Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Remote Daily Scrum Effectiveness Survey
Measures whether your team's remote daily scrum actually surfaces blockers and aligns work, or has drifted into a status-reporting ritual. Covers time-boxing, psychological safety, format, and top friction points, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent example instead of vague impressions. Built for scrum masters, engineering managers, and agile coaches running distributed teams.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
In the last two weeks, how often did you attend your team's daily scrum?
- Every time
- Most days
- About half the time
- Rarely
- Never
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
How useful is the daily scrum for coordinating your work this sprint?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not useful at all最大:Extremely useful
Q04
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about your team's daily scrum?
5行 × 5列
- The meeting starts within a minute or two of the scheduled time
- Updates focus on blockers and dependencies, not a status recitation
- I leave knowing exactly what I need to do next
- The meeting stays within its time-box (typically 15 minutes)
- I feel comfortable raising a blocker or asking for help in the meeting
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
選択式必須
How is your daily scrum typically run?
- Live video call
- Live audio-only call
- Text or chat-based async update
- Rotating mix of the above
Q06
ランク付け必須
Rank these from biggest to smallest obstacle to a genuinely useful daily scrum for your team.
- Time zone conflicts
- Video call fatigue
- Status recitation with no real problem-solving
- Meeting runs long or drifts off-topic
- A few voices dominate the conversation
- Low attendance or chronic lateness
- Unclear next steps after the meeting ends
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to speak up in the daily scrum when you're stuck or behind on something?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q08
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct a specific, recent daily scrum for this respondent: what was said, whether a real blocker or dependency came up, and what happened after (did anyone follow up, or did it vanish once the call ended). Anchor on their lowest-rated statement or usefulness score and get a concrete example rather than a general opinion. If they said they're unlikely to speak up, probe what stops them — time-box pressure, who's in the room, or the format itself — and whether an async or written update would work better for them.
Q09
自由回答（長文）
If you could change one thing about your team's daily scrum, what would it be and why?
Q10
選択式
Which best describes your role on the team?
- Individual contributor / engineer
- Scrum master / team lead
- Product owner / manager
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式
How many time zones does your team typically span during the daily scrum?
- Same time zone
- 1-2 zones apart
- 3-5 zones apart
- More than 5 zones apart
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
Thanks for the candid feedback! We're combining these answers across the team to see where our daily scrum is working and where it needs a reset — no responses are shared individually.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific, recent daily scrum (what was said, who was blocked, what got resolved) instead of relying on vague Likert impressions
- Combines structured measurement (time-boxing frequency, a matrix of agreement statements, and a ranking of biggest obstacles) with open-ended diagnosis of what respondents would change and why
- Captures psychological safety directly by asking how likely people are to speak up when stuck or behind, not just whether the meeting 'felt useful'
- Segments results by role and by how many time zones the team spans, so distributed-team friction can be separated from format problems
SurveySparrow
Remote Daily Scrum TemplateThis is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template for the same use case: assessing remote daily scrum meetings. It's built as a static questionnaire on SurveySparrow's conversational-form platform, aimed at a similar scrum/engineering-manager audience. It doesn't appear to offer adaptive follow-up or per-response quality scoring based on the page title and known product design.
優れている点
- Purpose-built specifically for remote daily scrum feedback, matching audience intent closely
- Runs on SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style survey format
- Likely quick to deploy with pre-set questions for scrum-specific topics
物足りない点
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct a specific recent scrum instance
- No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports
- No published prompt-level methodology or transparency into how responses are interpreted
よくあるご質問
「Remote Daily Scrum Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We're looking at how well our remote daily scrum is actually working for the team. Your honest take helps us fix wha…」・「In the last two weeks, how often did you attend your team's daily scrum?」・「How useful is the daily scrum for coordinating your work this sprint?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。