すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Veterinarian Office Staff Experience Evaluation

Measures how pet owners experience the front desk, technicians, and veterinarians during a visit — friendliness, communication, competence, and wait times — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific interaction behind a client's rating. Built for veterinary practice managers who want actionable staff feedback, not just star ratings.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to tell us about your recent visit! We want to know how our team took care of you and your pet. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

What was the main reason for your most recent visit?

  • Routine checkup or vaccination
  • Sick or injured pet
  • Emergency visit
  • Surgery or procedure
  • Grooming or boarding drop-off/pick-up
  • Follow-up visit
  • Other
Q03
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the front desk/reception staff during your visit?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q04
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the veterinary technician or nurse who assisted with your pet?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the veterinarian who examined or treated your pet?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q06
マトリクス必須

Thinking about the staff you interacted with, how much do you agree with each statement?

5行 × 5列
  • Staff greeted me and my pet warmly
  • Staff explained the diagnosis or treatment clearly
  • Staff listened to my concerns and questions
  • Staff handled my pet gently and calmly
  • Staff followed up appropriately after the visit
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this veterinary office to another pet owner, based on the staff who cared for you?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific interaction that most shaped the respondent's recommendation score: which staff member (front desk, tech, or vet) was involved, what happened step by step, and what specifically stood out as great or frustrating. If the score was 6 or below, dig into what the staff could have done differently in that exact moment; if 9 or 10, identify the precise behavior worth reinforcing across the team.

Q09
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)

When you think about a great visit, which of these staff qualities matter most to you, and which matter least?

  • Friendliness and warmth toward you and your pet
  • Clear communication about diagnosis or treatment
  • Short wait times
  • Technical and medical competence
  • Cleanliness and organization of the facility
  • Empathy and patience with a nervous pet
  • Helpful follow-up after the visit
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q10
自由回答(長文)

Is there anything a specific staff member did — good or bad — that you'd want the office manager to know about?

Q11
選択式

How long have you been bringing your pet(s) to this practice?

  • This was my first visit
  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly to our practice manager to help recognize great staff moments and coach where it's needed.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that reconstructs the exact interaction (front desk, tech, or vet) driving a client's recommendation score, not just a numeric rating
  • Separates ratings for front desk staff, veterinary technicians, and veterinarians so practice managers can pinpoint which role needs coaching
  • Uses a max-diff question to rank which staff qualities (e.g., communication, competence, friendliness) matter most to clients, plus an open-ended prompt for specific praise or complaints about named staff behavior
  • Pairs a matrix of agreement statements and an open-text follow-up with automated report generation, turning free-text feedback into actionable, staff-specific insight rather than raw star ratings

SurveyMonkey

Veterinarian Employee Evaluation Survey Template

This is a static, fielding-ready template focused on evaluating veterinary employees, built on SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure. It appears oriented toward internal/managerial staff evaluation rather than capturing the pet owner's first-hand experience narrative. Good for quick deployment and broad distribution, but lacks depth on reconstructing specific client interactions.

優れている点

  • Backed by a well-known, widely trusted survey platform with broad distribution options
  • Ready-to-use template requiring no build time
  • Likely easy to customize question wording and branding within SurveyMonkey's editor

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a client rated staff a certain way
  • Static question set with no ability to reconstruct the specific interaction behind a rating
  • No published methodology on how responses are scored or weighted

SurveySparrow

Veterinarian Employee Evaluation Template

SurveySparrow offers this as a fielding-ready, conversational-style template, leveraging the platform's known chat-like UI for higher completion rates. Like SurveyMonkey's version, it reads as a staff evaluation form rather than a purpose-built client-experience survey with interaction-level detail. It's a solid quick-start option but stays at the level of standard rating questions.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style question flow that can improve completion rates on mobile
  • Ready-to-use template needing minimal setup
  • Clean, modern respondent-facing design typical of SurveySparrow forms

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into the specific moment that drove a client's score
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No transparent, published prompt logic for how any follow-up questions are generated

よくあるご質問

「Veterinarian Office Staff Experience Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to tell us about your recent visit! We want to know how our team took care of you and yo…」・「What was the main reason for your most recent visit?」・「How would you rate the front desk/reception staff during your visit?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る