Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Real Estate Visit Booking & Viewing Experience Survey
Captures how easy it was to book a property visit, whether the viewing matched expectations, and how likely the prospect is to move forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into hesitations and what would turn interest into an offer. Built for real estate agencies and property platforms tracking their showing pipeline.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
How did you book this property visit?
- Called the agency
- Booked online through a website or app
- Messaged the agent directly
- Walked in without an appointment
- Agent reached out to me
Q03
評価スケール必須
How easy was it to schedule this visit?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q04
選択式必須
Did the agent arrive on time for the scheduled visit?
- Arrived early
- On time
- Slightly late (under 15 minutes)
- Significantly late (15+ minutes)
- Agent didn't show up
Q05
マトリクス必須
Please rate the following aspects of your visit.
5行 × 5列
- Agent's knowledge of the property
- How well the property matched the online listing
- Cleanliness and condition of the property
- The neighborhood, as experienced in person
- Value for the asking price
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to move forward with this property, for example by making an offer or scheduling a follow-up visit?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
AIインタビュー
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-proceed score. If the score is low or middling, identify the specific concern (price, condition, location, financing, competing property) and ask what would need to change for them to move forward. If the score is high, confirm what sealed the interest and whether anything is still holding them back from acting immediately.
Q08
選択式必須
Would you book another visit through this agent or agency for a different property?
- Yes, definitely
- Probably
- Probably not
- Definitely not
Q09
自由回答（長文）
What's one thing that would have made this visit more useful or comfortable?
Q10
選択式
Which best describes your current housing situation?
- First-time buyer
- Repeat buyer
- Renter looking to buy
- Investor
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式
Which age range do you fall into?
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to our showings team to help us improve how visits are booked and run.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond a static booking form by including an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasons behind a prospect's likelihood-to-proceed score and what would turn interest into an offer
- Covers the full visit lifecycle in one flow — booking method, scheduling ease, agent punctuality, a multi-aspect ratings matrix, and post-visit intent — rather than just capturing the initial booking request
- Pairs a quantitative likelihood-to-move-forward scale with open-ended and adaptive follow-up questions, so agencies get both trackable pipeline metrics and qualitative hesitation detail
- Includes housing situation and age range segmentation plus an agent/agency loyalty question, letting teams cut showing-pipeline performance by prospect type
SurveySparrow
Real Estate Visit Booking Form TemplateA ready-to-use booking form template focused on capturing visit scheduling details rather than post-visit experience or conversion intent. It's built on SurveySparrow's conversational form format, which is more engaging than a plain field-by-field form but still runs on fixed question logic. Best suited for the booking step itself, not for gathering feedback on how the viewing went.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style form format that's quick to deploy
- Purpose-built for the real estate visit-booking use case
- Part of a broader mainstream survey/form platform with established distribution options
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all questions are fixed at design time
- Appears focused on booking capture rather than post-visit experience, expectation match, or move-forward likelihood
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
Typeform
Real Estate Visit Booking Form TemplateA polished, one-question-at-a-time booking form template well suited for scheduling a property visit. Typeform is known for strong form design and UX, but this template is oriented toward intake/scheduling rather than capturing post-visit viewing experience or conversion signals. Follow-up logic is limited to conditional branching, not open-ended probing.
優れている点
- Strong, well-known form design and completion-rate optimization
- Easy embedding and sharing across web and email channels
- Simple to customize branding for an agency's booking page
物足りない点
- No AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into hesitations or what would convert interest into an offer
- Static question set with basic conditional logic, not adaptive per-response probing
- No built-in quality scoring of open-text responses or automated report generation
QuestionPro
Real Estate Survey TemplateA general-purpose real estate survey template rather than one specifically designed around the visit-booking-to-viewing-to-decision journey. It likely covers broader real estate satisfaction or market-research questions, which makes it less targeted than a visit-experience-specific instrument. Useful as a starting point but would need substantial customization for showing-pipeline tracking.
優れている点
- Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with analytics and reporting tools
- Flexible enough to be adapted to various real estate research needs beyond just visits
- Supports standard question types (ratings, multiple choice) common to survey design
物足りない点
- Not specifically structured around the book-visit-decide funnel, so it may miss visit-specific details like agent punctuality or scheduling ease
- No adaptive AI interview capability to explore why a prospect is or isn't moving forward
- No transparent, publishable prompt logic or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Real Estate Visit Booking & Viewing Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a moment to share feedback on your recent property visit! Your responses are completely confidential a…」・「How did you book this property visit?」・「How easy was it to schedule this visit?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。