Post-Event Satisfaction & NPS Feedback Survey
Measures attendee satisfaction, session quality, logistics, and networking outcomes with NPS benchmarking. Designed for event organizers seeking actionable data to improve future events.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Did you attend any portion of this event (in person or virtually)?
- Yes, in person
- Yes, virtually
- No, I did not attend
Overall, how satisfied were you with this event?
Which session formats were most valuable to you? Select all that apply.
- Keynotes
- Panels
- Workshops
- Roundtables
- Hands-on demos
- Poster/exhibit hall
- Networking sessions/mixers
- Other (please specify)
How would you rate the venue (location, facilities, accessibility)?
How successful were you in achieving your networking goals at this event?
We'd love to hear more about your experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on what stood out most to you — positive or negative.
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time! Your feedback will directly inform how we plan and improve future events. We appreciate your participation.
How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or colleague?
How relevant was the session content to your professional needs?
How would you rate the registration and check-in process?
Approximately how many new useful contacts did you make at this event?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- More than 20
Based on your responses throughout this survey, is there anything else you'd like to share about your experience?
How do you describe your gender? Select all that apply.
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Please rank the following aspects of the event by how valuable they were to you (drag to reorder; top = most valuable).
- Session content
- Speaker quality
- Networking opportunities
- Exhibitors/sponsors
- Venue and location
- Event logistics
How would you rate the overall quality of the speakers and presenters?
How would you rate the event communication (schedules, signage, updates)?
Where do you primarily live or work?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- Oceania
- South America
- Middle East
- Prefer not to say
What is one thing we could improve for the next event?
How would you rate the pacing and time allocated for the sessions?
Which best describes your current role or seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- Manager/Team lead
- Director/Senior manager
- VP/C-suite/Executive
- Founder/Owner
- Student
- Other
- Prefer not to say
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines standard NPS and satisfaction scales with an open-ended AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes attendees' answers instead of stopping at a static question list
- Includes a ranking question for event aspects plus granular ratings across speakers, pacing, venue, registration, and communication for actionable, segment-ready data
- Captures networking outcomes specifically (goals achieved, new contacts made) alongside session-format preferences, giving organizers a fuller picture than generic satisfaction surveys
- Ends with a reflective open-text question tied to the respondent's own prior answers, plus demographic dropdowns for cross-tabbing results by role, age, and location
Jotform
Event Satisfaction Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form builder template for gathering post-event satisfaction feedback. It's a static question set that organizers can edit via drag-and-drop, aimed at quick deployment rather than deep qualitative analysis. Good for basic satisfaction tracking but lacks structured NPS benchmarking or ranking-based prioritization.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's form builder
- Quick to deploy for basic post-event feedback collection
- Part of a broad template library so organizers can adapt related forms
物足りない点
- Static question format with no adaptive follow-up or AI-driven probing of open responses
- No mention of voice AI interviews or automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent methodology or prompt-level documentation of how questions were designed
SurveyMonkey
Event Feedback Form TemplateA standard fielding-ready template for collecting event feedback through SurveyMonkey's established survey platform. It likely includes common satisfaction and logistics questions but relies on fixed-choice and scale items rather than conversational follow-up. Reporting is template-driven analytics rather than AI-generated narrative reports.
優れている点
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey distribution and analytics infrastructure
- Pre-built template reduces setup time for common event feedback needs
- Likely supports standard benchmarking against SurveyMonkey's aggregate data
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI capability to dig deeper into open-ended answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring of qualitative feedback
- Relies on static question flow rather than guided tasks or screen-share-based feedback
SurveySparrow
Participant Feedback Form TemplateA conversational-style form template for collecting participant feedback, consistent with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It offers a friendlier respondent experience than plain forms but still follows a fixed question sequence rather than true adaptive interviewing. Best suited for straightforward feedback collection rather than deep qualitative follow-up.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can improve completion rates
- Pre-built template tailored to event participant feedback
- Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product
物足りない点
- Chat-style UI is not the same as AI-driven adaptive follow-up questioning
- No voice AI interview option or automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent, published methodology for how follow-up or analysis is generated
よくあるご質問
「Post-Event Satisfaction & NPS Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for attending! We'd love to hear about your experience. This survey takes about 10 minutes. Your…」・「Did you attend any portion of this event (in person or virtually)?」・「Overall, how satisfied were you with this event?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。