QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Hi! We're gathering feedback to improve the undergraduate experience on campus. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6-8 minutes, and your honest answers — good or bad — genuinely shape what changes next year.

Q02
選択式必須

What is your current class standing?

  • Freshman / first-year
  • Sophomore
  • Junior
  • Senior
  • Fifth-year or beyond
  • Other
Q03
マトリクス必須

How satisfied are you with each part of your undergraduate experience?

7行 × 5列
  • Academic advising
  • Course quality and rigor
  • Campus facilities and resources
  • Mental health and wellness services
  • Career services and internship support
  • ほか2件
列: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with your undergraduate experience so far?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q05
選択式

In the past academic term, how often did you use academic support resources such as tutoring, office hours, or a writing/study center?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • A few times a month
  • Weekly or more
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these, if improved, would make the biggest difference to your undergraduate experience?

  • More available academic advising appointments
  • Expanded mental health and counseling services
  • More career services and internship support
  • Increased financial aid or affordability support
  • Better campus housing options
  • More diverse clubs and extracurricular activities
  • Improved classroom technology and facilities
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would improve my experience most最も悪い:Would improve my experience least
Q07
オピニオンスケール

How strongly do you feel a sense of belonging to your campus community?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all最大:Extremely strongly
Q08
評価スケール

How would you rate the overall value of your undergraduate education relative to its cost?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor value最大:Excellent value
Q09
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to explain the reasoning behind their overall satisfaction score, anchoring on a specific recent experience (a class, an advising interaction, a campus event) that shaped that number. If their belonging score was low, probe what makes them feel disconnected and from whom (peers, faculty, or the institution). If they picked a top improvement priority in the trade-off question, ask what a better version of that resource would look like in practice. For very high or very low overall satisfaction, dig into whether that view is recent or has been consistent since they arrived.

Q10
選択式

Which of the following have you personally experienced this academic year? (Select all that apply)

  • Financial stress or affordability concerns
  • Heavy academic workload or time management struggles
  • Mental health or wellness challenges
  • Feeling disconnected from peers or campus community
  • Balancing work or family obligations with school
  • Uncertainty about career path or major
  • None of these
Q11
選択式

What is your age range? (Optional)

  • 18 or younger
  • 19-20
  • 21-22
  • 23-25
  • 26 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How do you describe your gender? (Optional)

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Are you the first in your immediate family to attend a four-year college or university? (Optional)

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses, along with everyone else's, go directly into a report the university uses to prioritize improvements to advising, wellness support, and campus life.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to explain the reasoning behind their rating, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs ratings alone miss
  • Covers the full institutional research picture in one flow: advising, coursework, facilities, wellness, and belonging via a satisfaction matrix, plus a dedicated belonging scale and a max-diff to prioritize what to improve
  • Includes demographic and equity-relevant context (first-generation status, age range, gender, class standing) so provosts and deans can segment results without a separate survey
  • Every response is automatically quality-scored and rolled into an auto-generated report, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked and why

QuestionPro

Undergraduate experience survey questions + sample questionnaire template

This is a genuine undergraduate experience template with a sample question set covering academics, facilities, and satisfaction, aimed at the same institutional research audience. It reads as a static questionnaire rather than an interactive interview experience, and the page functions partly as a guide with sample questions alongside the template itself. No mention of AI-driven follow-up or per-response scoring.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the undergraduate experience use case with sample questions tailored to that population
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution support
  • Provides example questionnaire language that researchers can adapt quickly

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — cannot probe why a student gave a particular satisfaction score
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports described on the page
  • No transparent, published interview prompts — respondents get fixed questions only

よくあるご質問

「Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We're gathering feedback to improve the undergraduate experience on campus. Your responses are completely confidenti…」・「What is your current class standing?」・「How satisfied are you with each part of your undergraduate experience?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Movie Rental Experience & Pricing Survey

Explores how people choose, pay for, and feel about movie rentals — from kiosks to on-demand streaming rentals — covering catalog satisfaction, pricing thresholds, and feature priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision behind a respondent's most recent rental to surface real friction, not just stated preferences. Built for streaming platforms, kiosk operators, and video-on-demand teams.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

University Student Satisfaction & Experience Survey

Tracks how satisfied students are with teaching, advising, facilities, and campus life, and pinpoints which improvements matter most using a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or experience behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing detail closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Student Satisfaction & Course Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with teaching quality, course content, workload, support services, and campus facilities, and pinpoints which areas most urgently need improvement — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific class or interaction behind their overall satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

University Faculty Satisfaction & Retention Survey

Measures how satisfied faculty are with compensation, workload, research support, governance, and career advancement, plus how many are seriously considering leaving. Built for provosts, deans, and faculty affairs offices; the AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind low scores or leaving intentions rather than just the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Student Program Recommendation & Advocacy Survey

Measures how likely students are to recommend a course, program, or instructor to a peer, what drives that willingness, and where the experience falls short. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind each student's score, surfacing concrete moments and details that a rating alone can't capture. Built for academic departments, bootcamps, and course teams tracking word-of-mouth and retention risk.

テンプレートを見る