すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Proof Points and Credibility Evaluation Survey

Measures which proof points—case studies, testimonials, certifications, usage statistics, awards—actually build buyer confidence, and where the evidence in your marketing or sales materials falls flat. Built for B2B marketing and sales enablement teams pressure-testing collateral, with an AI follow-up that surfaces the exact detail that made one proof point believable and what still leaves prospects skeptical.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us understand what actually convinces buyers like you. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'll show you a few examples of the kind of proof points vendors use — case studies, stats, awards — and ask what does and doesn't land. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 3 months, which types of proof points have you encountered from (Replace with your company/vendor name)? (Template note: swap in the vendor or product whose materials you're testing.)

  • Customer case studies
  • Testimonials or quotes
  • Third-party awards or industry rankings
  • Security or compliance certifications
  • Usage or performance statistics
  • Analyst reports (e.g., Gartner, Forrester)
  • Live product demonstration
Q03
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Which of these types of proof points would most and least increase your trust in a vendor's claims?

  • Customer case studies
  • Customer testimonials or quotes
  • Third-party awards or industry rankings
  • Security or compliance certifications
  • Usage or performance statistics
  • Independent analyst reports
  • Live product demonstrations
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most convincing最も悪い:Least convincing
Q04
マトリクス必須

How credible does each of these sample proof-point statements feel to you? (Template note: replace with real headline stats, case-study results, and award claims from your own materials before launching.)

3行 × 5列
  • "Trusted by over 10,000 companies worldwide"
  • "Reduced onboarding time by 40% for Acme Corp"
  • "Rated #1 in customer satisfaction by (Analyst Firm)"
列: Not credible · Somewhat credible · Credible · Very credible · Extremely credible
Q05
評価スケール必須

In general, how credible do you find customer case studies as evidence of real-world results?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not credible at all最大:Extremely credible
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

Based on the proof points you've seen, how confident are you that (Replace with vendor/company name) can actually deliver on its claims?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Completely confident
Q07
テキストハイライト

Highlight the words or phrases below that make this proof point feel most credible — or least believable — to you.

(Template note: replace with an excerpt from your own case study, testimonial, or stats page before launching.) "Acme Corp cut manual reporting time by 40% within the first quarter of using our platfo…

Q08
選択式必須

What additional type of proof would most increase your confidence in a vendor's claims?

  • More detailed case studies with named customers
  • Independent or third-party verification
  • Ability to speak directly with a reference customer
  • A free trial or hands-on proof-of-concept
  • Raw data or methodology behind the statistics
  • Nothing else needed — current proof is sufficient
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reference the proof-point type the respondent ranked as most convincing in the trade-off question and ask for a concrete example of it working on them — what specifically did they read or see, and what detail made it feel real rather than marketing spin. If they cited a statistic or award, push on whether they checked the source or methodology, or would want to. Then probe what would still make them hesitant or skeptical, and if they picked the same category as least convincing for a competitor, ask what made the difference.

Q10
選択式

Which best describes your role in evaluating or purchasing this type of product?

  • Decision maker
  • Influencer or recommender
  • End user
  • Researcher or evaluator
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
プルダウン

How many employees does your organization have?

  • 1-50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • 1,001-5,000
  • 5,000+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which industry best describes your organization? (Template note: replace with the industry segments relevant to your buyers.)

  • Technology or software
  • Financial services
  • Healthcare
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail or consumer goods
  • Professional services
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will help us understand which proof points actually earn trust, so we can sharpen the evidence we put in front of buyers like you.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that references the specific proof-point type a respondent ranked as most convincing, then probes for the exact detail that made it believable and what still leaves them skeptical
  • Combines a MaxDiff exercise, credibility matrix, and text-highlight question so respondents mark the literal words/phrases in a sample proof point that feel credible, not just abstract ratings
  • Screens by role, company size, and industry so results can be segmented by who's actually evaluating the purchase
  • Ends with an automated report synthesizing which proof-point types (case studies, testimonials, certs, stats, awards) build confidence versus where the evidence falls flat

SurveyMonkey

Proof Points Survey Template

A directly comparable static template covering the same general topic of which proof points build buyer trust. It's a fielding-ready form but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive probing. No visibility into scoring methodology or how responses are synthesized into a report.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use template on an established survey platform with broad distribution and panel options
  • Likely includes standard question types (rating, multiple choice) suitable for quick fielding
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey logic and reporting dashboard

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into which specific detail made a proof point believable — respondents can't be probed beyond the fixed script
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for richer qualitative signal
  • No transparent, inspectable prompts or per-response quality scoring; methodology isn't published

よくあるご質問

「Proof Points and Credibility Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us understand what actually convinces buyers like you. Your responses are comple…」・「In the last 3 months, which types of proof points have you encountered from (Replace with your company/vendor name)? (Te…」・「Which of these types of proof points would most and least increase your trust in a vendor's claims?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る