Patient Experience & Satisfaction Survey (NPS + CSAT)
Measures patient satisfaction across appointment scheduling, provider interaction quality, and health technology reliability using NPS and CSAT frameworks. Designed for clinics and health systems seeking actionable improvement data.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
When was your most recent visit with this clinic or provider?
- Within the last 7 days
- 1–4 weeks ago
- 1–3 months ago
- More than 3 months ago
- Not sure
How did you schedule or request this visit? Select all that apply.
- Phone call
- Online patient portal
- Clinic website
- Walk-in
- Referral from another provider
- Mobile app
- Other
The following questions ask about the clinician you saw during this visit. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement.
Which of the following technologies, if any, were part of this visit? Select all that apply.
- None
- Telehealth video
- Patient portal/app (forms, messages)
- Remote monitoring device
- Kiosk or check-in tablet
- Automated phone/SMS reminders
- Other
How likely are you to recommend this clinic or provider to a friend or family member?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve the quality of care and access at this clinic. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact [clinic contact information].
What type of visit was it?
- In-person visit
- Video/telehealth
- Phone consult
- Messaging/portal only
How easy was it to schedule your appointment?
My clinician listened carefully to my concerns.
Overall, how reliable was the technology you used during this visit?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with access, provider interaction, or technology during this visit?
Which gender do you identify with?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes the service you received?
- Primary care
- Specialist
- Urgent care
- Diagnostic/imaging
- Therapy/behavioral health
- Other
Approximately how long did you wait past your scheduled appointment time?
- No wait or not applicable
- 1–10 minutes
- 11–20 minutes
- 21–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- More than 60 minutes
My clinician explained my condition and treatment options clearly.
If you experienced any technical issues during this visit, please briefly describe what happened.
We'd like to learn a bit more about your visit experience. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your responses.
Approximately how many healthcare visits have you had in the past 12 months?
- 0 (this was my first)
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
- Prefer not to say
If scheduling was difficult, what specifically made it hard?
My clinician treated me with courtesy and respect.
My clinician spent enough time with me during the visit.
Overall, how would you rate the quality of care you received during this visit?
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines quantitative NPS/CSAT scoring with an AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper on scheduling difficulties, clinician interaction quality, or technology issues in the respondent's own words.
- Covers the full patient journey in one instrument — scheduling ease and wait time, clinician listening/clarity/courtesy/time spent, technology reliability, and overall NPS — rather than a single satisfaction snapshot.
- Open-text questions on scheduling friction and technical issues let patients explain root causes, which the adaptive AI interview can then follow up on for specifics.
- Transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring mean clinics get clean, analyzable data plus an auto-generated report without manual coding of open-ended responses.
QuestionPro
Health Insurance Satisfaction Survey TemplateA fielding-ready static template focused on health insurance/patient satisfaction rather than the full clinic visit journey. Good for quick deployment with standard question logic, but narrower in scope than a combined NPS+CSAT clinic experience survey. No mention of adaptive interviewing or voice-based data collection.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use template within an established survey platform
- Focused specifically on insurance/patient satisfaction context
- Likely supports standard skip logic and reporting dashboards
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Free Patient Satisfaction Survey Template | For Healthcare IndustryA free, fielding-ready patient satisfaction template built on SurveySparrow's conversational survey format, which gives it a friendlier feel than a plain form. It still relies on fixed question flows rather than true AI-driven adaptive questioning, and covers general healthcare satisfaction rather than a structured NPS+CSAT breakdown across scheduling, provider, and technology.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style survey UI that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
- Free to use, lowering the barrier for smaller clinics
- Purpose-built for the healthcare industry
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview capability — question flow is fixed/branching, not dynamically generated per response
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure
SurveyMonkey
Patient Satisfaction Survey TemplateA well-established, fielding-ready post-visit patient satisfaction template from a major survey platform, likely offering solid analytics and benchmarking. It is a static questionnaire format, and there's no indication it includes adaptive follow-up questioning, voice-based interviews, or automated qualitative analysis of open-ended responses.
優れている点
- Backed by a widely used, mature survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking tools
- Specifically designed for post-visit patient feedback
- Likely offers customizable branding and distribution options
物足りない点
- Static form structure with no adaptive AI probing on individual answers
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology for follow-up questions
よくあるご質問
「Patient Experience & Satisfaction Survey (NPS + CSAT)」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が24問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for considering this survey. This brief questionnaire takes approximately 11 minutes and asks abo…」・「When was your most recent visit with this clinic or provider?」・「How did you schedule or request this visit? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、24問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。