QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Speaker Request & Topic Interest Survey

Captures which speakers, topics, and formats your audience actually wants for upcoming events, so you can prioritize outreach with confidence instead of guessing. An AI follow-up interview digs into why a specific speaker or topic matters to the respondent and what problem they're hoping the session solves.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for helping us plan future sessions! We'd love to know which speakers and topics would be most valuable to you. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 7 minutes.

Q02
自由回答（短文）

Is there a specific speaker or expert you'd like us to invite? Feel free to name them (e.g., '(Replace with example: a named industry expert or author)').

Q03
選択式必須

Which topics would be most valuable for us to cover in upcoming sessions?

  • (Replace with Topic A relevant to your industry)
  • (Replace with Topic B relevant to your industry)
  • (Replace with Topic C relevant to your industry)
  • (Replace with Topic D relevant to your industry)
Q04
ランク付け必須

Rank these same topics from most to least important to you right now.

  1. (Replace with Topic A relevant to your industry)
  2. (Replace with Topic B relevant to your industry)
  3. (Replace with Topic C relevant to your industry)
  4. (Replace with Topic D relevant to your industry)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q05
選択式

What session format would you find most useful?

  • Keynote presentation
  • Interactive workshop
  • Panel discussion
  • Fireside chat / Q&A
  • Recorded webinar
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

If we booked a speaker on your top-ranked topic, how likely would you be to attend?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
マトリクス必須

How important is each of the following when we're choosing a speaker to invite?

5行 × 5列
  • Deep expertise in the topic
  • Ability to present engagingly
  • Name recognition in the industry
  • Practical, actionable takeaways
  • Availability for Q&A
列: Not important · Slightly important · Important · Very important · Essential
Q08
ポイント配分

You have 100 points to allocate across these factors based on what matters most when picking a speaker. Split them however you like.

  • Topic relevance
  • Speaker's reputation
  • Presentation quality
  • Cost/budget fit
  • Format flexibility
100ポイントを配分
Q09
AIインタビュー

Explore why the respondent named the specific speaker or topic they did: what problem, question, or gap are they hoping this session addresses, and what would make the session a disappointment versus a success for them? If they didn't name a specific speaker, probe what would make their top-ranked topic feel urgent enough to prioritize attending. Anchor on concrete examples from their recent work, not general interest.

Q10
選択式

What would most likely stop you from attending a session on your preferred topic?

  • Scheduling conflicts
  • Cost of attendance
  • Unclear value for my role
  • Format doesn't suit me
  • Nothing would stop me
Q11
自由回答（短文）

Your job title or role

Q12
選択式

Which best describes your organization's size?

  • 1-10 employees
  • 11-50 employees
  • 51-200 employees
  • 201-1000 employees
  • 1000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your requests directly shape who we invite and what we cover in upcoming sessions.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a simple intake form by using ranking and a 100-point constant-sum allocation to quantify which topics and selection factors actually matter most to respondents, not just which ones they check off.
  • An AI follow-up interview automatically digs into why a respondent named a specific speaker or topic and what problem they're hoping the session solves — insight a static form can't capture.
  • Pairs a matrix on speaker-selection criteria with a likelihood-to-attend opinion scale and a question on what would stop attendance, giving event planners both demand signal and risk factors in one flow.
  • Closes with role and organization-size questions so responses can be segmented by audience type when prioritizing outreach.

Jotform

Nonprofit Organization Speaker Request Form Template

This is a static intake form for collecting speaker requests for a nonprofit, not a survey exploring audience topic preferences. It's fielding-ready as a basic request form but doesn't attempt to prioritize topics or probe respondent motivation. Useful for logging who wants a speaker, not for deciding which speakers or topics to prioritize.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy from Jotform's large template library
  • Likely easy to customize fields and branding without technical setup
  • Fits directly into existing nonprofit request/intake workflows

物足りない点

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to understand why a speaker or topic matters
  • No built-in ranking, point-allocation, or matrix questions to quantify topic priority
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated insight report

SurveySparrow

Speaker Request Form Template

A conversational-style form aimed at streamlining speaker booking requests, in line with SurveySparrow's chat-like UX. It's a ready-to-field template but is oriented toward logistics of a request rather than surfacing which topics or speakers an audience actually wants across a group. No indication it explores respondent reasoning behind a request.

優れている点

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time format that may feel more engaging than a static form
  • Likely mobile-friendly given SurveySparrow's product focus
  • Part of a broader survey platform, so basic branching logic is probably available

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the reasoning behind a requested speaker or topic
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

よくあるご質問

「Speaker Request & Topic Interest Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for helping us plan future sessions! We'd love to know which speakers and topics would be most valuable to you. Y…」・「Is there a specific speaker or expert you'd like us to invite? Feel free to name them (e.g., '(Replace with example: a n…」・「Which topics would be most valuable for us to cover in upcoming sessions?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Statement of Work Clarity & Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates how clearly a Statement of Work defined scope, deliverables, timelines, pricing, and change control for a specific client-vendor engagement, and how well execution matched what was written. Built for procurement, PMO, and agency teams reviewing SOW quality after project close, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Student Interest in Course Topics and Activities Survey

Measures which topics, formats, and learning activities genuinely capture student curiosity versus which ones fall flat, for instructors and instructional designers refining a course or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment interest sparked or died, surfacing detail that ratings alone can't reveal.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Seminar Registration Interest & Topic Fit Survey

Gauges why professionals are weighing whether to register for your seminar, which session topics and formats matter most, and what price feels fair — built for event, association, and marketing teams planning a conference, workshop, or webinar series. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reason a likely-to-attend score is high or low, beyond a checkbox answer.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.

テンプレートを見る