Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll
Finds the best date, time, and format for an upcoming meeting or event by checking real availability against a shortlist of options — for anyone coordinating a group across busy calendars. The AI follow-up digs into the scheduling conflicts and recurring constraints that a simple poll misses, so organizers don't pick a slot that quietly excludes key people.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
マトリクス必須
How well does each proposed date and time work for you? (Template note: replace these rows with your actual candidate dates/times before sending.)
3行 × 3列
- (Replace with Option A: e.g., Tue Oct 14, 10:00 AM)
- (Replace with Option B: e.g., Wed Oct 15, 2:00 PM)
- (Replace with Option C: e.g., Thu Oct 16, 9:00 AM)
列: Works great · Could work · Doesn't work
Q03
ランク付け必須
Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.
- (Replace with Option A)
- (Replace with Option B)
- (Replace with Option C)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q04
プルダウン必須
What time zone should we use when scheduling you?
- Pacific (PT)
- Mountain (MT)
- Central (CT)
- Eastern (ET)
- UK / GMT
- Central Europe (CET)
- India (IST)
- China / Singapore (CST/SGT)
- Japan / Korea (JST/KST)
- Other
Q05
選択式
What meeting format works best for you?
- In person
- Virtual
- Hybrid (some in person, some virtual)
- No strong preference
Q06
選択式
Which days of the week generally work best for you, aside from the specific dates above?
- Monday
- Tuesday
- Wednesday
- Thursday
- Friday
- Saturday
- Sunday
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須
How flexible is your schedule during this window if none of the proposed options end up working?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not flexible at all最大:Extremely flexible
Q08
オピニオンスケール
How important is it to you personally that this meeting happens?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not important at all最大:Extremely important
Q09
自由回答（短文）
Any recurring conflicts or constraints we should know about (e.g., standing meetings, school pickup, travel)?
Q10
AIインタビュー
Probe the respondent's real availability behind their ratings: for any date/time they marked 'Could work' or 'Doesn't work,' find out exactly what the conflict is and whether it's fixed or movable. If they flagged low flexibility, dig into what specifically would need to change for them to attend, and whether there's a fallback slot they haven't mentioned. If they marked everything as working perfectly, sanity-check by asking about recurring commitments they might have overlooked.
Q11
選択式
Which team or department are you scheduling on behalf of? (Template note: replace with your actual team list.)
- (Replace with Team/Department A)
- (Replace with Team/Department B)
- (Replace with Team/Department C)
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
Thanks for sharing your availability! We'll use everyone's responses to lock in the final date and send a calendar invite shortly.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasons behind low-availability ratings and uncovers recurring scheduling conflicts a static poll would miss
- Combines a matrix rating of each proposed date/time with a ranked preference question, so organizers get both granularity and a clear tiebreaker
- Captures time zone, meeting format, and general day-of-week preferences alongside the specific date options, reducing the risk of picking a slot that quietly excludes key people
- Uses opening and closing chat messages plus opinion-scale questions on flexibility and meeting importance to add context AI templates can't gather
Jotform
Scheduling Poll Form TemplateA ready-to-field static form for collecting availability from a group, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers the basics of gathering date/time preferences but doesn't probe deeper into why a respondent marked a slot as unavailable. Good for simple polls, less suited to uncovering hidden scheduling conflicts.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready template within a widely used form builder
- Likely supports easy customization of date/time fields and branding
- Part of a broad template library with integrations (payments, notifications, etc.)
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore conflicts behind low-availability answers
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent, published methodology for how the form logic was designed
SurveyMonkey
Online Scheduling Poll TemplateA standard survey template for polling group availability, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and reporting. It's a fielding-ready poll but relies on fixed multiple-choice/matrix-style questions rather than any conversational probing. Reporting is likely solid for aggregate results but not tailored to individual respondent nuance.
優れている点
- Established survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
- Likely offers clean aggregate visualizations of availability across respondents
- Simple, familiar poll format for quick group scheduling
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into recurring constraints or conflicts
- No voice interview or guided task option for richer context
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Scheduling Poll Form TemplateA conversational-style, fielding-ready form for collecting meeting availability, leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX. It's more engaging to fill out than a plain grid but the question flow is still fixed rather than adaptive to individual answers. Useful for simple scheduling polls without deeper conflict discovery.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational UI that likely improves completion rates
- Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup
- Supports logic jumps for basic branching between questions
物足りない点
- No true adaptive AI interviewing that follows up based on specific availability answers
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency
よくあるご質問
「Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We're trying to lock in a time that works for everyone. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. P…」・「How well does each proposed date and time work for you? (Template note: replace these rows with your actual candidate da…」・「Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。