すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Agile Sprint Retrospective Feedback Survey

Captures how a development team felt about the sprint that just ended — goal completion, planning accuracy, collaboration, and workload sustainability — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind blockers and missed goals instead of the sanitized version teams give in stand-up.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes for this sprint retrospective! Your honest input helps the team improve how we plan and work together. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with how this sprint went?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q03
選択式必須

Did the team complete the sprint goal?

  • Yes, fully
  • Mostly, with minor gaps
  • Partially
  • No, we missed it significantly
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this sprint?

5行 × 5列
  • Sprint planning estimates were realistic
  • Blockers were identified and resolved quickly
  • Communication within the team was clear
  • Work was distributed fairly across the team
  • Requirements were clear before we started
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Looking at this sprint, which factors helped progress the most, and which hurt it the most?

  • Clear requirements going in
  • Daily stand-ups
  • Pairing or code review support
  • Tooling / CI-CD reliability
  • Cross-team dependencies
  • Mid-sprint scope changes
  • Meeting load
  • Documentation quality
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Helped most最も悪い:Hurt most
Q06
評価スケール必須

How sustainable was the pace of work this sprint?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not sustainable, we were stretched thin最大:Very sustainable
Q07
自由回答(短文)

In one sentence, what was the single biggest blocker this sprint?

Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the real story behind this sprint's outcome. If the goal was missed or only partially met, find out at what point it became clear it was at risk and whether that was raised early or discovered late. Anchor on their stated biggest blocker and any low agreement/disagreement ratings from the sprint statements, and ask what would need to change next sprint to prevent the same issue. If they rated the sprint highly across the board, ask what specifically the team should keep doing.

Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you in the plan for next sprint?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not confident at all最大:Extremely confident
Q10
選択式

What is your role on this team?

  • Engineer / Developer
  • QA / Test
  • Product Manager
  • Designer
  • Scrum Master / Team Lead
  • Other
Q11
選択式

How long have you been on this team?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed directly into the team's retrospective discussion and next sprint's planning.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that probes the real story behind missed or partially completed goals, going beyond the surface-level answer given in stand-up
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scale for satisfaction, rating for pace sustainability, matrix for agreement statements, max diff for what helped vs. hurt progress) with open-ended short text on blockers
  • Segments respondents by role and tenure on the team, so retro feedback can be analyzed by context (e.g., new joiners vs. veterans)
  • Closes with an automated report generation step so the team retro data feeds directly into a usable summary rather than raw spreadsheet exports

SurveyMonkey

Sprint Retrospective Questions Template

A ready-to-field template with a preset list of sprint retrospective questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It's a static question set aimed at general survey builders rather than one designed specifically for agile teams' nuanced blocker/goal-completion dynamics. No mention of any conversational or adaptive follow-up capability.

優れている点

  • Mature, well-known survey platform with broad distribution options
  • Built-in analytics and reporting dashboard
  • Simple to deploy quickly for teams already using SurveyMonkey

物足りない点

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe missed goals or blockers further
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored

Jotform

Agile Retrospective Form Template

A drag-and-drop form template positioned within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, useful for quickly customizing field types and layout. It reads as a form-building starting point rather than a purpose-built research instrument with scoring or analysis logic. No indication of any AI-driven interviewing or automated quality scoring of responses.

優れている点

  • Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Easy integration with other Jotform workflows and apps
  • Free tier available for basic form usage

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig past sanitized stand-up answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • Static form fields only, with no follow-up logic tied to specific answers like missed sprint goals

Typeform

Retrospective Survey Template

A conversational-style, one-question-at-a-time survey template that offers a more engaging respondent experience than a traditional form. However, the flow is still pre-scripted rather than dynamically generated, and the page doesn't indicate any capability to ask context-aware follow-up questions based on a given answer. It's a general retrospective template, not one tailored to sprint-specific concepts like planning accuracy or velocity.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
  • Simple template structure that's easy to brand and customize
  • Established platform with broad integrations

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to probe blockers in depth
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • No transparent published prompts or methodology behind question design

よくあるご質問

「Agile Sprint Retrospective Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes for this sprint retrospective! Your honest input helps the team improve how we plan and…」・「Overall, how satisfied are you with how this sprint went?」・「Did the team complete the sprint goal?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る