling and staffing
  3. Account recovery and backup flows
  4. Legacy app/browser compatibility
  5. Compliance and audit readiness
  6. Vendor evaluation and exit plans
  7. Monitoring and analytics
ドラッグして順位を付ける

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes dedicated risk-likelihood questions on specific passkeys failure modes—account recovery/lost devices, legacy app compatibility, user resistance, and help desk overload—rather than generic security risk items
  • Uses ranking questions to force explicit prioritization of both rollout outcomes and where to invest mitigation effort, surfacing cross-functional disagreement
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended perspectives on adoption blockers beyond what closed-ended questions capture
  • Segments respondents by department, seniority, tenure, and location so results can be cross-tabbed to see where readiness and concerns diverge across the organization

SurveySparrow

Information Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire

This is a general information security risk assessment template, not one built around passkeys or passwordless authentication specifically. It's a fielding-ready questionnaire covering broad security risk themes, so teams would need to substantially rewrite or extend it to address passkeys-specific rollout concerns like legacy compatibility or pilot candidate selection.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use structured questionnaire format for security risk topics
  • Backed by SurveySparrow's survey platform with standard question types and distribution
  • Broad security risk framing that could serve as a starting point for adjacent assessments

物足りない点

  • No passkeys- or passwordless-specific content (dependencies, pilot readiness, rollout metrics)
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe stated concerns in more depth
  • No published methodology for how risk questions were scored or weighted

よくあるご質問

「Passkeys Readiness & Risk Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が24問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey helps us assess our organization's readiness for passkeys/passwordless authentication and surface a…」・「Which of the following describe your involvement with authentication today? Select all that apply.」・「Which sign-in methods are currently in active use at our organization? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、24問を約11分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る