すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Student Feedback on Teacher Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's clarity, fairness, engagement, and support, plus which qualities matter most to learning. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall recommendation score, surfacing concrete examples instead of vague praise or complaints.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全11問・約6分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback about your teacher this term. Your answers help improve teaching for future students and stay confidential. About 5 minutes.

Q02
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?

5行 × 5列
  • Explained concepts clearly
  • Encouraged questions and participation
  • Provided timely feedback on assignments
  • Was fair and consistent in grading
  • Made the subject engaging
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this teacher to another student?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q04
選択式

In the past month, how often did you seek extra help from this teacher (office hours, email, or after class)?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more
Q05
評価スケール必須

How clear was the feedback you received on your assignments or exams?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not clear at all最大:Extremely clear
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

From this list of teaching qualities, which matters most to your learning and which matters least?

  • Explains concepts clearly
  • Is approachable and available for help
  • Grades fairly and consistently
  • Gives timely feedback
  • Makes class engaging
  • Adapts teaching to student needs
  • Communicates expectations clearly
  • Shows enthusiasm for the subject
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most to my learning最も悪い:Matters least to my learning
Q07
選択式

Which part of this teacher's class helped you learn the most?

  • Lectures or explanations
  • Class discussions
  • Homework or practice problems
  • Group work
  • One-on-one help
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific moment or example behind the respondent's overall recommendation score for this teacher: what happened, in what class or assignment, and how it made them feel about the teacher. If the score was low, probe what specifically fell short and whether it was a one-time issue or a pattern. If high, probe what the teacher did that other teachers typically don't.

Q09
自由回答(長文)

What one change would most improve this teacher's class for future students?

Q10
選択式

What is your current grade level or year?

  • Freshman/9th grade
  • Sophomore/10th grade
  • Junior/11th grade
  • Senior/12th grade
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ

All done — thank you! Your responses will be reviewed alongside other students' feedback to help this teacher and the school improve teaching quality.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the specific moment behind each student's recommendation score, turning vague praise or complaints into concrete examples
  • Combines structured measurement (agreement matrix on clarity/fairness/engagement/support, clarity-of-feedback rating, recommend-likelihood scale) with a max-diff exercise to rank which teaching qualities matter most to learning
  • Captures behavioral context (how often students sought extra help, which part of class helped most, grade level) alongside open-ended improvement suggestions for richer, more actionable reports
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports mean staff don't have to manually sift open-text comments to find the useful ones

Jotform

Math Department Student Feedback For Teachers Form Template

A subject-specific (math department) static form for collecting student feedback on teachers, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a ready-to-use template but narrowly scoped to one department rather than general teacher effectiveness. No mechanism is shown for probing into why a student rated something the way they did.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize within Jotform's broad form-builder ecosystem
  • Fielding-ready template with existing question set
  • Fits naturally into schools already using Jotform for other forms

物足りない点

  • Static question list only — no adaptive follow-up to dig into a specific low or high rating
  • Scoped to a math department context rather than teacher effectiveness broadly
  • No automated scoring of response quality or auto-generated analysis report

SurveySparrow

Teacher Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style teacher feedback template designed for both online and offline classes, reflecting SurveySparrow's chat-like form format. It's a fielding-ready template but relies on fixed questions rather than dynamic probing. Good for general rollout across class formats, but comment fields likely stay generic without follow-up.

優れている点

  • Conversational one-question-at-a-time format may boost completion rates
  • Explicitly supports both online and offline class contexts
  • Ready to deploy without additional setup

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to surface the specific moment behind a student's rating
  • No stated per-response quality scoring or automated report generation
  • Prompt/question logic isn't published for transparency

Typeform

Free Teacher Feedback Form Template

A free, general-purpose teacher feedback form using Typeform's signature clean one-question-per-screen design. It's a fielding-ready static template, well-suited for quick deployment, but it doesn't drill down into individual student experiences beyond the questions asked upfront. Analysis of open comments would be manual.

優れている点

  • Polished, on-brand user experience with strong completion-friendly design
  • Free to use, lowering the barrier to try it
  • Simple to embed or share via link

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up interview to reconstruct the reasoning behind a score
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated reporting
  • No voice-based interview option for richer qualitative input

よくあるご質問

「Student Feedback on Teacher Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback about your teacher this term. Your answers help improve teachin…」・「How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?」・「How likely are you to recommend this teacher to another student?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る