QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Privacy & Compliance

Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey

Measures employee perceptions of phishing simulation realism, behavioral responses, confidence changes, and training preferences to help security teams optimize their awareness programs.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This brief survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with recent phishing simulations at this organization. Your responses are completely confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve security awareness training. Participation is voluntary, you may stop at any time, and there are no right or wrong answers—we simply want your honest opinions. Thank you for your time.

Q02
選択式

Have you ever received a phishing simulation email from this employer?

  • Yes, at this employer
  • Yes, but only at a previous employer
  • No, never
  • Not sure
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how realistic did the most recent phishing simulation feel?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all realistic最大:Extremely realistic
Q04
オピニオンスケール

Before your most recent simulation, how confident were you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q05
ランク付け

Please rank the following training formats from most helpful to least helpful.

  1. Interactive phishing simulations
  2. Short videos (≤3 minutes)
  3. Live workshops or webinars
  4. Job aid or one-page checklist
  5. Email tips or newsletters
  6. Microlearning modules (5–10 minutes)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q06
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses in this survey, what suggestions do you have for improving future phishing simulations or related security training? Please share any specifics.

Q07
プルダウン

On a typical workday, approximately how many emails do you handle?

  • 0–24
  • 25–74
  • 75–149
  • 150+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for participating! Your feedback will directly help us make phishing simulations and security training more relevant and effective.

Q09
選択式

When was the most recent phishing simulation you recall receiving from this employer?

  • Within the last 7 days
  • 2–4 weeks ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • More than 3 months ago
  • I don't recall
  • Not applicable—I haven't received one here
Q10
選択式

Which aspects of the simulation felt realistic? Select all that apply.

  • Sender name and email address
  • Subject line
  • Email body content and tone
  • Visual design and branding
  • Call-to-action (link or attachment)
  • Timing of delivery
  • None of the above
Q11
オピニオンスケール

Today, how confident are you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q12
選択式

How frequently would you prefer to receive phishing simulations?

  • Twice per month
  • Monthly
  • Every 2 months
  • Quarterly
  • Twice per year
  • Once per year
Q13
プルダウン

Which of the following best describes your primary job function?

  • Engineering/IT
  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Human Resources
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Marketing/Communications
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
選択式

Thinking about your most recent simulation from this employer, what did you do? Select all that apply.

  • Reported it using the reporting tool/process
  • Deleted it without interacting
  • Clicked a link or opened an attachment
  • Replied to the message
  • Ignored it and took no action
  • Asked a colleague or IT for advice
  • Marked it as spam/junk
  • I don't recall
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How difficult was it to identify the most recent simulation as a phishing attempt?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very easy to identify最大:Very difficult to identify
Q16
選択式

What, if anything, did you learn or reinforce from the simulation(s)? Select all that apply.

  • How to use the report button or process
  • How to inspect URLs safely
  • Common red flags to watch for
  • How to verify sender identity
  • To pause and validate urgent requests
  • Where to find internal guidance/resources
  • Nothing new to me
Q17
プルダウン

How long have you worked at this organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
選択式

Which cues, if any, did you notice in the simulation? Select all that apply.

  • Suspicious sender or domain
  • Generic greeting or unusual salutation
  • Spelling or grammar errors
  • Urgent or threatening language
  • Unexpected attachment
  • Mismatched or odd-looking URL
  • Unusual request for sensitive data
  • Off-brand visuals or layout
  • Timing felt unusual (e.g., outside business hours)
  • I did not notice any specific cues
Q19
オピニオンスケール

In the next 30 days, how likely are you to change any of your email habits based on these simulations (e.g., reporting suspicious messages faster, inspecting links more carefully)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q20
プルダウン

In which region are you primarily based?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes respondents on their own suggestions for improving the phishing program, rather than stopping at closed-ended ratings
  • Combines opinion-scale confidence tracking (before vs. today) with multiple-choice behavioral recall questions, so you can measure both perceived and self-reported behavior change from the same simulation event
  • Uses ranking and preference questions (training format ranking, frequency preference) to directly inform program redesign, not just measure satisfaction
  • Ends with auto-generated reporting and transparent prompts, so security teams can see exactly what was asked in the AI portion and trust the resulting summary

SurveySparrow

Post Training Survey Template | Feedback From Employees

This is a general post-training feedback template, not specific to phishing or security awareness, so questions would need heavy customization to fit a phishing simulation use case. It's a ready-to-field form with SurveySparrow's conversational-style UI. There's no built-in mechanism for adaptive probing into why someone clicked or reported a simulated email.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format that can feel less clinical than a standard form
  • Purpose-built for employee training feedback, so core structure (satisfaction, relevance, usefulness) transfers reasonably well

物足りない点

  • Not phishing-specific out of the box, requiring manual rebuilding of simulation-related questions
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

QuestionPro

Training Effectiveness Survey Questions | Post-Training Evaluation Sample Template

This template targets general training effectiveness evaluation (e.g., Kirkpatrick-style questions) rather than phishing simulations specifically. It's a fielding-ready template within a full-featured survey platform, useful as a starting point but not tailored to security awareness behaviors or cues. Teams would need to add phishing-specific items themselves.

優れている点

  • Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with broad question-type support and analytics
  • Structured around established training-evaluation frameworks, useful for benchmarking general learning outcomes

物足りない点

  • No phishing simulation-specific content (realism, cues noticed, click/report behavior)
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI interview option — follow-up questions are static and pre-written
  • No transparent, per-question AI prompt disclosure or automated quality scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

Security Awareness Survey Template

This is the most directly comparable template, covering general security awareness rather than phishing simulation specifics like realism, cues noticed, or confidence shift after a simulation. It's a ready-to-use static form backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and reporting tools. It would need supplementing to capture pre/post confidence and training-format preferences in the depth QuestionPunk's template does.

優れている点

  • Well-known, easy-to-deploy platform with strong distribution and basic reporting/dashboards
  • Covers broad security awareness topics that overlap with phishing training programs

物足りない点

  • Focused on general security awareness, not simulation-specific realism, cues, or behavioral recall
  • Fixed-question static form with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! This brief survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with recent phishing simulations at thi…」・「Have you ever received a phishing simulation email from this employer?」・「Overall, how realistic did the most recent phishing simulation feel?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Privacy & Compliance

RBAC Clarity & Access Control Confidence Assessment

Measures how well product administrators understand role-based access control concepts, permission scopes, and inheritance behaviors. Use this to identify confusion points, predictability gaps, and documentation needs that impact governance and security posture.

テンプレートを見る
Privacy & Compliance

Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey

Measures how well employees recognize threats, follow security policy, and actually behave when something looks suspicious — not just what training they sat through. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt to surface the gaps that policy audits miss.

テンプレートを見る
Privacy & Compliance

Employee Phishing Readiness & Security Behavior Assessment

Measures employee phishing detection confidence, reporting behavior, and security practices to identify organizational risk gaps and prioritize awareness training investments.

テンプレートを見る
Privacy & Compliance

Employee Computer Security Awareness & Behavior Survey

Measures how employees actually handle passwords, multi-factor authentication, updates, and suspicious messages day to day — not just what they know in theory. Built for IT and security teams auditing awareness programs, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real near-miss or incident instead of a hypothetical one.

テンプレートを見る
Privacy & Compliance

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Privacy & Compliance

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る