Photo Diary Study: Product Use in Context
A repeatable diary entry participants complete each time they use your product in real life: a photo of the moment, what they were trying to do, and what got in the way — with an AI probe on the day's friction. Run it daily or weekly to see usage where it actually happens, not in a lab.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
When did this usage session happen?
- In the last hour
- Earlier today
- Yesterday
- Longer ago
Share a photo of the moment — your setup, surroundings, or what you were working with. No faces or private info needed.
In one sentence: what were you trying to get done?
How smoothly did it go?
In your own words (30–60 seconds): walk me through what happened, like you're telling a colleague.
Probe today's diary entry: the exact moment friction appeared and what the participant did next, anything they used alongside the product (other apps, paper, asking someone), and whether this session was typical or unusual for them. Keep it short — two or three focused follow-ups; this is a recurring diary, not a full interview.
Entry logged — thank you! See you at the next check-in. Patterns across your entries (and everyone else's) build the real picture of how the product lives in the world.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Each entry pairs a photo of the real moment with a short AI probe on that day's friction — in-context evidence, not lab recall
- Voice-memo option captures the story the way participants would tell a colleague
- Entries are deliberately 3 minutes so longitudinal participation survives busy weeks
- Cross-entry patterns are assembled automatically into a usage-in-the-wild report
dscout
Diary Studies for Longitudinal UX ResearchA purpose-built longitudinal diary platform that captures photo, video, screen-recording, and text entries over days to years, with automated pacing reminders and playlist/highlight-reel analysis. Very strong on in-context multi-media capture and participant management, and the closest direct competitor to a guided-task style study.
優れている点
- Rich in-context capture: photo submissions, video, screen recordings, and text reflections from participants in the moment
- Multi-part study structures with automated pacing reminders to sustain engagement over long periods
- Analysis tooling: playlist builder with exportable highlight reels, collaborative commenting, and expressiveness ratings
- Precise participant targeting/recruitment for longitudinal panels
物足りない点
- Entry prompts are fixed forms; no AI that reads a submission and asks an adaptive follow-up on that specific entry
- No live voice-AI interview to debrief a participant conversationally about a logged moment
- Synthesis relies on manual tagging and highlight-reel building rather than an auto-written report
- Prompt/question logic is not exposed transparently to the researcher
User Interviews
Diary Studies (UX Research Field Guide)A methodology chapter/template that covers the full diary-study lifecycle (planning, recruitment/onboarding, monitoring, debriefing, analysis) and defines interval-, signal-, and event-contingent logging protocols with sample prompts. Strong on rigor and entry-format variety, but it is guidance plus static forms rather than an adaptive interviewing engine.
優れている点
- Full five-phase lifecycle: planning, recruitment/onboarding, monitoring, debriefing, analysis
- Defines three logging protocols (interval-, signal-, and event-contingent) so studies match the behavior being observed
- Supports written, photo, and audio/video entry formats plus structured forms
- Sample prompts and a bias-avoidance emphasis (clear instructions without steering responses)
物足りない点
- It is a field guide plus static entry forms, not a tool that adaptively probes each logged entry
- No voice-AI interviewer to run the debrief phase automatically
- Debrief/monitoring depend on the researcher's manual check-ins rather than automated follow-up
- Analysis is a manual code-and-synthesize step, not an auto-generated report
よくあるご質問
「Photo Diary Study: Product Use in Context」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が8問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Diary check-in time! This takes about 6 minutes. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Answer for t…」・「When did this usage session happen?」・「Share a photo of the moment — your setup, surroundings, or what you were working with. No faces or private info needed.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、8問を約5分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。