Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートOperations & Data
Meeting Availability & Scheduling Preferences Survey
Maps when employees are genuinely available and willing to meet, how their meeting time actually breaks down, and where scheduling friction eats into focus work. An AI follow-up interview digs into one specific recent meeting that went wrong and what would have fixed it. Built for ops, IT, and people teams auditing meeting culture.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
In a typical work week, how many meetings do you attend?
- Fewer than 5
- 5-10
- 11-20
- More than 20
Q03
マトリクス必須
For each time block below, how available are you for meetings on a typical workday?
6行 × 4列
- Early morning (7-9am)
- Mid-morning (9-11am)
- Midday (11am-1pm)
- Early afternoon (1-3pm)
- Late afternoon (3-5pm)
- ほか1件
列: Best time for me · Workable · Avoid if possible · Rarely/never available
Q04
ランク付け
Rank the days of the work week from most to least preferred for scheduling meetings.
- Monday
- Tuesday
- Wednesday
- Thursday
- Friday
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須
Thinking about the last 30 days, how often could a meeting you attended have been replaced by an email or async message instead?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Almost always
Q06
選択式
What's your preferred default length for a typical meeting?
- 15 minutes
- 30 minutes
- 45 minutes
- 60 minutes
- No strong preference
Q07
スライダーマトリクス必須
How important is each of the following when a meeting gets put on your calendar?
5行（各行にスライダー1つ）
- At least 24 hours of advance notice
- A clear agenda shared beforehand
- Buffer time between back-to-back meetings
- Ability to decline without pushback
- Meeting starts and ends on time
スライダー 0〜10最小:Not important at all最大:Extremely important
Q08
ポイント配分必須
Thinking of a typical 40-hour work week, allocate 100 points across how your meeting time actually breaks down.
- One-on-ones
- Team standups/status meetings
- Cross-team collaboration meetings
- External or client meetings
- Focus/deep work protected from meetings
100ポイントを配分
Q09
AIインタビュー
Ask the respondent to walk you through one specific meeting from the last couple of weeks that was scheduled at a bad time or felt like a poor use of their time. Get concrete: what was the meeting, why did the timing or format not work, and what would have made it better (different time, shorter length, async instead, more notice)? If they said meetings are rarely replaceable by email, probe what makes those meetings genuinely need live discussion instead.
Q10
評価スケール必須
Overall, how satisfied are you with how meetings are scheduled at your organization today?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q11
選択式
Which best describes your role level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Senior manager or director
- Executive/VP and above
- Prefer not to say
Q12
プルダウン
Which department are you in? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your answers will help shape better defaults for when and how meetings get scheduled here.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond a static availability grid: a matrix captures availability by time block, a ranking question surfaces day-of-week preferences, and a constant-sum question forces respondents to allocate their actual 40-hour week across meeting types.
- An AI follow-up interview asks each respondent to walk through one specific recent meeting that went wrong and what would have fixed it, producing qualitative detail that fixed-choice questions can't reach.
- An opinion scale on how often a recent meeting could have been an email, plus a slider matrix on what makes a meeting worth booking, quantify scheduling friction rather than just recording stated availability.
- Role-level and department breakdowns, a rating of overall scheduling satisfaction, and automated per-response quality scoring make the results easier for ops/IT/people teams to segment and trust straight into a report.
Jotform
Meeting Availability Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-field static form template for collecting employee meeting availability, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder with broad integration options. It's oriented toward simple scheduling logistics rather than diagnosing meeting culture or friction. No mention of adaptive questioning or qualitative depth beyond fixed fields.
優れている点
- Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's widely-used form builder
- Likely integrates with calendars/apps and other Jotform workflow tools
- Fast to deploy for basic availability collection
物足りない点
- Static field-based form with no adaptive follow-up questioning
- No mechanism to probe a specific meeting failure in the respondent's own words
- No automated quality scoring or generated analysis report
SurveySparrow
Meeting Availability Survey Template | Know Employee Availability for MeetingsA conversational-style survey template for gathering employee meeting availability, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make static questions feel more engaging. It focuses on scheduling logistics and preferences, not on measuring where meeting time is wasted or why specific meetings fail. Question flow is templated rather than adaptive.
優れている点
- Conversational chat-style interface improves respondent completion experience
- Pre-built template speeds up deployment for basic availability questions
- Part of a broader survey platform with reporting/dashboard features
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into a specific problematic meeting
- No voice AI interview option
- No transparent, publishable prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Meeting Availability & Scheduling Preferences Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this! We're trying to understand when meetings actually work for people and where sch…」・「In a typical work week, how many meetings do you attend?」・「For each time block below, how available are you for meetings on a typical workday?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。