QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

University Faculty Satisfaction & Retention Survey

Measures how satisfied faculty are with compensation, workload, research support, governance, and career advancement, plus how many are seriously considering leaving. Built for provosts, deans, and faculty affairs offices; the AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind low scores or leaving intentions rather than just the numbers.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest experience as faculty here. This helps leadership understand what's working and what isn't. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It should take about 6-8 minutes, and your responses will be reviewed in aggregate.

Q02
マトリクス必須

How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your experience at this university?

8行 × 5列
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Teaching workload
  • Research funding and support
  • Voice in departmental or university governance
  • Work-life balance
  • ほか3件
列: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this university as a place to work to a colleague in your field?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q04
選択式必須

In the past 12 months, have you seriously considered leaving this university for another institution or a non-academic role?

  • No, haven't considered it
  • Yes, briefly considered it
  • Yes, actively looked at other opportunities
  • Yes, currently in the process of leaving
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the support you receive from your department chair or immediate supervisor?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of the following would most improve your satisfaction as faculty here, and which matters least right now?

  • Higher salary or better benefits
  • Reduced teaching load
  • More research funding and support
  • Greater voice in governance and decision-making
  • Better work-life balance
  • Clearer path to promotion or tenure
  • More administrative support
  • Stronger mentorship and professional development
  • Better facilities and resources
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most improves my satisfaction最も悪い:Matters least right now
Q07
ポイント配分必須

Thinking about a typical work week, how do you actually divide your time across these responsibilities? (Should add up to 100)

  • Teaching and course prep
  • Research and scholarship
  • Service and committee work
  • Administrative tasks
  • Student mentoring and advising
100ポイントを配分
Q08
AIインタビュー

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their answer about considering leaving. If they scored low or indicated they're actively looking or leaving, probe the specific triggering incident or ongoing frustration (workload, compensation, governance, lack of support) and what would realistically need to change to keep them. If they scored high and aren't considering leaving, probe what specifically keeps them engaged so it can be reinforced or replicated elsewhere.

Q09
選択式

What is your current academic rank or title?

  • Adjunct or part-time instructor
  • Lecturer/Instructor (full-time, non-tenure-track)
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Full Professor
  • Other academic staff
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
選択式

What is your tenure status?

  • Tenured
  • Tenure-track, not yet tenured
  • Non-tenure-track or contract
  • Not applicable at my institution
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How long have you been on faculty at this university?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
自由回答（短文）

What department, school, or discipline are you primarily affiliated with? (Optional)

Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for your candor. Your responses will be combined with other faculty feedback into a report for university leadership to inform decisions on workload, support, and retention.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that digs into the reasoning behind low likelihood-to-recommend scores and leaving intentions, not just the numeric ratings
  • Combines quantitative measures (matrix satisfaction ratings, opinion scale, rating, max-diff, constant-sum time allocation) with qualitative depth in one instrument
  • Captures context variables (rank, tenure status, years of service, department) so provosts and deans can segment retention risk by faculty subgroup
  • Opens and closes with plain-language chat messages that set expectations and thank participants, supporting honest, higher-quality responses

QuestionPro

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey | Sample Survey, Examples, Questions & Questionnaires

This is a sample question library and example page rather than an interactive fielding instrument with built-in follow-up logic. It's useful as a starting reference for question wording on faculty satisfaction topics, but the depth of insight depends entirely on the static questions asked. No indication of adaptive probing into why faculty gave a particular score.

優れている点

  • Broad library of sample faculty satisfaction questions and question types
  • Backed by an established, general-purpose survey platform with wide distribution options

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore the reasons behind low scores or leaving intentions
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey Questions

A static faculty satisfaction template built on SurveyMonkey's standard survey engine, aimed at quick deployment with familiar question types. It's a fielding-ready template, but it captures the 'what' of satisfaction scores rather than the 'why,' since there's no mechanism to probe individual responses further.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready template on a widely used, easy-to-deploy survey platform
  • Likely includes standard analytics dashboards and benchmarking common to SurveyMonkey

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to follow up on low satisfaction or retention-risk responses
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task capability
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

Jotform

Faculty Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A drag-and-drop form template on Jotform's form-builder platform, better suited to simple data collection than deep exploratory research. It's ready to field quickly and customize visually, but it functions as a static form rather than an interview, so nuance behind faculty responses isn't captured.

優れている点

  • Easy-to-customize, fielding-ready form builder interface
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form and workflow ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No auto-generated analytical report synthesizing qualitative reasoning behind scores

よくあるご質問

「University Faculty Satisfaction & Retention Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest experience as faculty here. This helps leadership understand what's…」・「How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your experience at this university?」・「How likely are you to recommend this university as a place to work to a colleague in your field?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Team Building Activity Impact & Culture Survey

Measures whether your team-building activities actually strengthen trust, communication, and belonging — and which formats are worth repeating versus retiring. Includes prioritization and budget-allocation exercises for planning future events, plus an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment that most changed how someone works with their teammates.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

University Student Satisfaction & Experience Survey

Tracks how satisfied students are with teaching, advising, facilities, and campus life, and pinpoints which improvements matter most using a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or experience behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing detail closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

University Exit Survey for Graduating & Departing Students

Captures why students are leaving — graduating, withdrawing, or transferring — and how satisfied they were with academics, advising, and support services. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision behind their recommendation score, giving administrators concrete, story-level detail instead of just a satisfaction number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

University Exit Experience & Outcomes Survey

For students leaving a university — whether they graduated, withdrew, or transferred — this survey captures how they rate teaching, advising, support services, and overall value, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the real story behind their satisfaction score instead of settling for a flat rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る