すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Student Interest in Course Topics and Activities Survey

Measures which topics, formats, and learning activities genuinely capture student curiosity versus which ones fall flat, for instructors and instructional designers refining a course or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment interest sparked or died, surfacing detail that ratings alone can't reveal.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest reactions to this course! We want to know what topics and activities actually grab your attention (and which ones don't) so we can make it better. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how interested have you been in the material covered in this course so far?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Not interested at all最大:Extremely interested
Q03
マトリクス必須

How interested are you in each of the following topics? (Template note: replace with the actual unit or topic list for this course before launching.)

4行 × 5列
  • (Replace with Topic A)
  • (Replace with Topic B)
  • (Replace with Topic C)
  • (Replace with Topic D)
列: Not at all interested · Slightly interested · Moderately interested · Very interested · Extremely interested
Q04
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

From this list of topics covered this term, pick the one you find most interesting and the one you find least interesting each round. (Template note: replace with your actual topic list, 6-9 items.)

  • (Replace with Topic A)
  • (Replace with Topic B)
  • (Replace with Topic C)
  • (Replace with Topic D)
  • (Replace with Topic E)
  • (Replace with Topic F)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most interesting最も悪い:Least interesting
Q05
選択式必須

Which single factor most drives whether you get interested in a topic?

  • It feels relevant to my future career
  • It's genuinely new or surprising to me
  • The way it's taught makes it click
  • It connects to something in my own life
  • It's challenging in a satisfying way
Q06
ランク付け必須

Rank these learning activities from most to least effective at increasing your interest in a topic.

  1. Lecture with slides
  2. Small-group discussion
  3. Hands-on project or lab
  4. Real-world case study
  5. Video or multimedia
  6. Guest speaker or expert Q&A
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
評価スケール必須

How likely are you to choose an elective or advanced course in this subject area?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q08
自由回答(短文)

What's one topic or activity you wish this course spent more time on?

Q09
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent about the topic they rated lowest in the interest questions: what specifically made it feel boring or irrelevant, and whether a different format or example would have changed that. Then ask about their highest-rated topic or activity and reconstruct the exact moment interest kicked in. If they said they're unlikely to take further courses in the subject, probe whether that's about the subject itself or how it's been taught.

Q10
選択式

What year or grade level are you currently in?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year or beyond
  • Graduate student
Q11
選択式

What is your primary field of study or major?

  • Sciences
  • Engineering or Technology
  • Humanities
  • Business
  • Arts
  • Social Sciences
  • Undecided
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything - thank you! Your answers feed directly into how this course's topics and activities get redesigned for future terms.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a matrix rating topics and a max-diff exercise to pinpoint exactly which topics spark curiosity versus which ones don't
  • Pairs a ranked list of learning activities with an AI follow-up interview that asks about the specific topic each student rated lowest, surfacing the moment interest died
  • Captures downstream signal via a likelihood-to-take-an-elective question and open-ended 'wish we'd spent more time on' feedback, plus field-of-study and year level for segmentation
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean instructors get synthesized findings, not just raw spreadsheet data

Jotform

Student Interest Survey Form Template

A static, drag-and-drop form template for gauging student interest, easy to customize with Jotform's form builder and widgets. It's built for quick deployment rather than deep qualitative insight. No mention of adaptive questioning or AI-assisted analysis.

優れている点

  • Fast to deploy and customize via a familiar drag-and-drop builder
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's platform
  • Free-tier accessible template, low setup friction

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up when a student's answer signals strong disinterest or curiosity
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated quality scoring or synthesized report generation - raw responses require manual analysis

Typeform

Student Interest Survey Form Template

A polished, conversational-style form template that walks students through interest questions one at a time, well-suited to boosting completion rates. It remains a static question flow rather than a true interview. Reporting depends on Typeform's standard analytics dashboards.

優れている点

  • Engaging one-question-at-a-time interface that tends to improve completion rates
  • Clean, mobile-friendly design out of the box
  • Logic-jump branching for basic conditional paths

物足りない点

  • Branching logic is pre-scripted, not a genuine adaptive AI probe into an individual's specific answer
  • No voice-based interview or screen-share task capability
  • No transparent per-response quality scoring or automatic qualitative report generation

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

This page is closer to a course/teacher evaluation guide with sample question banks than a narrowly focused, ready-to-field topic-interest survey; instructors would need to assemble and adapt questions themselves. It suits broad course-quality feedback more than pinpointing which specific topics or activities spark curiosity. Reporting relies on QuestionPro's general dashboard/analytics tools.

優れている点

  • Large bank of sample evaluation questions covering instructor and course quality broadly
  • Established survey platform with standard reporting and cross-tabulation features
  • Applicable across many course types, not narrowly scoped

物足りない点

  • Presented as a question-bank/guide rather than a single ready-to-field template focused on topic-level interest
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore why a specific topic or activity fell flat
  • No voice AI interviews, guided screen-share tasks, or automated per-response quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Student Interest in Course Topics and Activities Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest reactions to this course! We want to know what topics and activitie…」・「Overall, how interested have you been in the material covered in this course so far?」・「How interested are you in each of the following topics? (Template note: replace with the actual unit or topic list for t…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る