Procurement Request & Approval Cycle Assessment
Diagnoses bottlenecks, clarity gaps, and cycle-time issues across procurement request and approval workflows. Designed for internal operations teams seeking data-driven improvements to purchasing processes based on employee feedback.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
How often do you typically submit or approve procurement requests?
- Daily
- Weekly
- Monthly
- Less than monthly
- Rarely/Never
In the past 30 days, how clear were the requirements for submitting a procurement request?
Which stages most often caused delays for you in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.
- Gathering specifications or requirements
- Vendor selection/quotes
- Budget or finance review
- Compliance or legal review
- Manager/functional approval
- PO creation or system entry
- System or tool issues
- None/No delays
- Not applicable
Are there any instructions or guidelines you found unclear or difficult to locate? If so, please describe.
Which department or function best describes your role?
- Procurement
- Finance
- Legal/Compliance
- IT
- Engineering
- Marketing
- Sales
- Operations
- HR
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will be used to identify and address bottlenecks in our procurement process. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.
How many procurement requests did you submit in the past 90 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11 or more
In the past 30 days, how satisfied were you with the time it took from submission to final approval?
Rank the following improvements by how much they would speed up your procurement approvals (1 = greatest impact).
- Clearer request guidelines and examples
- Fewer approval layers
- Faster response SLAs from reviewers
- More intuitive submission tool
- Pre-approved vendor lists
- Proactive status notifications
We'd like to explore your procurement experience in a bit more detail. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions.
What is your seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Director or above
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, how easy was it to find the documentation and guidelines needed to complete a procurement request?
What is your preferred channel for submitting procurement requests?
- Procurement portal
- Ticketing system
- Chat tool/assistant
- Other
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about the procurement request and approval process.
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, how responsive were the approvers or reviewers involved in your procurement requests?
Where is your primary work location?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Other
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, how easy was the procurement submission tool or system to use?
In the past 30 days, approximately how many business days did a typical approval take from submission to completion?
- Less than 1 day
- 1–2 days
- 3–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–15 days
- More than 15 days
- Not sure
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines quantitative diagnostics (opinion-scale ratings on requirement clarity, approval speed, tool usability, and approver responsiveness) with a dedicated multiple-choice question isolating exactly which stages caused delays in the past 30 days.
- Includes a ranking question so respondents prioritize which fixes would most reduce cycle time, giving ops teams a data-driven improvement backlog rather than just satisfaction scores.
- Adds an AI follow-up interview segment that probes deeper into each respondent's procurement experience beyond fixed-choice answers, plus open-text fields for unclear guidelines and general feedback.
- Captures role, seniority, tenure, and location dropdowns so bottleneck patterns can be segmented by department or level, and closes with an auto-generated report workflow — none of which static request forms provide.
Jotform
Field Trip Approval Request Form TemplateThis is a static intake/approval form for school field trips, not a procurement process or a diagnostic survey — the domain and purpose differ substantially from a procurement bottleneck assessment. It's useful only as a reference point for how Jotform structures generic request-approval forms.
優れている点
- Drag-and-drop form builder with quick customization
- Mobile-friendly submission and approval routing
- Large template library for simple request/approval workflows
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — it's a fixed-field form
- Not built for cycle-time or clarity diagnostics, and has no procurement-specific content
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
SurveySparrow
Overtime Request Form TemplateThis template is designed for employee overtime requests, an HR workflow rather than procurement, so it's not directly comparable in subject matter, though it shares the general 'request/approval process' category. It appears to be a conversational-style static form rather than a bottleneck-diagnostic instrument.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-like survey UI for better completion rates
- Positioned within a broader employee-experience survey suite
- Supports multi-channel distribution
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option for deeper probing
- Not tailored to procurement stages, delays, or approval-cycle diagnostics
- No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation evident
Typeform
Employee Time Off Request Form TemplateA polished conversational form for time-off requests, again an HR use case rather than procurement approval-cycle diagnostics. It's a fielding-ready request form, not a process-assessment survey with cycle-time or delay-cause analysis.
優れている点
- Clean, on-brand conversational question flow
- Simple one-question-at-a-time UX known to reduce drop-off
- Easy embedding into existing employee portals
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into individual pain points
- No procurement-specific bottleneck, delay-stage, or ranking questions
- No built-in automated quality scoring or AI-generated diagnostic report
よくあるご質問
「Procurement Request & Approval Cycle Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Procurement Request & Approval Process Survey. This survey asks about your recent experience submitting o…」・「How often do you typically submit or approve procurement requests?」・「In the past 30 days, how clear were the requirements for submitting a procurement request?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。