QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

University Student Satisfaction & Experience Survey

Tracks how satisfied students are with teaching, advising, facilities, and campus life, and pinpoints which improvements matter most using a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or experience behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing detail closed questions miss.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全15問・約8分
Q01
メッセージ

Hi! We'd love to hear how your experience at the university is going so far. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 5-6 minutes, and your honest feedback (positive or critical) directly shapes what we improve.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with your experience at this university so far?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q03
マトリクス必須

How would you rate each of the following aspects of university life?

6行 × 5列
  • Quality of teaching and instruction
  • Academic advising and guidance
  • Campus facilities (libraries, labs, study spaces)
  • Career services and job placement support
  • Mental health and wellness services
  • ほか1件
列: Very poor · Poor · Fair · Good · Excellent
Q04
選択式必須

In the past semester, how often did you use academic support services (tutoring, writing center, advising drop-ins, etc.)?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • About monthly
  • Weekly or more
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the course registration and scheduling process this past term?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of the following improvements would matter most to your experience? Pick the most and least important each round.

  • More academic advising availability
  • Better campus WiFi and technology
  • Expanded mental health services
  • More affordable dining options
  • Improved career services and job placement support
  • More study and social spaces on campus
  • Better public transportation to campus
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most important to improve最も悪い:Least important to improve
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this university to a friend or prospective student?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall satisfaction and recommendation scores. Ask them to walk through one specific recent experience (a class, an advising visit, a service interaction) that best explains their rating, and anchor on whichever aspect they rated lowest in the earlier ratings to understand what specifically went wrong or what would need to change. If they rated everything highly, ask what would make an already-good experience great.

Q09
選択式必須

How likely are you to continue enrollment at this university next year?

  • Definitely will continue
  • Probably will continue
  • Not sure yet
  • Probably will transfer or leave
  • Definitely will transfer or leave
Q10
メッセージ

Almost done — just a few quick background questions to help us understand patterns across different student groups.

Q11
選択式

What year are you currently in?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year or beyond
  • Graduate student
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which area best describes your field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Business
  • Engineering & Technology
  • Health Sciences
  • Natural Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

What is your enrollment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
選択式

What is your age range?

  • 18-20
  • 21-23
  • 24-26
  • 27 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be combined with feedback from other students to identify what's working well and prioritize improvements for the coming year.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond satisfaction scores with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific moment or experience behind each student's rating, surfacing detail closed questions miss
  • Uses a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off exercise to identify which improvements actually matter most, rather than just asking respondents to rate everything highly
  • Combines a satisfaction matrix, registration/scheduling rating, recommendation likelihood, and re-enrollment intent with academic and demographic segmentation for a full picture in one flow
  • Every AI-driven question includes a transparent, viewable prompt, and results are compiled into an auto-generated report — no manual tallying required

SurveyMonkey

Student Satisfaction Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready template covering common satisfaction topics like teaching, facilities, and services. Built on a long-established survey platform with strong analytics and distribution tools, but the question set is fixed and closed-ended. Good for benchmarking against norms, less suited to uncovering the 'why' behind scores.

優れている点

  • Established, widely-used survey platform with mature distribution and panel options
  • Ready-to-field template requiring no custom build
  • Likely includes standard analytics/reporting dashboards

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents can't be probed further on individual answers
  • No trade-off/prioritization exercise to rank which improvements matter most
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency since it's a static form

SurveySparrow

University Student Satisfaction Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template aimed at the same student satisfaction use case, positioned around 'insightful data' collection. It likely offers a chat-like UI and branching logic, but branching is rule-based rather than AI-generated dialogue. No mention of voice interviews or automated scoring of open responses.

優れている点

  • Conversational/chat-style survey format that may feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Ready-to-use template for quick deployment
  • Likely supports basic skip logic for personalization

物足りない点

  • No true adaptive AI interview — follow-ups are pre-scripted rather than generated from the respondent's actual answer
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No transparent prompt library or automated per-response quality scoring

Jotform

Student Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A form-builder template focused on collecting structured feedback with Jotform's drag-and-drop customization. It's a static form well-suited for quick deployment and easy editing, but it doesn't attempt to explore the reasoning behind responses or weigh improvement priorities against each other.

優れている点

  • Highly customizable via drag-and-drop form builder
  • Ready-to-field template with common satisfaction question types
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payments, notifications, etc.)

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing — purely static question set
  • No best-worst/trade-off exercise to prioritize improvements
  • No automated quality scoring of responses or auto-generated insight reports

QuestionPro

University high school student survey questions + sample questionnaire template

This page reads more as a questionnaire guide/sample bank than a single ready-to-field template, offering a library of sample questions researchers can pick from. Useful as a reference for question wording across university and high school contexts, but it requires assembly rather than being deploy-ready out of the box.

優れている点

  • Broad library of sample questions spanning multiple student-related topics
  • Backed by a research-oriented platform with survey logic and analytics features
  • Flexible starting point for building a custom questionnaire

物足りない点

  • Presented as a question bank/guide rather than a single deploy-ready survey template
  • No adaptive AI or voice interview capability to dig into individual responses
  • No trade-off exercise or automated per-response quality scoring described

よくあるご質問

「University Student Satisfaction & Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が15問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We'd love to hear how your experience at the university is going so far. Your responses are completely confidential…」・「Overall, how satisfied are you with your experience at this university so far?」・「How would you rate each of the following aspects of university life?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、15問を約8分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Alumni Registration and Engagement Interest Survey

Collects updated contact and career details from graduates re-registering with your alumni network, along with their interest in mentoring, events, and giving. An AI follow-up interview digs into what would genuinely motivate them to reconnect, rather than just which boxes they check.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Satisfaction & Course Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with teaching quality, course content, workload, support services, and campus facilities, and pinpoints which areas most urgently need improvement — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific class or interaction behind their overall satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

University Faculty Satisfaction & Retention Survey

Measures how satisfied faculty are with compensation, workload, research support, governance, and career advancement, plus how many are seriously considering leaving. Built for provosts, deans, and faculty affairs offices; the AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind low scores or leaving intentions rather than just the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

University Exit Experience & Outcomes Survey

For students leaving a university — whether they graduated, withdrew, or transferred — this survey captures how they rate teaching, advising, support services, and overall value, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the real story behind their satisfaction score instead of settling for a flat rating.

テンプレートを見る