Public Records (FOIA) Request Satisfaction Survey
Measures resident satisfaction with public records/FOIA request processes—covering clarity of guidance, response timelines, fee transparency, and overall ease—to help government agencies and civic organizations identify actionable improvement priorities.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Have you submitted a public records (FOIA) request in the last 12 months?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
How clear was the information about how to submit a public records request?
Approximately how many calendar days passed between submitting your request and receiving the initial response?
- 1–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–20 days
- 21–30 days
- More than 30 days
- I have not yet received a response
- Don't remember
Which types of fees, if any, did you encounter? Select all that apply.
- Per-page copying
- Electronic processing
- Hourly labor
- Mailing or shipping
- Certification or notarization
- I did not incur any fees
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how easy or difficult was the public records request process in your jurisdiction?
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your input will help improve the clarity, timelines, and costs of public records request processes. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
How did you submit your most recent public records request?
- Online portal
- In person
- Fax
- Other (please specify)
How clear was the information about what records are available for request?
How clear was the communication about the expected timeline for your request?
Approximately how much did you pay in total fees for your most recent public records request?
- $0 (no fees)
- $1–$10
- $11–$25
- $26–$50
- $51–$100
- More than $100
- Don't remember
Overall, how satisfied are you with the public records request process in your jurisdiction?
Which best describes your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the information about the fee structure and estimated costs?
Which of the following would be most helpful for tracking the status of a public records request? Select up to 3.
- Email updates
- Online portal status page
- Phone support
- Text/SMS alerts
- Assigned contact person
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how reasonable were the fees you paid for your public records request?
How likely are you to file a public records request in the next 12 months?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the information about exemptions and reasons records might be denied or redacted?
Did the costs associated with your request lead you to change your plans?
- No, costs did not affect my request
- Yes, I narrowed the scope of my request
- Yes, I canceled my request entirely
- Not applicable—I did not incur fees
If you could change one thing to improve the public records request process (clarity, timelines, or costs), what would it be?
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Unemployed, seeking work
- Not working by choice (student, caregiver, etc.)
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
How satisfied were you with any explanations provided for denials or redactions in your request?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with public records (FOIA) requests?
Which U.S. state or territory do you live in?
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- American Samoa
- Guam
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Puerto Rico
- U.S. Virgin Islands
- Other U.S. territory
- Prefer not to say
We'd like to learn more about your experience with public records requests. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions on clarity of submission guidance, records availability, fee structure, and exemption/denial explanations—not just generic satisfaction
- Captures the full request lifecycle: submission channel, elapsed calendar days, timeline communication clarity, fees encountered, and whether costs changed the requester's plans
- Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended feedback beyond the two open-text questions, surfacing specifics that fixed-choice scales miss
- Ends with demographic breakdowns (age, gender, education, employment, state) so agencies can segment satisfaction and identify equity gaps in access to records
SurveyMonkey
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general-purpose resident satisfaction template aimed at local government services broadly, not specifically at public records or FOIA request experiences. It would need substantial rewriting to cover fee transparency, exemption clarity, and request timelines. Useful as a generic starting point but not fielding-ready for FOIA-specific measurement.
優れている点
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics platform
- Likely easy to customize for broad municipal satisfaction topics
- Familiar interface for government staff already using SurveyMonkey
物足りない点
- No FOIA-specific questions on fee structure, exemptions, or request timelines out of the box
- Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a resident was dissatisfied
- No published methodology or per-response quality scoring for open-ended answers
SurveySparrow
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateAnother general resident satisfaction template covering local services broadly rather than the public records request process specifically. It lacks the granular fee, timeline, and denial-explanation questions needed to diagnose FOIA process friction. Would serve as a generic community feedback tool rather than a purpose-built FOIA satisfaction instrument.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that may improve completion rates
- Part of a broader community/civic template library
- Supports standard multiple-choice and rating question types
物足りない点
- No built-in questions addressing FOIA-specific pain points like fee transparency or exemption clarity
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig deeper into low satisfaction scores
- No transparent, publishable prompt/methodology documentation for any AI-assisted elements
よくあるご質問
「Public Records (FOIA) Request Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が27問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome and thank you for participating in this survey about your experience with public records (FOIA) requests. This s…」・「Have you submitted a public records (FOIA) request in the last 12 months?」・「How clear was the information about how to submit a public records request?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、27問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。