QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Post-Viewing Property Evaluation Survey

Captures how a prospective buyer or renter evaluated a specific property right after a tour or showing — condition, price fairness, must-have features, and likelihood to move forward. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasons behind their interest level and any dealbreakers, giving agents and property managers insight closed-ended ratings alone can't provide.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for touring the property with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love your honest impressions while they're still fresh — this will take about 4-5 minutes and helps us understand what's working and what isn't.

Q02
選択式必須

How did you view the property?

  • In-person tour
  • Live virtual tour
  • Self-guided open house
  • Recorded video walkthrough only
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate the physical condition of the property?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Poor condition最大:Excellent condition
Q04
マトリクス必須

Please rate the following aspects of the property.

6行 × 5列
  • Layout & flow
  • Natural light
  • Kitchen & appliances
  • Storage space
  • Outdoor/yard space
  • ほか1件
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

Given the asking price (or rent), how would you rate the value of this property?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Overpriced最大:Excellent value
Q06
選択式必須

How likely are you to move forward (make an offer or apply) on this property?

  • Definitely will not proceed
  • Probably will not
  • Undecided
  • Probably will proceed
  • Definitely will proceed
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

When deciding on a property, which of these factors matter most to you?

  • Location
  • Asking price
  • Size / square footage
  • Overall condition
  • Natural light
  • Storage space
  • Outdoor space
  • School district / neighborhood reputation
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-proceed rating: what specifically drove that answer, and what would need to change to move them up or down a level. If they rated the property's value poorly, ask what price would feel fair. If they flagged low ratings on any single aspect in the matrix (light, storage, noise, etc.), ask whether that alone is a dealbreaker or just a minor concern. Anchor at least one question on the top factor they picked in the best-worst trade-off exercise.

Q09
自由回答（短文）

Was there anything about the property that could be a dealbreaker (e.g., structural issues, odor, layout problems)? Describe briefly if so.

Q10
選択式

Compared with other properties you've viewed recently, how does this one rank overall?

  • Best so far
  • Above average
  • About average
  • Below average
  • This is the only property I've viewed
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your current situation?

  • First-time homebuyer
  • Repeat homebuyer
  • Renter looking to rent
  • Property investor
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for sharing your impressions! Your feedback goes directly to the agent/property team to improve how this and future properties are presented.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the real reasoning behind a respondent's likelihood-to-proceed rating and surfaces dealbreakers in their own words
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scales on condition and value, a matrix on property aspects, and a MaxDiff on decision priorities) with open-ended context, giving agents both the 'what' and the 'why'
  • Segments respondents by viewing method, current situation, and age range, plus a direct ranking against other properties viewed, so results can be sliced by buyer type
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean property managers get clean, ready-to-use insight without manually reading every open-text answer

Jotform

Property Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready static form builder template for capturing property evaluation feedback, with Jotform's typical drag-and-drop customization and integrations. It's built for form completion rather than conversational depth, so it captures ratings but not the reasoning behind them. No AI-driven follow-up or automated interview scoring is part of the offering.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize and embed as a standard web form
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, PDF export)
  • Simple, familiar form-fill experience for respondents

物足りない点

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe dealbreakers or reasoning
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report
  • No transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI interviewing component

Typeform

Property Evaluation Form

A conversational-style, fielding-ready template well-suited to a friendly post-viewing feedback flow, leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX. It's still a fixed question set, so while the experience feels conversational, there's no actual adaptive branching based on respondent answers. Reporting is limited to Typeform's standard results dashboard rather than an AI-synthesized analysis.

優れている点

  • Polished, mobile-friendly conversational question flow
  • Good respondent experience and completion rates typical of Typeform forms
  • Simple to brand and share after a property showing

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — question flow is fixed, not driven by a respondent's actual answers
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • No auto-generated qualitative report synthesizing open-ended reasoning

よくあるご質問

「Post-Viewing Property Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for touring the property with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love your hones…」・「How did you view the property?」・「Overall, how would you rate the physical condition of the property?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Magazine Reader Engagement & Content Satisfaction Survey

Measures how readers actually consume a magazine — print or digital — how satisfied they are with specific sections, and which content types they'd trade off against each other. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each reader's satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing the specific articles, sections, or frustrations that closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Open House Visitor Feedback Survey

Captures how visitors reacted to a specific property right after touring it — first impressions, price perception, and likelihood to make an offer — for listing agents and sellers. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific hesitations or dealbreakers behind a visitor's purchase interest instead of settling for a generic rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Real Estate Visit Booking & Viewing Experience Survey

Captures how easy it was to book a property visit, whether the viewing matched expectations, and how likely the prospect is to move forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into hesitations and what would turn interest into an offer. Built for real estate agencies and property platforms tracking their showing pipeline.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Rental Application Experience Survey

Captures how prospective tenants experience the rental application process — from finding the listing to hearing back on a decision — including friction points around fees, documentation, and communication. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment things went smoothly or fell apart, giving property managers concrete fixes instead of a generic satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Prospective Tenant Interest & Decision Drivers Survey

Captures what prospective tenants are looking for, how they rate this property against alternatives, and how price-sensitive they are — with an AI follow-up interview that surfaces the specific hesitations and dealbreakers behind their likelihood-to-lease rating. Built for leasing teams and property managers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Real Estate Agent Performance & Referral Survey

Captures how buyers and sellers rate their agent on responsiveness, market knowledge, and negotiation, plus how likely they are to refer or reuse them. An AI follow-up reconstructs what actually happened during the negotiation and closing process, surfacing the specific moments that drove satisfaction or frustration.

テンプレートを見る