QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Nonprofit & Civic

Resident Input on Municipal Budget Priorities

Gathers resident feedback on city service satisfaction, spending priorities, and fiscal trade-offs to inform local government budget planning and resource allocation decisions.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全16問・約8分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Municipal Budget Priorities Survey. This survey collects your input on city services and how public funds should be allocated. Your responses will help inform budget decisions for the upcoming fiscal year. • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest opinions. • All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate. • Estimated completion time: 5–7 minutes. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
選択式

Which best describes your connection to [Municipality Name]?

  • I live in the municipality
  • I own property here but live elsewhere
  • I work or study here but live elsewhere
  • I do not live, work, or study here
Q03
選択式

In the past 12 months, which city services did you personally use? Select all that apply.

  • Parks or recreation programs
  • Public library
  • Transit or paratransit
  • Recreation center or pool
  • Street maintenance requests (e.g., pothole repair)
  • Public safety services (non-emergency)
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above
Q04
ランク付け

Please rank the following areas the city should prioritize over the next two years, from highest to lowest priority.

  1. Public safety
  2. Street and road maintenance
  3. Affordable housing
  4. Parks and recreation
  5. Public transit
  6. Economic development
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q05
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, what specific projects or service improvements do you think should be funded in the next budget cycle?

Q06
プルダウン

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65–74
  • 75 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform budget decisions for the upcoming fiscal year. Summary results will be shared publicly on the municipality's website.

Q08
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with the quality of the city services you have used in the past 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q09
オピニオンスケール

If a property tax increase of about 2–3% were proposed to maintain current service levels, to what extent would you support or oppose it?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly oppose最大:Strongly support
Q10
AIインタビュー

We'd like to learn more about your budget priorities. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q11
選択式

How do you describe your gender? Select all that apply.

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

When balancing the city's budget, which approach do you most prefer?

  • Increase taxes to maintain or improve services
  • Reduce service levels to avoid tax increases
  • Use reserves short-term while creating a long-term plan
  • A combination of the above approaches
  • Unsure / need more information
Q13
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school
  • High school diploma or GED
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
選択式

What is your current employment status? Select all that apply.

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed, looking for work
  • Unemployed, not looking for work
  • Student
  • Retired
  • Unable to work
  • Caregiver or homemaker
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
プルダウン

Which best describes your current housing situation?

  • Own my home
  • Rent
  • Live with family or roommates without paying rent
  • Temporary housing
  • Currently unhoused
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
プルダウン

Which area of the municipality do you consider home?

  • North
  • South
  • East
  • West
  • Central / Downtown
  • Across multiple areas
  • Outside the municipality
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured questions (service usage, satisfaction scale, priority ranking, tax trade-off scale, budget approach preference) with an open-text follow-up and an AI-moderated interview to probe the 'why' behind each resident's priorities.
  • Includes a dedicated fiscal trade-off item (2-3% property tax increase scenario) directly tied to budget planning, not just general satisfaction.
  • Captures demographic and geographic context (age, education, employment, housing, home area) so results can be segmented by neighborhood or resident type for planning decisions.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean city staff get analysis-ready output rather than raw survey exports.

Jotform

Budget Planning Form Template

This is a general-purpose budget planning form template rather than one built specifically for municipal resident input; it looks geared toward organizational or personal budget intake rather than gathering public opinion on city spending trade-offs. It's a static, ready-to-use form builder template, useful for structured data collection but not for open-ended resident sentiment.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy as a standard form
  • Jotform's broad form-building and integration ecosystem
  • Likely customizable fields for line-item budget entry

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or interview capability
  • Not specifically designed for resident/municipal satisfaction context
  • No published methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

SurveyMonkey

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

A purpose-built resident satisfaction survey, directly relevant to municipal service feedback, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It appears to be a static question set focused on general satisfaction rather than budget-specific trade-offs or prioritization ranking.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking
  • Purpose-built for resident/government feedback use cases
  • Easy distribution and response collection at scale

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning
  • No voice AI interview option
  • Unclear whether it includes explicit fiscal trade-off or spending-priority ranking questions

SurveySparrow

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

Another dedicated resident satisfaction template, conversational-style UI is SurveySparrow's known strength, making it relevant for community feedback collection. It appears focused on general service satisfaction rather than the specific budget trade-off and prioritization mechanics needed for fiscal planning.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format for higher engagement
  • Built specifically for community/resident feedback
  • Simple setup for recurring satisfaction tracking

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up
  • No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published
  • Likely lacks a dedicated tax/spending trade-off or ranking question set

Typeform

Budget Planning Form Template

This is a general budget planning form template, not one designed around municipal resident feedback or fiscal trade-off scenarios; it seems oriented toward budget intake for a business, project, or personal use. It's a static, conversational-style form, good for structured data entry rather than open-ended opinion gathering.

優れている点

  • Typeform's polished, conversational form design
  • Easy to embed and share
  • Good for simple structured budget data collection

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or interview capability
  • Not tailored to municipal/resident satisfaction or spending-priority context
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

よくあるご質問

「Resident Input on Municipal Budget Priorities」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が16問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to the Municipal Budget Priorities Survey. This survey collects your input on city services and how public fund…」・「Which best describes your connection to [Municipality Name]?」・「In the past 12 months, which city services did you personally use? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、16問を約8分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Fundraising Message & CTA Effectiveness Survey

Tests donor-facing messages and calls to action to identify which language most motivates giving. Designed for nonprofit marketing teams seeking data-driven guidance on fundraising communications.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Resident 311 Service Quality & Responsiveness Survey

Measures resident satisfaction with municipal 311 non-emergency services across submission channels, response timeliness, resolution outcomes, and institutional trust to guide service improvement priorities.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Community Service Gaps & Priorities Assessment

A structured needs assessment for local governments and nonprofits to identify residents' service priorities, access barriers, and communication preferences to guide resource allocation.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Resident Trust & Accountability in Local Government

Measures resident perceptions of trust, fairness, transparency, and accountability in local public services. Designed for municipal governments and civic organizations seeking actionable feedback to improve governance and resident relations.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Resident Zoning Engagement Preferences Survey

Measures resident awareness, barriers, and channel/format preferences for zoning and land use public engagement. Designed for municipal planning departments seeking to improve community outreach equity and participation rates.

テンプレートを見る
Nonprofit & Civic

Local Government Project Community Engagement Poll

Gauges resident awareness, support, and concerns for a local government project — plus which design option they favor and how they want ongoing updates. An AI follow-up probes the reasoning behind each support score, surfacing what would actually shift an opponent or strengthen a supporter's backing.

テンプレートを見る